PILIHAN HUKUM DALAM THE HAGUE PRINCIPLES 2015 [Choice of Law in the Hague Principles 2015]

Priskila Pratita Penasthika


This article aims to introduce The Hague Principles 2015 to the discourses of choice of law and private international law in Indonesia. Various attempts to harmonize choice of law have been undertaken since the second half of the twentieth century. Those attempts remain to continue to the twenty-first century and are marked, among others, by the issuance of The Hague Principles 2015. This harmonization instrument has been drawing attention and debates due to its nature as a non-binding instrument, and some novel provisions it introduces that have never been explicitly addressed in the previous harmonization instruments on choice of law.

Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk memperkenalkan The Hague Principles 2015 dalam diskusi-diskusi mengenai pilihan hukum dan hukum perdata internasional di Indonesia. Sejak paruh kedua abad ke-20 telah dimulai berbagai usaha untuk mengharmonisasi aturan-aturan mengenai pilihan hukum dalam kontrak. Usaha ini terus berlanjut di abad ke-21 dan ditandai salah satunya dengan terbitnya The Hague Principles 2015. Instrumen harmonisasi ini mengundang banyak perhatian dan perdebatan karena sifatnya sebagai sebuah instrumen yang tidak mengikat, dan beberapa ketentuan di dalamnya yang belum pernah diatur secara tegas dalam instrumen-instrumen harmonisasi mengenai pilihan hukum sebelumnya.


The Hague Principles 2015; Choice of Law; Private International Law; Pilihan Hukum; Hukum Perdata Internasional

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/lr.v0i0.3148

Full Text:



International Treaties/Perjanjian Internasional

Appendix to the Uruguayan Civil Code (Apendice del Titulo Final de Este Código - República Oriental del Uruguay Codigo Civil, diperbaharui 26 Februari 2010).

Convention of 15 Juni 1955 on the Law Applicable to International Sales of Goods, U.N.T.S 147, berlaku 1 September 1964.

Convention of 22 Desember 1986 on the Law Applicable to Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 24 ILM 1575.

Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations 19 Juni 1980 (80/934/EEC). OJL 226, 9 Oktober 1980, berlaku 1 April 1991.

Council Regulation (EC) 593/08 of 17 Juni 2008 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations [2008] OJL 177/6.

Inter-American Convention on the Law Applicable to International Contracts 17 Maret 1994, 33 ILM 733, berlaku 15 Desember 1996.

Ley General de Derecho Internacional Privado 130 C/619/2020, 17 November 2020.

OAS Guide on the Law Applicable to International Commercial Contracts in the Americas, AG/RES. 2930 (XLIX-O/19), 27 Juni 2019.

Paraguayan Law Number 5393 of 2015 regarding the Applicable Law to International Contracts, 15 Januari 2015 (LEY N° 5393.- Sobre el derecho aplicable a los contratos internacionales).

Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts, 19 Maret 2015.

Statute of the Hague Conference on Private International Law on 31 Oktober 1951 as amended on 30 September 2006, 220 U.N.T.S. 123.

The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016, Rome 2016.

United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods 1980, 1489 U.N.T.S 3.


Basedow, Jürgen. “The Law of Open Societies – Private Ordering and Public Regulation of International Relations.” In Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International 360. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2013.

Briggs, Adrian. Agreements on Jurisdiction and Choice of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Gautama, Sudargo. Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia Jilid II, Bagian 4, Buku ke-5. Bandung, Indonesia: Alumni, 1991.

Gautama, Sudargo. Pengantar Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia. Bandung, Indonesia: Binacipta, 1977.

Liang, Jieying. Party Autonomy in Contractual Choice of Law in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Michaels, Ralf. “Non-State Law in the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Contracts.” In Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation – Liber Amicorum Hans Micklitz, edited by Kai Purnhagen & Peter Rott, 43-69. New York: Springer, 2014.

