Juridical Review of Perpetrators Who Use Artist Photos for Online Gambling Promotion Without Permission if They are Associated with Human Rights in Indonesia

Authors

  • Renaldy Youbella Suryawinata Faculty of Law Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia
  • Angelica Christyanto Soegiarto Faculty of Law Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia
  • Josephine Lee Faculty of Law Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19166/lp.v2i2.9034

Keywords:

Technology, Cyber Crime, Law Enforcement

Abstract

Technological developments have a significant impact on social life, creating new opportunities and challenges. One of the negative impacts is cybercrime which increases risks and vulnerabilities. Effective law enforcement is necessary to protect individual rights and ensure digital security. The research method used in this study involves a juridical-normative approach to analyze the implementation of laws related to the use of artist photos for the promotion of unlicensed online gambling in Indonesia. Implementation of the ITE Law and PDP Law is important in dealing with cybercrime. Law enforcement through the ITE Law and the PDP Law is a crucial instrument in tackling this kind of cybercrime, but there are still challenges in the effectiveness and relevance of the two laws. Continuous efforts are needed to strengthen law enforcement, increase public awareness, and pay greater attention to victim recovery as part of Indonesia's commitment to ensuring the protection of human rights in the digital era. Synergy between law enforcement officials, the private sector and the community is needed for prevention, law enforcement and recovery of victims. Protection of individual rights, including artists who are victims of photo misuse, must be a priority with a holistic and collaborative approach. Indonesia can maintain and strengthen human rights principles in the digital era, while ensuring that perpetrators of cybercrimes that violate the law can be dealt with firmly and fairly.

References

Laws and Regulations:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Indonesian Criminal Code.

Law Number 19 of 2016 on Amendment of Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transaction. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 Number 251, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5952.

Law Number 27 of 2022 on Protection of Personal Data. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2022 Number 196, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6820.

Books:

Kamus Pusat Bahasa. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa, 2008.

Sugiarto, Umar Said. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Journal Articles:

Ahmad, Sufmi Dasco. “Cybercrime In The Context Of Criminal Defamation In Indonesia.” Webology 19, no. 2 (2022): 803–813. https://www.webology.org/abstract.php?id=1238.

Angkasa, Rili Windiasih, and Ogiandhafiz Juanda. “Efektivitas Rancangan Undang-Undang Penghapusan Kekerasan Seksual Sebagai Hukum Positif Dalam Perspektif Viktimologi.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 4, no. 1 (June 2021): 117–145. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i1.2696.

Aziz, Norjihan Ab, Nurah Sabahiah Mohamed, Nasimah Hussin, and Najaa Syahirah Samsudin. “Restorative Justice in the Child Justice System: Implementation in Other Jurisdictions.” Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) 7, no. 6 (January 2022): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i6.1561.

Benuf, Kornelius, Siti Mahmudah, and Ery Agus Priyono. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Keamanan Data Konsumen Financial Technology di Indonesia”. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (August 2019): 145–60. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v3.i2.p145-160.

Brownsword, Roger, and Han Somsen. “Law, Innovation and Technology: Fast Forward to 2021”. Law, Innovation and Technology 13, no. 1 (March 2021): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1898298.

Darlington, Mutanda, and Cheryl Hendricks. “Restorative Justice in Zimbabwe’s Reconciliation Process: Some Considerations.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 28, no. 4 (2022): 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000599.

Fery, Muhammad Solikhin. “Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Siber di Polda Jatim.” Kawruh Abiyasa 2, no. 2 (2022): 165–176. https://jurnalkawruh.id/index.php/kwa/article/view/48.

Ginting, Okta Lestari Br., Abdul Razak Nasution, and Saiful Azmi Hasibuan “Juridical Review of Social Media Defamation.” International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences 3, no. 1 (May 2022): 190–94. https://doi.org/10.53695/injects.v3i1.753.

Gul, Rehna, and Abdallah Mohamed Othman El Nofely. “The Future of Law from the Jurisprudence Perspective for Example: The Influence of Science & Technology to Law, AI Law.” Equity of Law and Government 1, no. 1 (September 2021): 99-104. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.4.2.2021.99-104.

Harding, Andrew. “Theories of Law and Development.” Asian Journal of Social Science 46, no. 4–5 (September 2018): 421–44. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-04604003.

Harnowo, Tri. “Law as Technological Control of the Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Digital Era.” Corporate and Trade Law Review (CTLR) 2, no. 1 (July 2022): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.21632/ctlr.2.1.65-79.

