Apical Leakage of Bioceramic versus Epoxy Resin–Based Sealers in Single-Cone Obturation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/med.v15i3.11625Keywords:
Apical leakage, bioceramic sealer, epoxy resin sealer, single-cone obturationAbstract
Background:
Bioceramic sealers paired with the single-cone obturation technique represent an evolving clinical paradigm, yet no systematic review has exclusively evaluated their apical sealing performance against epoxy resin–based sealers within this specific technique. This study aimed to systematically compare the in vitro apical leakage of bioceramic versus epoxy resin–based sealers used with single-cone obturation in extracted human teeth.
Methods:
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted from inception to 1 April 2026, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Only English-language publications were included. In vitro and ex vivo studies comparing apical leakage between bioceramic and epoxy resin sealers with at least one single-cone obturation group were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIN tool. Standardized mean differences were pooled using a random-effects model for studies reporting comparable continuous leakage data.
Result:
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Five were rated as low risk of bias and three as medium risk. Meta-analysis of four studies with continuous leakage data (n = 77 per group) yielded a pooled SMD of −1.75 (95% CI: −3.92 to 0.42), favoring bioceramic sealers, though heterogeneity was considerable (I² = 88.1%). Narrative synthesis of the remaining four studies showed directionally consistent trends supporting bioceramic sealers across bacterial leakage and nanoleakage methodologies.
Conclusions:
Bioceramic sealers demonstrated a trend toward less apical leakage than epoxy resin–based sealers with single-cone obturation; however, evidence certainty remains low due to high heterogeneity and limited study numbers. Standardized multicenter in vitro studies and long-term clinical trials are warranted.
References
1. Gasner NS, Brizuela M. Endodontic Materials Used To Fill Root Canals. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 [cited 2026 Apr 8]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK587367/ PubMed PMID: 36508541.
2. Zhekov K, Stefanova V. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Root Canal Obturation with Hydraulic Condensation and Tricalcium Silicate Bioceramic Sealer: A 12-Month Observational Study on Periapical Healing. J Funct Biomater. 2025 Nov 5;16(11):412. doi:10.3390/jfb16110412 PubMed PMID: 41295067; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12653093.
3. Moghadam AA, Aminsobhani M, Afzali Z, Sarraf P. Physical properties comparison of four bioceramic vs. epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2026 Jan 7;26(1):364. doi:10.1186/s12903-025-07623-6 PubMed PMID: 41501783; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12930880.
4. Błaszczyk-Pośpiech A, Struzik N, Szymonowicz M, Sareło P, Wiśniewska-Wrona M, Wiśniewska K, et al. Endodontic Sealers and Innovations to Enhance Their Properties: A Current Review. Materials (Basel). 2025 Sep 11;18(18):4259. doi:10.3390/ma18184259 PubMed PMID: 41010104; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12471766.
5. Ivanova S, Tomova Z, Vlahova A, Stoeva IL, Vasileva E, Uzunova Y, et al. Contemporary Use of Polymers in Dentistry: A Narrative Review. Polymers. 2026 Jan 2;18(1):138. doi:10.3390/polym18010138
6. Sfeir G, Zogheib C, Patel S, Giraud T, Nagendrababu V, Bukiet F. Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Narrative Review and Clinical Perspectives. Materials (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;14(14):3965. doi:10.3390/ma14143965 PubMed PMID: 34300886; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8306764.
7. Lim M, Jung C, Shin DH, Cho YB, Song M. Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review. Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Aug;45(3):e35. doi:10.5395/rde.2020.45.e35 PubMed PMID: 32839716; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7431927.
8. Prasad Kumara PAAS, Cooper PR, Cathro P, Gould M, Dias G, Ratnayake J. Bioceramics in Endodontics: Limitations and Future Innovations—A Review. Dentistry Journal. 2025 Apr 1;13(4):157. doi:10.3390/dj13040157
9. Al-Askary RA, Al-Ashou WMO, Al-Jubori SH. In Vitro Apatite-Forming Ability of Different Root Canal Sealers (A Comparative Study). J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2025;15(2):173–83. doi:10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_12_25 PubMed PMID: 40433434; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12105809.
10. Zhang Q, Meng X, Zhan J, Huo L, Lei Y. Sealing ability of the single-cone obturation technique with bioceramic sealer iRoot SP in oval root canals: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):1364. doi:10.1186/s12903-025-06713-9 PubMed PMID: 40849477; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12374461.
11. Rekha R, Kavitha R, Venkitachalam R, Prabath SV, Deepthy S, Krishnan V. Comparison of the sealing ability of bioceramic sealer against epoxy resin based sealer: A systematic review & meta-analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023;13(1):28–35. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.10.006 PubMed PMID: 36345495; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9636474.
