PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEBIJAKAN PRODUK KEMASAN POLOS PRODUK ROKOK AUSTRALIA DALAM WTO [Resolution of the Dispute over Australia's Rules and Policies for the Plain Packaging of Cigarette Products in the WTO]

Jantarda Mauli Hutagalung, Clara Ignatia Tobing

Abstract


Abstract

The sovereignty of a country to issue a policy or regulation in the field of international trade is limited by the enactment of the provisions in the World Trade Organization (WTO), especially for countries that have ratified the GATT / WTO. If a country issues rules and/or policy that conflict with WTO provisions, it will result in the country being sued by another country. As happened with the policy issued by Australia. Indonesia is suing Australia to the WTO for the rules and/or policies for the plain packaging of cigarette products (The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011) imposed by Australia. The policy is considered contrary to the provisions of the WTO, specifically the provisions of TRIPS (Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights). This research utilizes a normative juridical method by paying attention to legal materials such as legal principles, legal principles, international conventions, and legislation relating to the problem of The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act. From the results of the study can be seen WTO considerations in this case. In addition, there are also advantages and disadvantages of the implementation of The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act in the future.

Keywords: WTO/GATT, The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, International Economic Law

 

Abstrak

Kedaulatan suatu negara untuk mengeluarkan suatu kebijakan atau peraturan dalam bidang perdagangan internasional dibatasi oleh berlakunya ketentuan-ketentuan dalam World Trade Organization (WTO), terutama bagi negara-negara yang telah meratifikasi GATT/WTO. Apabila negara mengeluarkan aturan dan/atau kebijakan yang bertentangan dengan ketentuan WTO akan  mengakibatkan negara tersebut digugat oleh negara lain. Seperti yang terjadi dengan kebijakan yang dikeluarkan oleh Australia. Indonesia menggugat Australia ke WTO atas aturan dan/atau kebijakan kemasan polos produk rokok (The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011) yang diberlakukan oleh Australia. Kebijakan tersebut dianggap bertentangan dengan ketentuan WTO, khususnya ketentuan TRIPS (Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan memperhatikan bahan hukum seperti asas-asas hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, konvensi internasional, serta perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan masalah The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act. Dari hasil penelitian dapat terlihat pertimbangan WTO dalam kasus ini. Selain itu, terlihat juga keuntungan dan kekurangan dari pemberlakuan The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act ke depannya.

Kata kunci: WTO/GATT, The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, Hukum Ekonomi Internasional


Keywords


WTO; GATT; The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act; international economic law; Hukum Ekonomi Internasional



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/lr.v20i1.2437

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books

Acharyya, Rajat & Saibal Kar. International Trade and Economic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672851.001.0001

Adolf, Huala. Hukum Perdagangan Internasional: Prinsip-Prinsip dan Konsepsi Dasar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2004.

Koul, Autar Krishen. Guide to the WTO and GATT: Economics, Law and Politics. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2089-7

Norton, Roger D. The Competitiveness of Tropical Agriculture: A Guide to Competitive Potential with Case Studies. London: Academic Press, 2017.

Scientific Journals

A.K., Syahmin. “Analisis tentang Tobacco Plain Packaging Act in Australia dan Implikasinya terhadap Perdagangan Internasional Indonesia”. Simbur Cahaya, Vol. XXIV, No. 3, September, 2017.

Alemanno, Alberto, & Enrico Bonadio. “Do You Mind My Smoking? Plain Packaging of Cigarettes Under the TRIPS Agreement”. The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 10, 2011.

Arcuri, Alessandra. “International Economic Law Meets Lifestyle Risks: What Role for International Standards?”. European Journal of Risk Regulation, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00003196

Bond, Catherine. “Tobacco Plain Packaging in Australia: JT International Sa V. Commonwealth and Beyond”. QUT Law Review, Volume 17, Issue 2, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v17i2.702

Fahri, Muhammad Azhar. “Kemenangan Australia dalam Tuntutan Anggota WTO Mengenai Kebijakan Kemasan Polos pada Bungkus Rokok dan Produk Tembakau”. Journal of International Relations, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2018. https://doi.org/10.30997/jah.v4i1.1158

Freeman, Becky, Simon Chapman & Matthew Rimmer. “The Case for the Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products”, Addiction Review, Vol. 103, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02145.x

Kelly, Lucas G. “Smoke ’Em If You Got ’Em: Discussing the WTO Dispute Settlement Panel’s Decision to Uphold Plain Packaging in Australia and Its Impact on the Future”. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, Vol. 35, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3115849

Kennedy, Mary Scott. “Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act: Convergence of Public Health and Global Trade”. North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation, Vol. 34, 2013.

Khabiburohman, Muhammad Dwi, Wicipto Setiadi, & Suherman. “Penolakan Gugatan Indonesia oleh WTO atas Kebijakan Australia Mengenai Kemasan Rokok Polos”. Jurnal Esensi Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 1, December, 2019.

Korah, Revy S.M. “Prinsip-Prinsip Eksistensi General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) dan World Trade Organization (WTO) dalam Era Pasar Bebas, Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, Vol. 22, No. 7, August, 2016.

Lease, Kristen. “Smoke ‘Em If You Got ‘Em: Intellectual Property Rights in the Tobacco Industry Going Up in Smoke”. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law. Vol. 46, 2016.

Satriyanti, Batara. “Kebijakan the Tobacco Plain Packaging di Australia”. e-Journal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2019.

Papers

Sun, Peng & Almas Heshmati. “International Trade and its Effects on Economic Growth in China”, Discussion Paper No. 5151, IZA DP No. 5151. Institute for the Study of Labor, 2010.

International Agreements

Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

General Agreement on Tariff and Trade 1994

Internet

“Indonesia Menggugat Australia di WTO terkait Kebijakan Rokok Berkemasan Polos”. http://igj.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/STUKAS-WTO-INDONESIA AUSTRALIA.pdf

Julianto, Pramdia Arhando. “Kemasan Rokok Polos Bisa Kurangi Ekspor Produk Tembakau Indonesia”. https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2017/10/03/201500426/kemasan-rokok-polos-bisa-kurangi-ekspor-produk-tembakau-indonesia


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Law Review

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 
slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor