Studi Komparasi Hak Cipta Atas Proses Data Scrapping AI di Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika

Authors

  • Arnold Rezon Program Studi Magister Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya
  • Yehezkiel Montolalu Program Studi Magister Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya
  • Hendri Kenuwiarja Program Studi Magister Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya
  • Fajar Sugianto Program Studi Magister Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya

Keywords:

Copyright, Artificial Intelligence, Data Scrapping, Hak Cipta

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has encouraged the massive use of data scraping to collect algorithm training materials. However, this practice raises new legal issues related to copyright infringement, moral rights, and economic rights of creators. This study compares the legal approaches of the European Union, the United States, and Indonesia in regulating copyright issues in the context of data scraping for AI training. The results of the analysis show that the European Union, through the Artificial Intelligence Act and GDPR, emphasizes transparency, consent, and protection of the moral rights of creators as the main pillars. The United States relies on the principle of fair use with broad interpretation space, but faces litigation challenges and uncertainty of protection for creators. Indonesia, meanwhile, does not yet have specific regulations governing scraping in the context of AI, so that national creative works are vulnerable to exploitation without adequate protection. This study recommends that Indonesia immediately develop regulations that require transparency of datasets, attribution, and compensation for the use of works in AI training, in order to maintain a balance between technological innovation and protection of intellectual property rights.

Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Perkembangan teknologi Artificial Intelligence (AI) telah mendorong penggunaan data scraping secara masif untuk mengumpulkan materi pelatihan algoritma. Namun, praktik ini menimbulkan persoalan hukum baru terkait pelanggaran hak cipta, hak moral, dan hak ekonomi pencipta. Penelitian ini membandingkan pendekatan hukum Uni Eropa, Amerika Serikat, dan Indonesia dalam mengatur isu hak cipta dalam konteks data scraping untuk pelatihan AI. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Uni Eropa, melalui Artificial Intelligence Act dan GDPR, menekankan transparansi, persetujuan, dan perlindungan hak moral pencipta sebagai pilar utama. Amerika Serikat mengandalkan prinsip fair use dengan ruang interpretasi luas, namun menghadapi tantangan litigasi dan ketidakpastian perlindungan bagi kreator. Indonesia, sementara itu, belum memiliki regulasi khusus yang mengatur scraping dalam konteks AI, sehingga karya kreatif nasional rentan dieksploitasi tanpa perlindungan memadai. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan agar Indonesia segera mengembangkan regulasi yang mewajibkan transparansi dataset, atribusi, dan kompensasi penggunaan karya dalam pelatihan AI, demi menjaga keseimbangan antara inovasi teknologi dan perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual.

References

Bediona, Kornelis Antonius Ada, Randi Hilman Nurjaman, Muhamad Rafly Falah Herliansyah, and Dzulfikri Syarifuddin. “Jurnal Analisil Teori Perlindungan Hukum.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat 2, no. 1 (January 2024).

Blake Brittain. “Publisher Ziff Davis Sues OpenAI for Copyright Infringement.” Reuters, April 25, 2025.

Dwicahyo, Khirana, and Chanifah Indah Ratnasari. Perbandingan Metode Web Scraping Dalam Pengambilan Data: Kajian Literatur, n.d.

Fajar Sugianto, Felicia Christina Simeon, Dea Prasetyawati Wibowo. “IDEALISASI SIFAT ALTERNATIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MELALUI MEDIASI.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 3, no. 2 (2020): 253–265.

Hutson, J. “The Evolving Role of Copyright Law in the Age of AI-Generated Works.” Journal of Digital Technologies and Law 2, no. 4 (December 28, 2024): 886–914. https://www.lawjournal.digital/jour/article/view/486.

Mandeep Singh. “How Brands Are Using Ghibli-Inspired AI Art Trends for Viral Marketing.” Seo Discovery, April 8, 2025.

Mantegna, Micaela. “ARTificial: Why Copyright Is Not the Right Policy Tool to Deal with Generative AI.” The Yale Law Journal 133 (April 22, 2024).

