PROFIL JUSTIFIKASI SISWA DENGAN GAYA BELAJAR CONVERGER DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH POLA BILANGAN [JUSTIFICATION PROFILES OF CONVERGER LEARNERS IN NUMBER PATTERN PROBLEM SOLVING]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/johme.v10i1.11109Schlagworte:
justification, problem solving, number pattern, converger learning style, justifikasi, pemecahan masalah, pola bilangan, gaya belajar convergerAbstract
In learning mathematical concepts, justification ability is essential because it relates to students’ skills in evaluating the validity of knowledge claims. Therefore, justification plays an important role in the problem-solving process, particularly in number pattern tasks. However, students’ justification processes are still rarely associated with learning style characteristics. Accordingly, this study aims to describe the justification profile of students with a converger learning style in solving number pattern problems. This research employed a descriptive study with qualitative approach. The research subjects consisted of two eighth-grade students with a converger learning style selected purposively, resulting in two subjects categorized as converger learners. The research instruments included a learning style questionnaire, written task sheets, and interview guidelines. The main findings indicate that the converger learning style tends to encourage students, in the activity of solving number pattern problems, to provide justification in the form of deductive justification without generic example. This study illustrates that students’ tendencies in receiving and processing information can shape distinctive characteristics in their thinking processes. The findings of this study may serve as a consideration in classroom learning activities, particularly as a basis for designing tasks that facilitate the development of students’ justification abilities.
BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRACT: Dalam mempelajari konsep matematika, kemampuan justifikasi sangat penting karena berkaitan dengan keterampilan siswa dalam mengevaluasi kebenaran klaim pengetahuan. Karena itu, justifikasi berperan penting dalam proses pemecahan masalah, khususnya pada materi pola bilangan. Namun demikian, proses justifikasi siswa masih jarang dikaitkan dengan karakteristik gaya belajar. Untuk itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan profil justifikasi siswa dengan gaya belajar converger dalam pemecahan masalah pola bilangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas dua siswa kelas VIII yang memiliki gaya belajar converger yang dipilih secara purposive sehingga diperoleh dua subjek dengan gaya belajar converger. Instrumen penelitian terdiri atas angket gaya belajar, lembar tugas tertulis, dan pedoman wawancara. Temuan utama menunjukkan bahwa gaya belajar converger memunculkan kecenderungan siswa dalam aktivitas pemecahan masalah pola bilangan memberikan justifikasi dengan tipe deductive justification without generic example. Penelitian ini memberikan gambaran bahwa kecenderungan siswa dalam menerima dan mengolah informasi mampu memberikan ciri khas pada proses berpikir. Temuan dalam penelitian dapat digunakan sebagai dasar pertimbangan dalam aktivitas pembelajaran di kelas, terutama sebagai dasar dalam mendesain tugas yang dapat memfasilitasi perkembangan justifikasi siswa.
Literaturhinweise
Akkuş, R. (2019). Change in the level of justification in problem solving over time. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(4), 1481–1494. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3050
Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Cahyono, A. N., & Maat, S. M. (2023). Student activities in solving mathematics problems with a computational thinking using Scratch. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(2), 613-621. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23308
Arifanti, D. R., Raupu, S., Thalhah, S. Z., & Ikram, M. (2024). An analysis of students’ mathematical reasoning in solving probability problems judging from learning styles: The converger. Uniciencia, 38(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.38-1.32
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
Ayala-Altamirano, C., & Molina, M. (2021). Fourth-graders’ justifications in early algebra tasks involving a functional relationship. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10036-1
Back, R.-J., Mannila, L., & Wallin, S. (2009). Student justifications in high school mathematics. In Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 291–300. Retrieved from www.inrp.fr/editions/cerme6
Barahmand, A., & Attari, N. (2025). Investigating students’ reasoning in generalization of deconstructive figural patterns. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 118(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10355-z
Bartle, R. G., & Sherbert, D. R. (2011). Introduction to real analysis (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Bhaw, N., Kriek, J., & Lemmer, M. (2023). Insights from coherence in students’ scientific reasoning skills. Heliyon, 9(7), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17349
Lesseig, K., & Lepak, J. (2022). Justification in the context of middle grades: A process of verification and sense-making. In K. N. Bieda, A. Conner, K. W. Kosko , & M. Staples (Eds.), Conceptions and Consequences of Mathematical Argumentation, Justification, and Proof, 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80008-6_9
Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). The ideal problem solver. A guide for improving thinking, learning, and creativity. A series of books in psychology.
Cai, J., & Nie, B. (2007). Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: Research and practice. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0042-3
Coşkun, S. D. (2021). Pre-service elementary teachers’ reasoning types of generalization and justification on a figural pattern task. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.74.8.3
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). London, UK: Pearson Publication.