12. Dewi A, Soonthornpusit A, Jittarat W. Comparative Micro-CT Analysis of Bioceramic Sealer Activation Techniques in Distal Root Canals of Mandibular Molars. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2025 Aug 20;26(6):533–9. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3893
13. Elmsmari F, Elsayed Y, Aboubakr A, Kaafarani M, Nour O, Pawar AM. Clinical and radiographic success of single-cone bioceramic obturation versus traditional techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025;15(6):1422–32. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.08.031 PubMed PMID: 40948576; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12424407.
14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 PubMed PMID: 33782057; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8005924.
15. AlEraky DM, Rahoma AM, Abuohashish HM, AlQasser A, AlHamali A, AlHussain HM, et al. Assessment of Bacterial Sealing Ability of Two Different Bio-Ceramic Sealers in Single-Rooted Teeth Using Single Cone Obturation Technique: An In Vitro Study. Applied Sciences. 2023 Feb 24;13(5):2906. doi:10.3390/app13052906
16. Kaul S, Kumar A, Badiyani BK, Sukhtankar L, Madhumitha M, Kumar A. Comparison of Sealing Ability of Bioceramic Sealer, AH Plus, and GuttaFlow in Conservatively Prepared Curved Root Canals Obturated with Single-Cone Technique: An In vitro Study. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S857–60. doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_52_21
17. Medhat A, Ghoneim A, Nabil Roshdy N. The Effect of Final Irrigation Protocols on the Apical Sealing Ability of Epoxy Resin-based and Bioceramic-based Root Canal Sealers. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022 Dec 17;10(D):458–64. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2022.10864
18. Nimiya V, Chernad V, Thankachan RP, Samuel A, Ranjith K, David EC. In vitro study comparing sealing ability of resin-based and bioceramic sealers using single-cone obturation technique. Bioinformation. 2025;21(10):3436.
19. Sahib Mezaal Z, Abdulkareem S, G. Shareef L. In vitro apical microleakage evaluation for different endodontic sealers by spectrophotometric analysis: an observational study. F1000Res. 2022 Nov 28;11:1396. doi:10.12688/f1000research.127911.1
20. Somolová L, Morozova Y, Voborná I, Rosa M, Novotná B, Holík P, et al. Comparison of Apical Microleakage in Bioceramic and Resin-Based Endodontic Sealers with Conventional and Bioceramic Surface-Impregnated Gutta-Percha Points. Ceramics. 2025 May 26;8(2):65. doi:10.3390/ceramics8020065
21. Tour Savadkouhi S, Roghanizad N, Aghabeigi M, Sangchouli S, Khajavi F, Khalilak Z. Assessment the bacterial leakage of four endodontic root canal sealers using fresh human saliva, an ex vivo study. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2020 May 17;15(2):106–10. doi:10.22037/iej.v15i2.28089
22. Yanpiset K, Banomyong D, Chotvorrarak K, Srisatjaluk RL. Bacterial leakage and micro-computed tomography evaluation in round-shaped canals obturated with bioceramic cone and sealer using matched single cone technique. Restor Dent Endod. 2018;43(3):e30. doi:10.5395/rde.2018.43.e30
23. Camilleri J, Atmeh A, Li X, Meschi N. Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use. Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):710–77. doi:10.1111/iej.13709 PubMed PMID: 35167119; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9314068.
24. Hristov K, Bogovska-Gigova R. A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Void Formation in Apical Plugs Created with Calcium Silicate-Based Materials Using Various Application Techniques in 3D-Printed Simulated Immature Teeth. Dentistry Journal. 2025 Aug 25;13(9):385. doi:10.3390/dj13090385
25. Ashkar I, Sanz JL, Forner L, Melo M. Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Dentinal Tubule Penetration-A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 29;16(7):2734. doi:10.3390/ma16072734 PubMed PMID: 37049028; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10096084.
26. Almasri A, Abduljalil M, Aksoy U. Efficacy of Different Irrigation Activation Techniques on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of the Novel AH-Plus Bioceramic Sealer. Applied Sciences. 2024 Jan 14;14(2):701. doi:10.3390/app14020701
27. Verma A, Arora A, Taneja S. Comparative evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration and push-out bond strength of new injectable hydraulic calcium disilicate based root canal sealer: A single blinded in vitro study. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2024 Mar;14(2):143–51. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.01.009
28. Reynolds JZ, Augsburger RA, Svoboda KKH, Jalali P. Comparing dentinal tubule penetration of conventional and “HiFlow” bioceramic sealers with resin-based sealer: An in vitro study. Aust Endod J. 2020 Dec;46(3):387–93. doi:10.1111/aej.12425 PubMed PMID: 32741025.
29. Malik B, Chowdhary D, Taneja S. Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Tubule Penetration, Void Formation, and Push-Out Bond Strength of Premixed Injectable Bioceramic Sealers and AH Plus. Cureus. 2026 Feb;18(2):e102804. doi:10.7759/cureus.102804 PubMed PMID: 41788106; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12957894.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vikri Sandya Dhika, Veriantara Satya Dhika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