Mills, Alex. Party Autonomy in Private International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Nishitani, Yuko. “Party Autonomy and Its Restrictions by Mandatory Rules in Japanese Private International Law: Contractual Conflicts Rules.” In Japanese and European Private International Law in Comparative Perspective, edited by J. Basedow, H. Baum & Y. Nishitani, 77-103. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.

Nygh, Peter. Autonomy in International Contracts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.

O’Hara, Erin A. & Larry E. Ribstein. The Law Market. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Penasthika, Priskila Pratita. “Hukum yang Berlaku untuk Kontrak menurut The Hague Principles of Choice of Law in International Contracts: Suatu Orientasi Baru untuk Indonesia.” In Bunga Rampai Percikan Pemikiran Makara Merah dari FHUI untuk Indonesia, edited by Heru Susetyo, 269-86. Depok, Indonesia: Badan Penerbit FHUI, 2018.

Rodríguez, José Antonio Moreno. “The New Paraguayan Law on International Contracts: Back to the Past?” In Eppur si muove: The Age of Uniform Law 2 – Essays in honour of Michael Joachim Bonell to celebrate his 70th birthday, edited by Michael Joachim Bonell, 1146-78. Rome: UNIDROIT, 2016.

Symeonides, Symeon C. American Private International Law. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2008.

Symeonides, Symeon C. Codifying Choice of Law Around the World - An International Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

van Calster, Geert. European Private International Law, 2nd ed. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2016.

Weintraub, Russel J. “Functional Developments in Choice of Law for Contracts.” In Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International 187, 239-305. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 1984.

Weintraub, Russel J. Commentary on the Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. New York: The Foundation Press Inc., 1986.

Scientific Journals/Jurnal Ilmiah

Albornoz, María Mercedes. “Choice of Law in International Contracts in Latin American Legal Systems.” Journal of Private International Law 6, no. 1 (April 2010): 23-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/17536235.2010.11424372

Al-Fadhel, Faisal M. “Respect for Party Autonomy under Current Saudi Arbitration Law.” Arab Law Quarterly 23, no. 1 (February 2009): 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1163/157302509X395632

Amgad Husein & Jonathan Burns. “Choice of Forum in Contract with Saudi Arabian Counterparties: An Analysis of the DIFC Common Law Courts from a Saudi Arabian Perspective.” The International Lawyer 48, no. 3 (2015): 179-90.

Bonell, Michael Joachim. “Soft Law and Party Autonomy: The Case of UNIDROIT Principles.” Loyola Law Review 51, no. 2 (2005): 229-52.

Ehrenzweig, A. A. “The Statute of Frauds in the Conflict of Laws: Basic Rule of Validation.” Columbia Law Review 59, no.6 (June 1959): 874-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/1120240

Ehrenzweig, A. A. “Contracts in the Conflict of Laws – Part One: Validity.” Columbia Law Review 59, no. 7 (November 1959): 973-1025. https://doi.org/10.2307/1120001

Friedler, Edith. “Party Autonomy Revisited: A Statutory Solution to A Choice-of-Law Problem.” University of Kansas Law Review 37, no. 3 (1989): 471-528.

Geoffrey P. Miller & Theodore Eisenberg. “The Market for Contracts.” Cardozo Law Review 30, no. 5 (May 2009): 2073-98.

Lehmann, Matthias. “Liberating the Individual from Battles between States: Justifying Party Autonomy in Conflict of Laws.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 41 (2008): 381-434.

Mankowski, Peter. “Article 3 of the Hague Principles: The Final Breakthrough for the Choice of Non-State Law.” Uniform Law Review 22, no. 2 (June 2017): 369-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unx016

Marshall, Brooke. “The Hague Choice of Law Principles, CISG, and PICC: A Hard Look at a Choice of Soft Law.” American Journal of Comparative Law 66, no. 1 (April 2018): 175-217. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avy007

Mettala, Kimmo. “Governing-Law Clauses of Loan Agreements in International Project Financing.” The International Lawyer 20, no. 1 (1986): 219-45.