Doz, D., Cotič, M., & Cotič, N. (2024). The problem-based approach in mathematics teaching and its impact on mathematical problem-solving performance. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 16(4), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v16i4.9519
Dreyfus, T. (2015). Constructing abstract mathematical knowledge in context. Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_7
Dunn, R. (1984). Learning style: State of the science. Theory Into Practice, 23(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848409543084
Ellis, A. B. (2007). Connections between generalizing and justifying: Students’ reasoning with linear relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 194–229. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034866
Ellis, A., Lockwood, E., & Ozaltun-Celik, A. (2022). Empirical re-conceptualization: From empirical generalizations to insight and understanding. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100928
Eriksson, H., & Sumpter, L. (2021). Algebraic and fractional thinking in collective mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(3), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10044-1
Fatmanissa, N., Jamil, A. F., Yuli, T., Siswono, E., & Lukito, A. (2025). Collaborative problem solving with and without access to technology: Emphasis on mathematical justifications. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 17(3), 178–200. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1481825.pdf
Fatmanissa, N., Siswono, T. Y. E., Lukito, A., & Ismail. (2024). Utilizing decision-making task: Students’ mathematical justification in collaborative problem solving. Avances de Investigación En Educación Matemática, (26), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem26.5341
Firdaus, A. M., Juniati, D., & Wijayanti, P. (2021). Investigating middle school students generalization of number pattern based on learning style. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(6), 2624–2632. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.5709
Foster, C. (2023). Problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: From domain‐general strategies to domain‐specific tactics. The Curriculum Journal, 34(4), 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.213
Fredriksdotter, H., Norén, N., & Bråting, K. (2022). Investigating grade-6 students’ justifications during mathematical problem solving in small group interaction. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 67, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100972
Grigorieva, E. (2016). Introduction to sequences and series. Methods of solving sequence and series problems, 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45686-7_1
Haavold, P. Ø., & Sriraman, B. (2026). Exploring the relationship between mathematical convergent and divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 62, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102226
Hamami, Y. (2023). Proofs, reliable processes, and justification in mathematics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 74(4), 1027–1045. https://doi.org/10.1086/715137
Hanna, G. (2020). Mathematical proof, argumentation, and reasoning. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_102
Hanna, G., & de Villiers, M. (2012). Aspects of proof in mathematics education. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6
Harel, G. (2024). Epistemological justification. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 56(7), 1489–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01603-w
Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). A comprehensive perspective on proof toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 805–842. Information Age Publishing.
Harel, G., & Weber, K. (2020). Deductive reasoning in mathematics education. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_43
Hartaji, I., Nursit, I., Fathani, A. H., & Milshteyn, Y. (2023). Identification of students’ mathematical creative thinking ability in number pattern problems solving. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v7i1.3698
Hiltunen, J., Hähkiöniemi, M., & Lehesvuori, S. (2026). Connections between group work and whole-class discussion: Students’ justifications in a figure pattern task. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 83, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2026.101330
Isnawan, M. G., Belbase, S., & Yanuarto, W. N. (2024). Implementation of a hybrid mathematics module to minimize students’ learning obstacles when interpreting fractions. International Journal of Didactic Mathematics in Distance Education, 1(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.33830/ijdmde.v1i2.9555
Itasari, K., Pramudya, I., & Slamet, I. (2021). Mathematical connection analysis of high school students with accommodator and diverger learning style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211122.021
Joy, S., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Are there cultural differences in learning style? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.11.002
Kidron, I., & Dreyfus, T. (2010). Justification enlightenment and combining constructions of knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9228-7
Knuth, E. J. (2002). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013838713648
Knuth, E. J., Slaughter, M., Choppin, J., & Sutherland, J. (2002). Mapping the conceptual terrain of middle school students’ competencies in justifying and proving. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1693–1700. Retrieved from https://labweb.education.wisc.edu/knuth/mathproject/papers/Knuth_PME02.pdf
Koichu, B., Parasha, R., & Tabach, M. (2021). Who-is-right tasks as a means for supporting collective looking-back practices. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 53(4), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01264-z
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1995). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in elementary school. Boston, USA: Allyn and Bacon.
Kusmaryono, I., Suyitno, H., Dwijanto, & Dwidayati, N. (2018). Analysis of abstract reasoning from grade 8 students in mathematical problem solving with SOLO taxonomy guide. Infinity Journal, 7(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i2.p69-82
Lannin, J. K. (2005). Generalization and justification: The challenge of introducing algebraic reasoning through patterning activities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(3), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0703_3
Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
Lo, J.-J., Grant, T. J., & Flowers, J. (2008). Challenges in deepening prospective teachers’ understanding of multiplication through justification. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9056-6
Mata-Pereira, J., & da Ponte, J. P. (2018). Teacher’s actions to promote students’ justifications. Acta Scientiae, 20(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.v20iss3id3910
Melhuish, K., Thanheiser, E., & Guyot, L. (2020). Elementary school teachers’ noticing of essential mathematical reasoning forms: Justification and generalization. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9408-4
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, USA: Sage Publications.
