Pancasila Principle of Justice in the Regulation of (Conventional) Insurance Standard Contract in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v5i1.8268Trefwoorden:
Pancasila Principle of Justice, Insurance Standard ContractSamenvatting
The purpose of this research is to analyze the ideal regulation provide protection for the insured in the statutory provisions related to Indonesia’s conventional insurance standard contract in order to realize the Pancasila principle of justice. This research uses normative legal research methods, the application of which is rational theoretical, so the disclosure is tied to methods based on deductive logic requirements. The ideal regulations that can provide protection for the insured, carried out through the formation of regulations and implementing regulations, they are formed in stages and based on other norms in the series of legal systems. The objectives of the establishment include external and internal legal protection, as well as creating certain equality and restrictions to protect those with weaker bargaining positions. The regulations formed are applied simultaneously with supervisory measures, concrete sanctions, the content of regulations is formed from within the law and has an impact on society, and the values contained in the regulations are intrinsic Pancasila, which then the regulations are consistently obeyed by all parties. The intrinsic values of Pancasila are realized through the application of the Pancasila principle of justice in the regulation of conventional insurance standard contract in Indonesia by applying the Pancasila triangle of justice interrelation.
Referenties
Ali, Zainudin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, and M. Ali Safa’at. Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2022.
Asshiddiqie, Jimmly. Menuju Negara Hukum yang Demokratis. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2009.
Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus. Aneka Hukum Bisnis. Bandung: PT Alumni, 2005.
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. “Naskah Akademik RUU tentang Usaha Perasuransian.” https://berkas.dpr.go.id/arsip/file/Lampiran/leg_1-20200612-093857-6749.pdf.
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. “Risalah Rapat Badan Musyawarah DPR RI tentang Pembahasan RUU tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, tanggal 3 Desember 1998.” https://berkas.dpr.go.id/perpustakaan/sipinter/files/sipinter-2957-255-20230131092733.pdf.
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. “Risalah Rapat Komisi XI DPR RI, Rapat Dengar Pendapat Umum tentang Pembahasan RUU Perasuransian, tanggal 9 Januari 2013.” https://berkas.dpr.go.id/akd/dokumen/K11_laporan_Lapasing_RDPU.pdf
Farnsworth, E. Allen. Contracts 2nd edition. London: Little Brown & Co Law & Business, 1990.
Freije, Katherine E. Corpus Juris Secundum: A Contemporary Statement of American Law as Derived from Reported Cases and Legislation Vol. 17. Danvers: Thomson Reuters, 2020.
Friedmann, W. Legal Theory, 5th ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1967.
Gunawan, Johannes, and Bernadette M. Waluyo. Perjanjian Baku, Masalah dan Solusi. Jakarta: GIZ/PROTECT, 2021.
Hersbergen, Ronald L.. “Unconscionability: The Approach of the Louisiana Civil Code.” Louisiana Law Review 43 (1983): 1315–1453. https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol43/iss6/1/.
Hodgin, Ray. Insurance Law. London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1998.
Indrati S., Maria Farida. Ilmu Perundang-undangan, Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2014.
Isnaeni, Moch.. Seberkas Diorama Hukum Kontrak. Surabaya: Revka Petra Media, 2018.
Keeton, Robert E.. Basic Text on Insurance Law. St. Paul, Minn: West Publishing Co., 1971.
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Translated by Raisul Muttaqien. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2010.
Kessler, Friedrich. “Contract of Adhesion-Some Thought about Freedom of Contract, Role of Compulsion in Economic Transactions.” Columbia Law Review 43 (1943): 629–642. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=11639&context=journal_articles.
Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. Konsep-Konsep Hukum Dalam Pembangunan. Bandung: PT Alumni, 2006.
Looney, J.W., and Anita K. Poole. “Adhesion Contracts, Bad Faith, and Economically Faulty Contracts.” Drake Journal of Agricultural Law 4 (1999): 177–195. https://nationalaglawcenter.org/publication/download/looney-poole-adhesion-contracts-bad-faith-and-economically-faulty-contracts-4-drake-j-agricultural-l-177-195-1996/.
Mughal, Arham. Arbitration Clauses: The Louisiana Supreme Court’s Flawed Decision in Duhon v. Activelaf, LLC. And Why the Doctrine of Unconscionability Should Be Adopted in Louisiana (February 28, 2018). SSRN.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Asuransi Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.
Notonagoro. Pancasila Secara Ilmiah Populer. Jakarta: PT Bina Aksara, 1983.
Purbacaraka, Purnadi, and A. Ridwan Halim. Filsafat Hukum Perdata dalam Tanya Jawab. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 1995.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Sisi-sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Buku Kompas, 2009.
Rakoff, Todd D.. “Contracts of Adhesion: An Essay in Reconstruction.” Harvard Law Review 96, no. 6 (April 1983): 1173–1284. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1341009.
Randall, Susan. “Freedom of Contract in Insurance." Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 25 (2007): 107–147. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cilj/25/.
Rawls, John A. Theory of Justice, Revise Edition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Rawls, John. Teori Keadilan: Dasar-Dasar Filsafat Politik untuk mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Sosial dan Negara (A Theory of Justice). Translated by Uzair Fauzan dan Heru Prasetyo. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.
Samsul, Inosentius. Perlindungan Konsumen, Kemungkinan Penerapan Tanggung Jawab Mutlak. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia, 2004.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. “Kebebasan Berkontrak dan Perlindungan Yang Seimbang Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank di Indonesia.” Disertation, Universitas Indonesia, 1993.
Sugianto, Fajar, Yuber Lago, and Laurenzia Luna. “State Law, Integral Economic Justice, and Better Regulatory Practices: Promoting Economic Efficiency in Indonesia.” Global Legal Review 3, no. 2 (October 2023): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v3i2.6552.
Wahjono, Padmo. Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: CV Rajawali, 1982.
Zhang, Mo. "Contractual Choice of Law in Contracts of Adhesion and Party Autonomy." Akron Law Review 41, No. 1 (2008): 123–173. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1017841.
##submission.downloads##
Gepubliceerd
Citeerhulp
Nummer
Sectie
Licentie
Copyright (c) 2025 Andri Christian
Dit werk wordt verdeeld onder een Naamsvermelding-GelijkDelen 4.0 Internationaal licentie.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
Faculty of Law | Universitas Pelita Harapan | glr@uph.edu