Moonsook, Kim. “On the Korean Private International Law.” Japanese Yearbook of International Law 51 (2008): 327-40.

Nishitani, Yuko. “Party Autonomy in Contemporary Private International Law – The Hague Principles on Choice of law and East Asia.” Japanese Yearbook of International Law 59 (2016): 300-44.

Penasthika, Priskila Pratita. “Urgensi Akses terhadap Apostille Convention bagi Negara-Negara Anggota ASEAN dalam Menyongsong Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN 2015, Perspektif Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia.” Supremasi Hukum - Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 24, no. 2 (August 2015): 149-63. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.24.2.149-163

Rodríguez, José Antonio Moreno. “Contract and Non-State Law in Latin America.” Uniform Law Review 16 (2011): 877-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/16.4.877

Rodríguez, José Antonio Moreno. “Beyond the Mexico Convention and the Hague Principles: What's Next for the Americas.” Uniform Law Review 22, no. 2 (June 2017): 435-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unx017

Saumier, Genevieve. “Article 3 of the Hague Principles: A Response to Peter Mankowski.” Uniform Law Review 22, no. 2 (June 2017): 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unx019

Stringer, Dana. “Choice of Law and Choice of Forum in Brazilian International Commercial Contracts: Party Autonomy, International Jurisdiction, and the Emerging Third Way.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 44, no. 33 (2006): 959-91.

Undurraga, Maria Ignacia Vial. “Party Autonomy in Latin America: A Pending Task.” Revista Chilena de Derecho 45, no. 2 (2018): 453-78. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34372018000200453

Undurraga, Maria Ignacia Vial. “International Contracts in Latin America: History of a Slow Pace towards the Acceptance of Party Autonomy.” Revista de Derecho Privado 38 (2020): 241-76.

Wolff, Martin. “The Choice of Law by the Parties in International Contracts.” Juridical Review 49, no. 2 (1937): 110-32.

Wolff, Martin. “Some Observations on the Autonomy of Contracting Parties in the Conflict of Laws.” Transactions of the Grotius Society 35 (1949): 143-55.


HCCH. “Feasibility Study on the Choice of Law in International Contracts – Report on Work Carried Out and Suggested Work Programme for the Development of a Future Instrument Doc.7 – March 2009.” 29 Desember 2020. https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/contracts-preparatory-work.

HCCH. “Paraguay Promulgates the Law based on the Draft Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts.” 29 December 2020. https://www.hcch.net/en/news-archive/details/?varevent=392.

HCCH. “Status Table: Arbitration Centres and the HCCH Principles.” 29 December 2020. https://assets.hcch.net/docs/b9627fbb-eac1-4aae-a23c-ef059e24849e.pdf.

HCCH. “The Hague Convention 1955 Status Table.” 29 December 2020. https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=31.

HCCH. “The Hague Convention 1986 Status Table.” 29 December 2020. https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=61.

Linkedin. “Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH).” 29 December 2020. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hague-conference-on-private-international-law_hcch-choiceoflaw-arbitration-activity-6722181069262639104-td3t.

OAS. “B-56: Inter-American Convention on the Law Applicable to International Contract.” 29 December 2020. https://www.oas.org/juridico/english/sigs/b-56.html.

OAS. “Who We Are.” 29 December 2020. http://www.oas.org/en/about/who_we_are.asp.

Penasthika, Priskila Pratita. “Indonesia to Accede to the Hague Apostille Convention.” Accessed on 14 March 2021. https://eapil.org/2021/03/09/indonesia-to-accede-to-the-hague-apostille-convention/.

Trans Lex. “Principles of European Contract Law.” 29 December 2020. https://www.trans-lex.org/400200/_/pecl/.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Priskila Pratita Penasthika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.