VEGF as a Marker of Wound Healing: Better High or Better Low?

Authors

  • Kenny Wijaya Sutanto Biomedical Science Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Endang Sri Lestari Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Sigit Adi Prasetyo Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19166/med.v15i2.10978

Keywords:

VEGF, wound healing, angiogenesis, chronic wounds, biomarker

Abstract

Background:

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) is a key regulator of angiogenesis and tissue regeneration in wound healing. However, the prognostic significance of VEGF expression remains controversial, with both high and low levels variably associated with good or impaired wound healing. This review aimed to clarify the prognostic implications of VEGF expression in wound healing, focusing on whether high or low levels better pred ict favorable outcomes.

 

Methods:

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EBSCOHost, Embase, and Google Scholar using PRISMA guidelines. Studies involving VEGF measurements in human or animal models of acute and chronic wounds were included. VEGF levels were correlated with healing parameters such as angiogenesis, re-epithelialization, inflammation, and overall wound resolution. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

 

Result:

15 studies met inclusion criteria. High VEGF levels were oftenly associated with improved outcomes in early wound phases by enhancing angiogenesis. However, sustained high levels in chronic wounds often correlated with unresolved inflammation and fibrosis. In contrast, low VEGF expression indicates impaired angiogenesis.

 

Conclusions:

VEGF expression is related to the ongoing phase of wound healing. High levels are beneficial during the acute phase, but if sustained, it may exert negative effects. Clinical interpretation should consider wound type, timing, and VEGF source, rather than relying on absolute expression levels alone.

References

1. Pastar I. Biology and biomarkers for wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(3 Suppl):18S-28S.

2. Stacey MC. Biomarker directed chronic wound therapy – a new treatment paradigm. J Tissue Viability. 2020;29(2):71–5.

3. Pathak A. Role of angiogenesis and its biomarkers in development of targeted tumor therapies. Stem Cells Int. 2024;2024:9077926.

4. Demidova-Rice TN. Wound healing angiogenesis: innovations and challenges in acute and chronic wound healing. Adv Wound Care. 2012;1(3):99–111.

5. Elayat G. Angiogenesis in breast cancer: insights and innovations. Clin Exp Med. 2024;

6. Peluzzo AM. Challenging the paradigm: anti-inflammatory interleukins and angiogenesis. Cells. 2022;11(3):587.

7. Shaik F. Cytokine biomarkers in HIV‐associated Kaposi sarcoma. Cytokine. 2025;

8. Jiménez-López R. Cytokine profiles in diabetes without retinopathy. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(7):4512.

9. Chelmuș A. IL-6 trans-signalling in co-cultures. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(5):2247.

10. Cakmak HM. Dynamic serum biomarkers in infantile hemangioma. J Pediatr Surg. 2025;

11. Ma X. CPT1A/HIF-1α loop contributes to angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2025;

12. Lee YJ. VEGF modulation in diabetic foot ulcers. J Wound Care. 2023;

13. Singh S. VEGF dynamics in ischemic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2022;

14. Nakamura T. VEGF expression in pressure ulcers. J Dermatol Sci. 2021;

15. Ali A. VEGF and IL-6 interplay in chronic ulcers. Int J Inflamm Res. 2020;

16. Zhou K. Chronic and non-healing wounds: The story of vascular endothelial growth factor. Med Hypotheses. 2015;85(4):523–8.

17. Martínez-Cruz N. Angiogenic imbalance in venous ulcers. Vasc Med. 2018;

18. Tan M. Serum VEGF in trauma patients. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017;

19. Ligi D. Chronic venous disease–Part I: Inflammatory biomarkers in wound healing. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1862(10):1961–71.

20. Udupa EGP. Role of angiogenesis and angiogenic factors in acute and chronic wound healing. Plast Aesthet Res. 2015;2(5):243–9.

21. Mohan R. VEGF in post-surgical recovery. J Clin Invest. 2014;

22. Rossi A. Chronic wound biomarp kers in elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013;

23. Yussof SJM. Cellular events and biomarkers of wound healing. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012;45(2):220–8.

24. Mahmoud NN. Investigating inflammatory markers in wound healing. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2024;7(2):178–86.

25. Tan M. Protein biomarkers in venous leg ulcer fluid: a systematic review. Int Wound J. 2025;

26. Agyare C. Biomarkers of wound healing. IntechOpen. 2018;

Downloads

Published

2026-03-10

How to Cite

Sutanto, K. W., Lestari, E. S., & Prasetyo, S. A. (2026). VEGF as a Marker of Wound Healing: Better High or Better Low?. Medicinus, 15(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.19166/med.v15i2.10978

Issue

Section

Clinical Article