Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of a Shortened Rifapentine-Moxifloxacin Regimen in Treating Drug-Sensitive Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Luthfia Ayu Wicaksana General practitioner, RS Asysyifaa, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Endy Amos Todo Hasudungan Sirait Department of Pulmonology & Respiratory Medicine, Hasanuddin Damrah Manna Regional General Hospital (RSUD Hasanuddin Damrah Manna), South Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19166/med.v15i2.10976

Keywords:

Safety, efficacy, rifapentine, moxifloxacin

Abstract

Background:

Prolonged treatment duration remains a key challenge in managing drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis (DS-TB), contributing to poor adherence and treatment failure. Recent evidence suggests that regimens incorporating rifapentine and moxifloxacin (RPT+MOX) may allow for effective 4-month treatment courses.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of shortened RPT+MOX regimens. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched up to May 2025. Eligible studies included randomized trials or observational cohorts comparing shortened RPT+MOX regimens with standard 6-month therapies in patients with DS-TB. Outcomes included culture conversion at 8 weeks, relapse or treatment failure, and serious adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.

Result:

Five studies (three RCTs, two observational) met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in risk for relapse or treatment failure (RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.37–1.67), culture conversion (RR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.80–1.69), or serious adverse events (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.65–1.29) between RPT+MOX and standard regimens. Risk of bias ranged from minimal to moderate. The GRADE assessment supported high certainty of evidence.

Conclusions:

Shortened RPT+MOX regimens demonstrate comparable effectiveness and safety to standard 6-month treatment for DS-TB, supporting their use in appropriate settings. Further studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes, real-world adherence, and feasibility across diverse populations.

References

1. Bloom BR, Atun R, Cohen T, Dye C, Fraser H, Gomez GB, et al. Tuberculosis. In: Holmes KK, Bertozzi S, Bloom BR, Jha P, editors. Major Infectious Diseases [Internet]. 3rd ed. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2017 [cited 2025 Jun 3]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK525174/

2. Santosa A, Juniarti N, Pahria T, Susanti RD. Integrating narrative and bibliometric approaches to examine factors and impacts of tuberculosis treatment non-compliance. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2025 Feb 28;20(1):1016.

3. Jiang W, Dong D, Febriani E, Adeyi O, Fuady A, Surendran S, et al. Policy gaps in addressing market failures and intervention misalignments in tuberculosis control: prospects for improvement in China, India, and Indonesia. The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific. 2024 May;46:101045.

4. Chakaya JM, Harries AD, Marks GB. Ending tuberculosis by 2030—Pipe dream or reality? International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020 Mar;92:S51–4.

5. Ahmad Z, Tyagi S, Minkowski A, Peloquin CA, Grosset JH, Nuermberger EL. Contribution of moxifloxacin or levofloxacin in second-line regimens with or without continuation of pyrazinamide in murine tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 1;188(1):97–102.

6. Dorman SE, Nahid P, Kurbatova EV, Phillips PPJ, Bryant K, Dooley KE, et al. Four-Month Rifapentine Regimens with or without Moxifloxacin for Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1705–18.

7. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;n71.

8. Jindani A, Harrison TS, Nunn AJ, Phillips PPJ, Churchyard GJ, Charalambous S, et al. High-dose rifapentine with moxifloxacin for pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1599–608.

9. Conde MB, Mello FCQ, Duarte RS, Cavalcante SC, Rolla V, Dalcolmo M, et al. A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of a Rifapentine plus Moxifloxacin-Based Regimen for Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154778.

10. Louie JK, Agraz-Lara R, Velásquez GE, Phillips A, Szumowski JD. Experience With Four-Month Rifapentine and Moxifloxacin-Based Tuberculosis Treatment in San Francisco. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Apr;11(4):ofae178.

11. Kurbatova EV, Whitworth WC, Peddareddy LP, Phillips PPJ, Scott NA, Bryant KE, et al. Efficacy and Safety of 4-Month Rifapentine-Based Tuberculosis Treatments in Persons with Diabetes. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025 Mar;31(3):467–76.

12. World Health Organization. WHO operational handbook on tuberculosis. Module 4: Treatment. Drug-susceptible tuberculosis treatment. In: 1st ed. World Health Organization; 2024.

13. Naidoo A, Naidoo K, McIlleron H, Essack S, Padayatchi N. A Review of Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;57(11):1369–86.

14. Johnson TM, Rivera CG, Lee G, Zeuli JD. Pharmacology of emerging drugs for the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases. 2024 Dec;37:100470.

15. Saktiawati AMI, Vasiliu A, Saluzzo F, Akkerman OW. Strategies to Enhance Diagnostic Capabilities for the New Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (DR-TB) Drugs. Pathogens. 2024 Nov 28;13(12):1045.

16. Karnan A, Jadhav U, Ghewade B, Ledwani A, Shivashankar P. A Comprehensive Review on Long vs. Short Regimens in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) Under Programmatic Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (PMDT). Cureus. 2024 Jan;16(1):e52706.

17. Mardhiyyah CA, Aprilio K, Sumarheni, Gnanasan S, Pitaloka DAE, Pradipta IS. Can we involve pharmacists as direct service providers for people with tuberculosis? A narrative review of current evidence. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy. 2025 Sep;19:100613.

18. Dartois VA, Rubin EJ. Anti-tuberculosis treatment strategies and drug development: challenges and priorities. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022 Nov;20(11):685–701.

19. An Y, Khun KE. Factors associated with incomplete tuberculosis preventive treatment: a retrospective analysis of six-years programmatic data in Cambodia. Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 9;14(1):18458.

20. Mancuso G, Midiri A, De Gaetano S, Ponzo E, Biondo C. Tackling Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: New Challenges from the Old Pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microorganisms. 2023 Sep 10;11(9):2277.

21. Holmes KK, Bertozzi S, Bloom BR, Jha P, editors. Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 6): Major Infectious Diseases [Internet]. The World Bank; 2017 [cited 2025 Jun 5]. Available from: http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/978-1-4648-0524-0

22. Marques L, Costa B, Pereira M, Silva A, Santos J, Saldanha L, et al. Advancing Precision Medicine: A Review of Innovative In Silico Approaches for Drug Development, Clinical Pharmacology and Personalized Healthcare. Pharmaceutics. 2024 Feb 27;16(3):332.

23. Reynolds J, Heysell SK. Understanding pharmacokinetics to improve tuberculosis treatment outcome. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2014 Jun;10(6):813–23.

24. Ventresca M, Schünemann HJ, Macbeth F, Clarke M, Thabane L, Griffiths G, et al. Obtaining and managing data sets for individual participant data meta-analysis: scoping review and practical guide. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Dec;20(1):113.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-10

How to Cite

Wicaksana, L. A., & Sirait, E. A. T. H. (2026). Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of a Shortened Rifapentine-Moxifloxacin Regimen in Treating Drug-Sensitive Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review. Medicinus, 15(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.19166/med.v15i2.10976

Issue

Section

Clinical Article