The Plea Bargaining System as a Criminalization Model Under the Law Number 19 Year of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transaction Act and the Dignified Justice

Rinto Wardana

Abstract


From the perspective of economic analysis of law theory, the increasing number of criminal convictions  would indicate that the Indonesian  criminal Code and regulations have not been  effective in reducing the rate of crimes. By combining a preliminary hearing, hearing of cases through a special route and the application of the principle of bargaining for sentence in the plea bargaining system, a new mechanism may be formulated in the Indonesia criminal justice proceedings. This criminal justice approach employs the dignified justice principle (teori keadilan bermartabat) approach, whereby, the trial of cases using a preliminary hearing as a special route under a sole judge that is intended for an accused who pleads guilty and bargains for a sentence. Accordingly, this research attempts  to explore the use of the principles of the plea bargaining system as a criminal justice model under the Law Number 19 year of 2016 on the Electronic Information and Transaction Act (“EIT Act”). Equally important, this research employs the juridical-normative method, statute, case, and conceptual approaches in order to obtain a comprehensive result. 


Keywords


Plea Bargaining System; Indonesia Criminal Justice System; Theory of Dignified Justice; Indonesian Law on Electronic Information and Transaction Act



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/glr.v1i2.4098

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adji, Indriyanto Seno. Hukum Pidana (KUHP & KUHAP) Perkembangan Dan Permasalahan. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2014.

_______. Peradilan & KUHAP Catatan Mendatang. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2015.

Adji, Oemar Seno, and Indriyanto Seno Adji. Peradilan Bebas & Contempt of Court. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2007.

_______. Humanisme Dan Pembaharuan Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Kompas, 2009.

Atmasasmita, Romli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Perspektif Eksistensialisme Dan Abolisionisme. Bandung: Binacipta, 1996.

_______. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana, n.d.

Conboy, Maria G. S. Soetopo, and Indriyanto Seno Adji. Economic Analysis of Law Krisis Keuangan Dan Kebijakan Pemerintah. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2015.

Curzon, L. B. Dictionary of Law. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 2002.

Garner, B. A. Black’s Law Dictionary. 8th ed. Thomson West, 1999.

Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa. Bandung: P.T. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997.

Husin, Kadri, and Budi Rizki Husin. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Latifah, Marfuatul. “Pengaturan Jalur Khusus Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (The Exceptional Strip Provisions in the Criminal Procedure Bill).” Negara Hukum 5, no. 1 (2014): 31–45. https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/209.

Loqman, Loebby. Pra Peradilan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990.

Marbun, Rocky. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Suatu Pengantar. Malang: Setara Press, 2015.

Marpaung, Leden. Unsur-Unsur Perbuatan Yang Dapat Dihukum (Delik). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1991.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.

Nelson, Febby Mutiara. Plea Bargaining & Deferred Prosecution Agreement Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020.

Prasetyo, Teguh. Keadilan Bermartabat Perspektif Teori Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2015.

Purnomo, Bambang. Pola Dasar Teori Asas Umum Hukum Acara Pidana Dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1993.

Ramadhan, Choky Risda. “Jalur Khusus” & Plea Bargaining. Depok: Masyrakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia, 2015. http://mappifhui.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/891632jalur-khusus_plea-bargaining_crr_edited_mappi.pdf.

_______. “Media Hukum Dan Keadilan.” Teropong 1, no. Agustus (2014).

Reksodiputro, Mardjono. “Beberapa Catatan Tentang Justice Collaborator Dan Bentuk Perlindungannya.” Jakarta, n.d.

Santoso, Topo, and Choky Risda Ramadhan. Prapenuntutan Dan Perkembangan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: P.T. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2019.

Schaffmeister, Keizer, and E. P. H. Sutorius. Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1995.

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 1995.

Rancangan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor ... Tahun ... tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. (n.d.). https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Rancangan-KUHAP.pdf

The Constitutional Court's decision on the judicial review of Article 27(3) of the EIT Act No. 50/PUU-VI/2008 submitted by Narliswandi Piliang (also known as Iwan Piliang).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Rinto Wardana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

favicon Faculty of Law | Universitas Pelita Harapan | glr@uph.edu