Evaluating The Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation In Treating Neurodegenerative Cerebellar Ataxia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors

  • Angelina Wandana Universitas Pelita Harapan https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3522-8252
  • Jeanne Alexandra Universitas Indonesia
  • Agung Junnata Universitas Trisakti
  • Daniel Natanael Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Raisa Kireyna Nurfajrina Universitas Kristen Indonesia
  • Michelle Valencia Bunjamin Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19166/lijn.v1i3.10400

Keywords:

Neurodegenerative ataxia, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Sham-controlled

Abstract

Introduction: Neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple system atrophy (MSA), spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA), and Friedreich’s ataxia (FRDA) progressively impair the nervous system, affecting approximately 15% of the global population. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive method, may promote neuroplasticity. The cerebellum, central to motor control and neural connectivity, is a promising rTMS target. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the efficacy of
rTMS in treating neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxia.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted per PRISMA guidelines, searching ten databases (to August 9, 2025). Eligible studies were RCTs comparing rTMS with sham in cerebellar ataxia. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251127471). Study quality was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.0; meta-analysis used Review Manager 5.4.1, and meta-regression was performed in
JASP 0.19.3.
Results: Seven RCTs involving a total of 256 patients were included. rTMS significantly improved SARA (SMD = -0.84, p = 0.004, I² = 73%). ICARS showed no significant difference (SMD = -0.82, p = 0.43, I² = 96%). Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were done to find key heterogeneity sources. Most studies had low bias.
Conclusions: rTMS significantly improves SARA scores in neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxia if compared to sham, while ICARS shows insignificant differences. Further research is needed.
Keywords: Neurodegenerative ataxia, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Sham-controlled

References

1. Hafiz M, Sumaiya A, De Jesus O. Ataxia. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 [cited 2025 Oct 13]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562284/

2.Lin CYR, Yeh TH, CM, Lin JL, Wang HL, Soong BW, et al. Cognitive, emotional, and other non-motor symptoms of spinocerebellar ataxias. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024 Jan 25;24(3):47–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-024 01331-4

3. Bhandari J, Thada PK, Samanta D. Spinocerebellar ataxia. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 2025 Sept 15]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557816/

4. Rudaks LI, Yeow D, Ng K, Deveson IW, Kennerson ML, Kumar KR. An update on the adult-onset hereditary cerebellar ataxias: novel genetic causes and new diagnostic approaches. Cerebellum. 2024 May 18;23(5):2152–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-02401703-z.

5. Perlman S. Hereditary ataxia overview. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 2025 [cited 2025 Sept 15]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1138/

6. Gandini J, Biasini F, Pizzarotti B, CalandraBuonaura G, Guaraldi P, Contin M, et al. The neurological update: therapies for cerebellar ataxias in 2020. J Neurol. 2020 Apr 30;267(4):1211–20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-02009717-3.

7. Cui, Zi-Ting, et al. Spinocerebellar Ataxias: From Pathogenesis to Recent Therapeutic Advances. Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 18, 4 June 2024, Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1422442.

8. Mann SK, Malhi NK. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 2025 Sept 15]. Available from:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK568715/

9. Hussain S, Chamoli S, Fitzgerald P, Gandhi A, Gill S, Sarma S, et al. Royal Australian and New Zealand

College of Psychiatrists professional practice guidelines for the administration of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;58(8):641–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241249846

10. Benussi A, Batsikadze G, França C, Cury RG, Maas RPPWM. The therapeutic potential of non-invasive and invasive cerebellar stimulation techniques in hereditary ataxias. Cells. 2023 Apr 20;12(8):1193.

Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12081193

11. Song P, Li S, Wang S, Wei H, Lin H, Wang Y. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum improves ataxia and cerebello-fronto plasticity in multiple system atrophy: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled and TMSEEG study. Aging. 2020 Oct

21;12(20):20611–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103946

12. Li D, Jiang C, Liu J, Fan Y, Hao X, Fu M, et al. Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation on the bilateral cerebellum to improve symptoms of ataxia with multiple system atrophy: a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study. Neurol Sci. 2025 Apr;46(4):1875–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-02508001-4

13. França C, De Andrade DC, Silva V, Galhardoni R, Barbosa ER, Teixeira MJ, et al. Effects of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on ataxias: a randomized trial. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2020 Nov;80:1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.09.001

14. XY, Lian YH, Liu XH, Sikandar A, Li MC, Xu HL, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cerebellar metabolism in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Apr 25;14:827993. Available from:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.827993

15. Manor B, Greenstein PE, Davila-Perez P, Wakefield S, Zhou J, Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in spinocerebellar ataxia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2019

Feb 12;10:73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00073

16. Shiga Y. Transcranial magnetic stimulation alleviates truncal ataxia in spinocerebellar degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Jan 1;72(1):124–6.Available from:https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.72.1.124

17. Sikandar A, Liu XH, Xu HL, Li Y, Lin YQ, XY, et al. Short-term efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in SCA3: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2023 Jan;106:105236. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.105236

18. Zhi W, Li Y, Wang L, Hu X. Advancing neuroscience and therapy: insights into genetic and non-genetic neuromodulation approaches. Cells. 2025 Jan 15;14(2):122. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14020122

19. Jayathilake NJ, Phan TT, Kim J, Lee KP, Park JM. Modulating neuroplasticity for chronic pain relief: noninvasive neuromodulation as a promising approach. Exp Mol Med 57, 501–514 (2025). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-02501409-0

20. Lin YC, Kuo SH, Lin CP, Chang LH. The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2025 Jun;88(6):417–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001243

21. Pauly MG, Steinmeier A, Bolte C, Hamami F, Tzvi E, Münchau A, et al. Cerebellar rTMS and PAS effectively induce cerebellar plasticity. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3070. from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-02182496-7

22. SY, Tsou MH, KY, Liu YC, Lin MT. Impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis utilizing functional near-infrared spectroscopy evaluation. J NeuroengRehabil. 2024 Jun 24;21(1):108. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984 024-01407-9

23. Afifi SY. A new era of current and future treatment applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry 15;60(1):54. Neurosurg. Available 2024 from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-02400825-9

24. Ciricugno A, Paternò S, Barbati N, Borgatti R, Cattaneo Z, Ferrari C. Advances in cerebellar TMS therapy: an updated systematic review on multi-session interventions. Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 27;13(7):1578. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071578

25. Ozdemir RA, Boucher P, Fried PJ, Momi D, Jannati A, Pascual-Leone A, et al. Reproducibility of cortical response modulation induced by intermittent and continuous theta-burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2021 Jul–Aug;14(4):949–64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.05.013

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Wandana, A., Alexandra, J., Junnata, A., Natanael, D., Nurfajrina , R. K., & Bunjamin, M. V. (2025). Evaluating The Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation In Treating Neurodegenerative Cerebellar Ataxia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lumina : Indonesian Journal of Neurology, 1(3), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.19166/lijn.v1i3.10400