IMPROVING EFL STUDENTS’ WRITING THROUGH PEER TUTORING [MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN MENULIS MAHASISWA PEMBELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS SEBAGAI BAHASA ASING MELALUI TUTORING OLEH TEMAN SEBAYA]

Auteurs

  • Rentauli Mariah Silalahi Institut Teknologi Del

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19166/pji.v21i2.9619

Trefwoorden:

EFL writing challenges, peer tutoring, Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory, Zone of Proximal Development, scaffolding

Samenvatting

This study investigates the writing challenges faced by Indonesian EFL students and examines the effectiveness of peer tutoring in enhancing their writing skills. Through a mixed-methods approach, data were collected via open- and closed-ended survey responses and writing assessments’ scores to 40 students as tutees, and semi-structured interviews with 4 peer tutors. The findings indicate that students struggle primarily with vocabulary, grammar, sentence structure, and translation. These difficulties are interconnected, as limited vocabulary and grammatical knowledge hinder their ability to construct clear and coherent sentences. The results show that most students found peer tutoring beneficial, as it provided a supportive learning environment, personalized guidance, and reduced the pressure of traditional teacher-student interactions. However, some students reported minimal or no improvement, which could be attributed to factors such as lack of engagement or scheduling conflicts. These findings are analyzed through the lens of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory, particularly the concepts of the Zone of Proximal Development and scaffolding. The study highlights how peer tutoring facilitates learning by providing social interaction with more knowledgeable peers, enabling students to progress beyond their current level of competence. These insights suggest that educational institutions should integrate structured peer tutoring programs into EFL writing courses and provide teachers with the necessary training and resources to offer appropriate scaffolding tailored to students’ individual challenges. Future research should explore targeted interventions for students with lower engagement and investigate strategies to enhance the effectiveness of peer tutoring in EFL writing instruction.

Abstrak Bahasa Indonesia

 

Studi ini menyelidiki tantangan menulis yang dihadapi oleh mahasiswa EFL Indonesia dan mengkaji efektivitas tutoring teman sebaya dalam meningkatkan keterampilan menulis mereka. Melalui pendekatan mixed-methods, data dikumpulkan melalui survei dengan pertanyaan terbuka dan tertutup serta nilai-nilai penilaian writing dari 40 siswa sebagai tutee, serta wawancara semi-terstruktur dengan 4 tutor sebaya. Temuan-temuan menunjukkan bahwa siswa mengalami kesulitan, khususnya dengan kosakata, tata bahasa, struktur kalimat, dan terjemahan. Kesulitan-kesulitan tersebut saling terkait, karena kosakata dan pengetahuan tata bahasa yang terbatas menghambat kemampuan mereka untuk membuat kalimat yang jelas dan koheren. Hasil-hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar tutee merasa tutoring teman sebaya bermanfaat, karena memberikan lingkungan belajar yang mendukung, bimbingan yang personal, dan mengurangi tekanan dari interaksi tradisional antara guru dan siswa. Namun, beberapa tutee menyatakan sedikit atau tidak ada peningkatan, yang dapat dikaitkan dengan faktor-faktor seperti kurangnya keterlibatan atau konflik jadwal. Temuan-temuan tersebut dianalisis melalui lensa Teori Sosial Budaya Vygotsky, terutama konsep-konsep Zona Perkembangan Proximal (ZPD) dan scaffolding atau pendampingan. Studi ini menyoroti tutoring teman sebaya memfasilitasi pembelajaran dengan memberikan interaksi sosial dengan teman sebaya yang lebih berpengetahuan, memungkinkan siswa untuk maju melampaui tingkat kompetensi mereka saat ini. Hal-hal itu menunjukkan bahwa institusi pendidikan harus mengintegrasikan program tutoring teman sebaya yang terstruktur ke dalam mata kuliah writing EFL dan memberikan pelatihan serta sumber daya yang diperlukan kepada guru untuk melakukan scaffolding yang sesuai dengan tantangan-tantangan yang dimiliki setiap siswa. Penelitian di masa depan harus mengeksplorasi intervensi terarah untuk siswa dengan keterlibatan yang lebih rendah dan menyelidiki strategi-strategi untuk meningkatkan efektivitas tutoring teman sebaya dalam pembelajaran menulis EFL.

