BENTUK KETERLIBATAN PEMEGANG SAHAM DALAM PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG DAPAT MEMPERLUAS PERTANGGUNGJAWABANNYA

Velliana Tanaya

Abstract


Limited Liability Company is the most popular form of business entity in Indonesia because law acknowledges the principle of limited liability of its shareholders, which gives advantages for entrepreneurs running a business. Article 3 Subsection 1 Law No. 40 Year 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company stated that company’s shareholders are not personally liable for agreements made on behalf of the Company and are not liable for the Company’s losses in excess of their prospective shareholding. However, in Article 3 Subsection 2 there are some waivers of the principle, one of the exceptions is if the relevant shareholders are involved in illegal actions committed by the Company. It is interesting because in fact, usually, shareholder do not get involved in company’s management. Through normative research with Statute and Conceptual Approach on Piercing the Corporate Veil, shareholders can be accountable for personal responsibility if shareholders in giving his/her voting rights in General Meeting of Shareholders neglect his/her duty of care, or if besides of being shareholders he/she also become Board of Directors and/or Board of Commissioners who runs the Company’s management, or if the shareholders give order or command to Board of Directors or Board of Commissioners or company’s employee to perform actions that causing the Company committed an unlawful act and harm others (tort). Personal liability can be requested if injured party filing a tort lawsuit and set the relevant shareholders as a defendant besides the Company.


Keywords


Shareholders, Tort, Piercing The Corporate Veil, Limitied Liability Company



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/lr.v17i3.834

Full Text:

PDF

References


BUKU

Agustina, Rosa. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jakarta : Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2003.

Badrulzaman , Miriam Darus, Hukum Perikatan dalam KUHPerdata Buku Ketiga: Yurisprudensi, Doktrin, Serta Penjelasan, Bandung: Penerbit Citra Aditya, 2015

Daliyo, J.B. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta : Prenhallindo, 2001.

Djojodirdjo, Moegni. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jakarta : Pradnya Paramita, 1979.

Fuady, Munir. Doktrin-Doktrin Modern dalam Corporate Law dan Eksistensinya dalam Hukum Indonesia. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

___________. Hukum Perusahaan dalam Paradigma Hukum Bisnis. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.

Gunawan Widjaja, Risiko Hukum sebagai Direksi, Komisaris, dan Pemilik PT. Jakarta : Forum Sahabat, 2008.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2013.

Harris, Freddy, Teddy Anggoro. Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Kewajiban Pemberitahuan oleh Direksi. Bogor : Ghalia Indonesia, 2013.

Iminiyati, Neni Sri. Hukum Bisnis : Telaah tentang Pelaku dan Kegiatan Ekonomi. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu, 2009.

Kansil, C.S.T., Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta : Balai Pustaka, 1986.

Khairandy, Ridwan. Perseroan Terbatas : Doktrin, Peraturan Perundang-undangan, dan Yurisprudensi. Yogyakarta : Kreasi Total Media, 2009.

Sidharta, B. Arief, Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Buku I. Bandung : Alumni, 2000.

Subekti, R, R. Tjitrosudibio , Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Cetakan 29. Jakarta : Pradnya Paramita, 1999.

Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta : Intermasa, 2003.

Wicaksono, Frans Satrio. Tanggung Jawab Pemegang Saham, Direksi, dan Komisaris Perseroan Terbatas (PT). Jakarta : Visimedia, 2009.

PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Perseroan Terbatas. UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1995, LN Nomor 13, TLN Nomor 3587.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Perseroan Terbatas. UU Nomor 40 Tahun 2007, LN Nomor 106, TLN Nomor 4756.

JURNAL

Ramsay, Ian M., David B. Noakes. “Piercing the Corporate Veil in Australia”. 19 Company and Securities Law Journal, 2001.

HASIL PENELITIAN

Carmelita, Melisa. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Doktrin Piercing the Corporate Veil dalam Prinsip Hukum Perusahaan di Indonesia (Studi kasus pada PT X)”. Skripsi, Jakarta : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, 2008.

Prayitno, Cuk. “Tinjauan Yuridis Kepemilikan Kekayaan Negara yang Dipisahkan dan Pertanggungjawaban Pengurus BUMN yang Berbentuk Persero”. Tesis, Jakarta : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2010.

KAMUS

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Edisi III. Jakarta : Balai Pustaka, 2001.

Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary 8th Edition. USA : West Group, 2004.

WEBSITE DAN LAIN-LAIN

Andyna Susiawati Achmad, “Keputusan RUPS Rugikan Perusahaan”, . 22 Februari 2018

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jombang Nomor 39/Pdt.G/2011/PN.JMB


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Law Review

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 
slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor