CONFUSING BRAINS WITH RETURNS: EVIDENCE OF INVESTOR OVERCONFIDENCE AND TRADING ACTIVITY IN THE INDONESIAN STOCK MARKET

Penulis

  • Yanuar Dananjaya Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Hananiel Menoverdi Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Priskila Napitupulu Universitas Pelita Harapan

Kata Kunci:

Investor Overconfidence, Trading Volume, Stock Return

Abstrak

This study investigates the presence of investor overconfidence in the Indonesian equity market by analyzing the lead-lag relationship between stock returns and subsequent trading activity. Focusing on the constituents of the LQ45 index from January 2023 to December 2025, we employ a firm-level panel data approach with fixed effects and clustered robust standard errors on a monthly dataset (N=1,485$). Using share turnover as a proxy for trading intensity, the analysis tests the hypothesis that past positive returns lead to increased trading volume due to biased self-attribution. The empirical results demonstrate that both contemporaneous and lagged individual stock returns exert a positive and statistically significant influence on trading activity (p < 0.05$), confirming that Indonesian investors tend to trade more aggressively following periods of capital gains. This behavioral pattern remains robust across alternative turnover specifications, including total-share and free-float-based proxies, as well as log-transformed models. Furthermore, lagged market returns exhibit a dominant positive effect, suggesting that market-wide sentiment acts as a powerful catalyst for trading frequency. These findings provide strong evidence of overconfidence-driven behavior in the Jakarta Composite Index, highlighting how psychological biases—rather than purely fundamental information—drive market liquidity and volatility in an emerging market context.

Referensi

Baker, M., and Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129–151.

Barber, B. M., and Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292.

Bhandari, G., and Deaves, R. (2006). The demographics of overconfidence. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 7(1), 5–11.

Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R., and Rui, O. M. (2007). Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4), 425–451.

Chuang, W. I., and Lee, B. S. (2006). An empirical evaluation of the overconfidence hypothesis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(9), 2489–2515.

Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., and Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1839–1885.

Glaser, M., and Weber, M. (2007). Overconfidence and trading volume. The Review of Financial Studies, 20(1), 1–35.

Griffin, J. M., Nardari, F., and Stulz, R. M. (2007). Do investors trade more when stocks have performed well? Evidence from 46 countries. The Review of Financial Studies, 20(3), 905–951.

Kustodian Sentral Efek Indonesia. (2025). Statistik publik Desember 2025. https://www.ksei.co.id/files/Statistik_Publik_Desember_2025.pdf

Odean, T. (1998). Volume, volatility, price, and profit when traders are overconfident. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1887–1934.

Shiller, R. J. (2003). From efficient markets theory to behavioral finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83–104.

Statman, M. (1999). Behavioral finance: Past battles and future engagements. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(6), 18–27.

Statman, M., Thorley, S., and Vorkink, K. (2006). Investor overconfidence and trading volume. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(4), 1531–1565.

Diterbitkan

2026-06-09