 

Biografie auteur

Rentauli Mariah Silalahi, Institut Teknologi Del

English Department

Referenties

Alrajhi, M. N., & Aldhafri, S. S. (2015). Peer Tutoring Effects on Omani Students’ English Self-Concept. International Education Studies, 8(6), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p184

Angraeni, L., Rosmiaty, Chuzaimah, Yuriatson, & Nur, S. R. (2024). Navigating Barriers to English Proficiency: A Qualitative Descriptive Study Among University Students in Indonesia. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Budaya Tamaddun Life, 23(2), 449–463.

Aziz, Z. A., Fitriani, S. S., & Amalina, Z. (2020). Linguistic errors made by Islamic university EFL students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 733–745.

Bacha, N. N. (2002). Developing Learners ’ Academic Writing Skills in Higher Education: A Study for Educational Reform. Language and Education, 16(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780208666826

Bolich, B. J. (2001). Peer tutoring and social behaviors: A review. International Journal of Special Education, 16(2), 1–9.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Bulqiyah, S., Mahbub, M. A., & Nugraheni, D. A. (2021). Investigating writing difficulties in essay writing: Tertiary students’ perspectives. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(1), 61–73.

Burhanuddin, A. (2020). Error analysis of English sentences written by Indonesian college students. Jurnal Ilmiah Lingua Idea, 11(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jli.2020.11.1.2154

Chai, M. S., & Lin, S. F. (2013). Perceptions of ESL student tutors on challenges faced in peer tutoring. Educational Journal, 2(4), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20130204.14

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky’s Analysis of Learning and Instruction. In S. M. (eds) Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., and Miller (Ed.), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge University Press (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.004

Chan, N. N., Phan, C. W., Salihan, A., & Dipolog-Ubanan, G. F. (2016). Peer assisted learning in higher education: Roles, perceptions and efficacy. Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(4), 1817–1828.

Colvin, J. W. (2007). Peer tutoring and social dynamics in higher education. Mentoring and Tutoring, 15(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260601086345

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Eliza, T. (2024). Enhancing learning outcomes through peer tutoring in ELT at STIFI BP Palembang. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 5752–5761.

Famularsih, S., & Helmy, M. I. (2020). A comparative study of sentence building in writing ability among students in Indonesia. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i1.1682

Febriani, T. N. (2022). “Writing is challenging”: factors contributing to undergraduate students’ difficulties in writing English essays. Erudita: Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 83–93.

Fitroh, N., Khumaira, A. N., Maulana, F., & Najicha, A. F. (2024). Peer tutor method as a dolution to improve English language skills of UIN Walisongo Semarang students. Educational Insights, 2(1), 37–48.

Flores, D. I. G. F., Ibarra, M. E. U. I., & Treviño, M. G. V. (2018). Peer tutoring as an improvement strategy for school exploitation. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.953

Foulkes, D., & Naylor, S. (2022). Exploring peer tutoring from the peer tutor’s perspective. Radiography, 28(3), 793–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.02.007

Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.665560

Isma, A., Rasmin, L. O., & Samsudin. (2023). Decoding the Challenges: A Study of English Writing Errors Among EFL Students. GLENS: Global English Insights Journal, 1(1), 1–9.

Keenan, T., Evans, S., & Crowley, K. (2016). An Introduction to Child Development (3rd editio). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Law, I. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. https://pmpk.kemdikbud.go.id/assets/docs/UU_2003_No_20_-_Sistem_Pendidikan_Nasional.pdf

Marsely, M. (2020). Peer Tutoring as One Best practice for Accounting Learning in Vocational. Journal of Accounting and Business Education, 5(1), 25–37.

Merizawati, H. (2018). An error analysis in paper presentations: A case study of Indonesian EFL learners. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 4(2), 71–103.

