The Construction of Fair Use of Copyright and Compensation System for Artificial Intelligence Creation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v6i1.9905Kata Kunci:
Artificial Intelligence, Administrative Review, Acquisition, Copyright Compensation SystemAbstrak
The AI-generated works must intersect with the right holder’s work, thus having a certain impact on the rights and interests of the right holder’s work. The law needs to explore and improve the regulation of the fair use of AI creations and build a compensation system to adapt to the development of AI. The development of AI technology has brought about problems such as the unclear relationship between fair use and infringement of copyright, the unclear general terms and conditions of application, and the incomplete criteria for judging at different stages. Through different theoretical methods, the legitimacy of the rational use of the system can be demonstrated. The compensation standard for fair use of copyright in AI creation can refer to the market pricing of the right holder's work, and the compensation can construct a formula for the amount of damages for AI copyright infringement. The compensation standard should be based on the main factors affecting the market value of the work, so as to provide a reference for the compensation system of the fair use works generated by AI.
Referensi
Authors Guild v. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2014). https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/authorsguild-hathitrust-2dcir2014.pdf.
Blanch v. Koons, 467 F.3d 244 (2d Cir. 2006). https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/blanch-koons-2dcir2006.pdf.
Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694 (2d Cir. 2013). https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/cariou-prince-2dcir2013.pdf.
Chu, Meng. “The Challenges and Responses of Artificial Intelligence to the Copyright Infringement Liability System.” Northern Law Science, no. 1 (2021).
Civil Judgment of the People’s Court of Haidian District, Beijing Municipality, No. 22602 [First Instance] Min Chu of (2017) Jing 0108.
Educational Testing Service v. Katzman, 793 F.2d 533 (3d Cir. 1986). https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/eductesting-katzman-3dcir1986.pdf.
Gordon, Wendy. “Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and Its Predecessors.” Columbia Law Review (1982).
Jiang, Huasheng. “The Market Value of Intellectual Property Damages and the Legal Structure of Judicial Adjudication Rules.” Intellectual Property, no. 7 (2017).
Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811 (9th Cir. 2003). https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/kelly-arriba-9thcir2003.pdf.
Kong, Xiangjun. “The Overall, Market and Development Concept in the Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property.” People’s Justice, no. 1 (2014).
Lei, Bingde, M. J. Copyright Law. Beijing: Law Press, 2005.
Liu, Qiang. Research on Legal Issues of Intellectual Property Rights in Artificial Intelligence. Beijing: Law Press, 2020.
Ma, Wei. “Research on the Fair Use System in Artificial Intelligence Creation.” Master’s thesis, Shanghai Normal University, 2021.
Ma, Zhongfa, and Xiao Yulu. “Copyright Protection of Artificial Intelligence Creations.” Electronic Intellectual Property, no. 6 (2019).
Ma, Zhongfa, and Xiao Yulu. “The Infringement Dilemma and Way Out of Artificial Intelligence Learning and Creation.” Wuling Academic Journal, no. 5 (2019).
Mei, Shuwen, and Song Ge. “On the Application of the Copyright Fair Use System to Artificial Intelligence Editing.” China Editor, no. 4 (2019).
Mei, Shuwen. “Legislative Improvement of the Fair Use of the Right of Information Network Communication.” Law Science, no. 6 (2008).
Mei, Shuwen. “On the User Rights in the Copyright Protection of Technological Measures.” Intellectual Property, no. 1 (2015).
Mei, Shuwen. Copyright Law: Principles, Norms and Examples. Beijing: Intellectual Property Press, 2014.
Mei, Shuwen. Research on the Response and Reform of the Copyright System in the Integrated Development of Emerging Media. Beijing: Intellectual Property Press, 2021.
Penguin Books USA v. New Christian Church, 288 F. Supp. 2d 544 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/288/544/2509276/.
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google Inc., 416 F. Supp. 2d 828 (C.D. Cal. 2006). https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/416-f-supp-2d-602163402.
Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Accolade, Inc., 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992). https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/segaenters-accolade-9thcir1992.pdf.
Sobel, Benjamin. “Artificial Intelligence’s Fair Use Crisis.” Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 40, no. 2 (2017).
Su, Chang. Research on the Infringement of Artificial Intelligence Creation. Master’s thesis, Jilin University, 2020.
Thubias Wright. Germany Copyright Law. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2019.
Wu, Handong. “Institutional Arrangements and Legal Regulation in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.” Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), no. 12 (2017).
Wu, Handong. Intellectual Property Law. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2005.
Yang, Xudong. “Exploration of Fair Use in Artificial Intelligence Editing.” Science and Technology and Law, no. 1 (2020).
Yang, Zhenbo. “Judicial Application of the Rules for the Transformative Use of Works.” Master’s thesis, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 2022.
Yao, Hewei. “The Positioning and Application of Transaction Cost and Price Discrimination Theory in the Fair Use of Copyright.” Intellectual Property, no. 3 (2012).
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Shen Xiaoyun, Li Xiaofu
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
Faculty of Law | Universitas Pelita Harapan | glr@uph.edu