Indrianingsih, Laily, and Budiarsih. “Analisis Hukum Konten Negatif di Platform Youtube di Indonesia.” Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 2, no. 3 (December 2022): 892–916. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.71.

Jahar, Asep Saepudin, Raju Moh Hazmi, and Nurul Adhha. “Construction of Legal Justice, Certainty, and Benefits in the Supreme Court Decision Number 46P/HUM/2018.” Cita Hukum 9, no. 1 (2021): 159–178. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i1.11583.

Johnstone, Gerry. “Restorative Justice and the Culture of Control.” The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 61, no. 1 (2022): 23–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12461.

Ju, Ade Borami, and Eko Nurisman. “Cyberbullying: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Atas Hilangnya Nyawa Seseorang Ditinjau Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.” Sasana 8, no. 1 (2022): 175–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v8i1.1262.

Kamran, Muhammad, and Maskun. “Penipuan Dalam Jual Beli Online: Perspektif Hukum Telematika.” Balobe Law Journal 1, no. 1 (April 2021): 41-56. https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v1i1.501.

Kryshtanovych, Myroslav, Roman Storozhev, Kostiantyn Malyshev, Anna Munko, and Olena Khokhba. “State Management of the Development of National Cybersecurity Systems.” International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 22, no. 5 (2022): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.22937/ijcsns.2022.22.5.3.

Meliala, Nefa Claudia. “Rechterlijk Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim): Suatu Upaya Menuju Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dengan Paradigma Keadilan Restoratif.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 8, no. 3 (2020): 551–568. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i3.820.

Muldani, Trisno. “Implikasi Awal Penerbitan SKB UU ITE Pasal 27 ayat (3).” MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 1, no. 2 (May 2022): 148–163. https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v1i2.857.

Muslih, Sodik, Mutiara Ramadhani, Diyah Ayu Riyanti, and Muhammad Marizal. “Implementasi Restorative Justice Pada Penyelesaian Kasus Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam UU ITE.” Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum 3, no. 2 (2021): 98–114. https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v3i2.443.

Ramadhani, Defi Sri Sunardi, Setiawan Noerdajasakti, and Faizin Sulistio. “Kedudukan Surat Keputusan Bersama Sebagai Pedoman Implementasi Pasal Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam UU ITE.” Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 2 (2022): 376–386. https://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk/article/view/27008.

Siahaan, Albert Lodewyk Sentosa. “Urgensi Perlindungan Data Pribadi Di Platform Marketplace Terhadap Kemajuan Teknologi.” Majalah Hukum Nasional 52, no. 2 (2022): 209–223. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v52i2.169.

Sukardi, and Hadi Rahmat Purnama. “Restorative Justice Principles in Law Enforcement and Democracy.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 1 (2022): 155–90. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.53057.

Triantono, and Muhammad Marizal. “Konsep Moderasi Pidana Mati RKUHP Dalam Perspektif HAM dan Kepentingan Negara.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 5, no. 1 (2022): 111–27. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v5i1.6399.

Widayanti, Putri Wahyu. “Tindak Pidana Pencurian Data Nasabah Dalam Bidang Perbankan Sebagai Cyber Crime.” Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan 2, no. 2 (2022): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2022.2.2.1-21.

Widiatno, Andi, and Ganiviantara Pratama. “Cyberporn Dalam Pasar Digital Non-Fungible Tokens: Prespektif Undang-Undang Informasi Transaksi Elektronik Dan Pornografi.” Journal Justiciabelen 2, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v2i2.2110.

Internet:

Firmansyah, M Julnis. “UU PDP Disahkan, Pemalsu Data Pribadi Diancam Denda Hingga Rp6 Miliar.” Tempo, October 19, 2022. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/uu-pdp-disahkan-pemalsu-data-pribadi-diancam-denda-hingga-rp6-miliar-271543.

Suhartanto, Crysania. “Promosi Judi Online Disebut Makin Nekat, Pakai Deepfake Raffi Ahmad.” Bisnis.com, January 18, 2024. https://teknologi.bisnis.com/read/20240118/84/1733364/promosi-judi-online-disebut-makin-nekat-pakai-deepfake-raffi-ahmad.

Wicaksono, Pebrianto Eko. “Raffi Ahmad Dijadikan Bahan Hoaks, dari Judi Online Sampai Bagikan Hadiah.” Liputan6.com, September 30, 2024. https://www.liputan6.com/cek-fakta/read/5491326/raffi-ahmad-dijadikan-bahan-hoaks-dari-judi-online-sampai-bagikan-hadiah.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-04

Issue

Section

Articles