Mubarok, Y., & Budiono, T. (2022). An error analysis on EFL students’ writing. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i2.11386

Muchyidin, M. S. (2015). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in teaching and learning English grammar on the students’ achievement. Jurnal Cendikia, 13(3), 25–32.

Phuket, P. R. N., & Othman, N. B. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ errors in writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(32), 99–106.

Poedjiastutie, D., Akhyar, F., Hidayati, D., & Gasmi, F. N. (2018). Does Curriculum Help Students to Develop Their English Competence? A Case in Indonesia. Arab World English Journal, 9(2), 175–185.

Pozu-franco, J., & Guevara, L. M. (2023). Strengthening of learning skills supported by peer tutors. V Congreso En Docencia En Educación Superior Codes y I Congreso Latinoamericano y Del Caribe de Innovación En Investigación En Educación Superior LatinsoTl La Serena, 8–11.

Rahmasari, B. S., Munir, A., & Nugroho, H. A. (2024). The role of peer tutoring integrated with KWL charts in the development of students’ inferential skills. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2335810

Rass, R. A. (2015). Challenges face Arab students in writing well-developed paragraphs in English. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n10p49

Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2014). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional Implications and Teachers’ Professional Development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237

Silalahi, R. M. (2019). Understanding Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development for Learning. POLYGLOT, 15(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.19166/pji.v15i2.1544

Srivastava, R., & Rashid, M. (2018). Who is at edge – tutors or tutees? Academic, social and emotional elevation through peer tutoring. Arab World English Journal, 64–77.

Sudibyo, B. (2007a). Peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional Republik Indonesia nomor 25 tahun 2007 tentang persyaratan dan prosedur bagi warga negara asing untuk menjadi mahasiswa pada perguruan tinggi di Indonesia (Minister of National Education Regulation of the Republic of . Biro Hukum dan Organisasi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (Nasional-Legal and Organizational Bureau of the Ministry of National Education). http://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/Permen25-2007.pdf

Sudibyo, B. (2007b). Peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional Republik Indonesia nomor 26 Tahun 2007 tentang kerja sama perguruan tinggi di Indonesian dengan perguruan tinggi atau lembaga lain di luar negeri (Minister of National Education Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia. Biro Hukum dan Organisasi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (Legal and Organizational Bureau of the Ministry of National Education). http://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/Permen26-2007.pdf

Sudibyo, B. (2009). Peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional nomor 66 tahun 2009 tentang pemberian izin pendidik dan tenaga kependidikan asing satuan pendidikan formal dan nonformal di Indonesia (Minister of National Education Regulation Number 66 of 2009 concerning the Grantin. Biro Hukum dan Organisasi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (Nasional-Legal and Organizational Bureau of the Ministry of National Education). http://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/Permen66-2009.pdf

Sullivan, Í. O., & Cleary, L. (2014). Peer-tutoring in academic writing: infectious nature of engagement. Journal of Academic Writing, 4(1), 52–65.

Suprapto, M. A., Anditasari, A. W., Sitompul, S. K., & Setyowati, L. (2022). Undergraduate students’ perceptions towards the process of writing. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(1), 2503–1848. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.765

Surjowati, R. (2023). Error analysis on students’ essay writing: A case study. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 11(1), 252–269.

Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating Impact. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (E. Cole, Michael; John-Steiner, Vera; Scribner, Sylvia; Souberman (ed.)). Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, Lev S. (1986). Thought and Language. The MIT Press. http://www.amazon.co.jp/Thought-Language-Alex-Kozulin/dp/026251771X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1393557149&sr=8-2&keywords=thought+and+language

Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Harvard University Press.

Wertsch, J. V, & Tulviste, P. (1992). L . S . Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 548–557.

Zein, S., Sukyadi, D., Hamied, F. A., & Lengkanawati, N. S. (2020). English language education in Indonesia : A review of research ( 2011 – 2019 ). Language Teaching, 53(4), 491–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000208

##submission.downloads##

Gepubliceerd

2025-07-25

Nummer

Sectie

Articles