OECD. Intellectual Property Issues in Artificial Intelligence Trained on Scraped Data. OECD Publishing. Paris: OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, 2025. Accessed May 9, 2025. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/intellectual-property-issues-in-artificial-intelligence-trained-on-scraped-data_d5241a23-en.html.

Office of the European Union L-, Publications, and Luxembourg Luxembourg. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 Laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence and Amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act)Text with EEA Relevance., n.d. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.

Oliver Bateman. “With ChatGPT’s Studio Ghibli Filter, Creativity Is Being Spirited Away.” Washington Post. Washington DC, April 2, 2025.

Philipus M. Hadjon. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Di Indonesia. Edisi khusus. Surabaya: Peradaban, 2007.

Priyankan Ghosh. “How AI-Generation and Commercialisation of Ghibli Images Erodes Artistic Integrity.” New Indian Express, April 17, 2025.

Rizquina, Apriza Zicka, and Chanifah Indah Ratnasari. “Implementasi Web Scraping Untuk Pengambilan Data Pada Website E-Commerce.” Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis 5, no. 4 (October 3, 2023): 377–383.

Rockwell Anyoha. “The History of Artificial Intelligence.” SITNBoston. Last modified August 28, 2017. Accessed December 4, 2024. https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/history-artificial-intelligence/.

Solove, Daniel J. THE GREAT SCRAPE: THE CLASH BETWEEN SCRAPING AND PRIVACY Woodrow Hartzog Forthcoming 113 CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW __ (2025), n.d.

Sugianto, Fajar. “Efisiensi Ekonomi Sebagai Remedy Hukum.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2014): 61–72.

Sugianto, Fajar; Indradewi A, Astrid; Valencia, Claresta Devina. “BETWEEN VALUATION AND MONETIZATION OF EFFICIENCY IN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW : IS IT POSSIBLE ?” Journal of International Trade, Logistics and Law 10, no. 1 (2024): 286–294.

Sugianto, Fajar, Astrid Athina Indradewi, and Yohanie Maretta. “Book Pirates and Copycats : Infringement That Speaks For Itself.” Anthology: Inside Intellectual Property Rights 2, no. 1 (2024): 259–269. https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/Anthology.

Sugianto, Fajar, Stevinell Mildova, and Felicia Christina Simeon. “Increasing Economic Performance Through the Rule of Law in Indonesia: Law and Economics Perspective.” Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 140, no. International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020) (2020): 92–99.

Sugianto, Fajar, and Tomy Saragih. “Intercalating Law As a Tool To Promote Economic Efficiency in Indonesia.” Arena Hukum 6, no. 2 (2013): 152–167.

Sugianto, Fajar, Ellora Sukardi, and Tomy Michael. “Comparison of Legal Consumer Protection Systems in E-Commerce Transactions To Support Digital Economic Growth in Indonesia.” Dalat University Journal of Science 12, no. 1 (2021): 39–51.

Tanujaya, Calista Putri. “Analisis Karya Ciptaan Artificial Intelligence Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta” 2 (April 1, 2024): 435–443.

United States Copyright Office. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence. https://www.copyright.gov, 2024. Accessed May 9, 2025. https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-1-Digital-Replicas-Report.pdf.

United States Copyright Office. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence. https://www.copyright.gov, 2025. Accessed May 9, 2025. https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Copyrightability-Report.pdf.

Wahyudi, Tri. “Studi Kasus Pengembangan Dan Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence (AI) Sebagai Penunjang Kegiatan Masyarakat Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal on Software Engineering (IJSE) 9, no. 1 (2023): 28–32. http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ijse28.

“Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Online).” Https://Kbbi.Web.Id/.

Undang Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Dalam Satu Naskah, 1945.

Undang Undang Hak Cipta No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. LNRI 266, Tahun 2014. TLNRI 5599, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-15

How to Cite

Rezon, A., Montolalu, Y., Kenuwiarja, H., & Sugianto, F. (2025). Studi Komparasi Hak Cipta Atas Proses Data Scrapping AI di Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika. Anthology: Inside Intellectual Property Rights, 3(1), 243–265. Retrieved from https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/Anthology/article/view/9815

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.