Mizrahi, M. (2020). Proof, explanation, and justification in mathematical practice. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 51(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09521-7
Molnár, G., & Pásztor, A. (2025). Reasoning skills or creativity: Which is more important in complex problem-solving? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101865
Mukherjee, F. (2025). Exploring teaching methodologies that shape cognitive and psychological approaches to abstract mathematical learning. The Social Science Review A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(5), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.70096/tssr.250305007
Nafi’an, M. I. (2020). Tipe justifikasi siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 8(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v8i1.975
Narváez, R., Brizuela, B. M., & Cañadas, M. C. (2025). Justifications and mediations in the generalization process among fourth grade students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(7), 2629–2652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10574-7
Öz, T., & Çiftci, Z. (2024). Mathematical reasoning activity: Compare, generalize and justify. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 18(2), 291–323. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1506921
Pamungkas, M. D., Juniati, D., & Masriyah. (2018). Mathematical justification ability: Students divergent and convergent process in justifying quadrilateral. Proceedings of the Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC 2018), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-18.2018.10
Parta, I. N., & Darmawan, P. (2026). Bilangan: Makna, berpikir mendalam, serta pembelajaran. Malang, Indonesia: Kramantara Jaya Sentosa.
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Purwasih, R., Turmudi, & Dahlan, J. A. (2024). How do you solve number pattern problems through mathematical semiotics analysis and computational thinking? Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp403-430
Purwasih, R., Turmudi, Dahlan, J. A., & Ishartono, N. (2024). Computational thinking on concept pattern number: A study learning style Kolb. Jurnal Elemen, 10(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i1.23056
Rahmah, K., Inganah, S., Darmayanti, R., Sugianto, R., & Ningsih, E. F. (2022). Analysis of mathematics problem solving ability of junior high school students based on APOS theory viewed from the type of Kolb learning style. INdoMATH: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 5(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v5i2.25
Rasheed, F., & Wahid, A. (2021). Learning style detection in e-learning systems using machine learning techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 174, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114774
Rofiki, I., Nusantara, T., Subanji, & Chandra, T. D. (2017). Exploring local plausible reasoning: The case of inequality tasks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012002
Rofiki, I., & Siregar, A. S. (2025). Exploring justification in solving mathematics problems in a Facebook group. Jurnal Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika (JPPM), 7(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.14421/jppm.2025.72.85-104
Rohmanawati, E., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2021). Analysis of students’ mathematical communication ability based on Kolb’s learning styles of converger and diverger type. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012050
Rokhima, W. A., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2019). Mathematical problem solving based on Kolb’s learning style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1306(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1306/1/012026
Roorda, G., de Vries, S., & Smale-Jacobse, A. E. (2024). Using lesson study to help mathematics teachers enhance students’ problem-solving skills with teaching through problem solving. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1331674
Sarumaha, Y. A., & Rizkianto, I. (2022). Promoting mathematical justification through realistic mathematics education classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK), 5(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol5iss2pp83-94
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1258
Septiani, B., & Sari, E. F. (2026). Analisis proses berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika berdasarkan gaya belajar Kolb. Al-Irsyad Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.58917/ijme.v5i1.754
Setiawan, Y. E., Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Sisworo. (2019). Generalization strategy of linear patterns from field-dependent cognitive style. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9134.77-94
Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90036-X
Sinaga, B., Sitorus, J., & Situmeang, T. (2023). The influence of students’ problem-solving understanding and results of students’ mathematics learning. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1088556
Siswono, T. Y. E., Hartono, S., & Kohar, A. W. (2020). Deductive or inductive? Prospective teachers’ preference of proof method on an intermediate proof task. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.11846.417-438
Staples, M., & Conner, A. (2022). Introduction: Conceptualizing argumentation, justification, and proof in mathematics education. In Conceptions and consequences of mathematical argumentation, justification, and proof, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80008-6_1
Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2022). Introducing students and prospective teachers to the notion of proof in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100957
Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2008). Proof in school mathematics: Insights from psychological research into students’ ability for deductive reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060701854425
Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2009). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 314–352. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.3.0314
Sudirman, Belbase, S., Rodríguez-Nieto, C. A., Muslim, A. B., & Faizah, S. (2025). Personalization of interactive teaching materials supported by augmented reality: Potentials vs obstacles in 3D geometry learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 7(1), 152–178. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2025.8
Sudirman, Rodríguez-Nieto, C. A., Hidayat, R., Isnawan, M. G., Pauzan, M., Yumiati, Martadiputra, B. A. P., & Faizah, S. (2026). Operationalizing didactical situation-based online learning to support eighth-grade students’ mathematical reasoning and understanding in geometry: Participatory design research. Journal on Mathematics Education, 17(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v17i1.pp43-68
Syaputra, D. A., Mulyono, & Hasratuddin. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis lesson study for learning community berdasarkan gaya belajar Kolb. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1225
Vízek, L., Samková, L., & Star, J. R. (2025). Investigating how lower secondary school students reason about quadrilaterals emerging in dynamic constructions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(3), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2255184
Yanto, N. D., & Rofiki, I. (2025). Investigasi kemampuan justifikasi siswa dengan gaya belajar diverger dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pola bilangan. MATHEdunesa, 14(2), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v14n2.p497-514
Yumiati, Putra, H. D., & Haji, S. (2024). Blended online learning: Students’ perception and its effect on learning outcomes abstract algebra. Infinity Journal, 14(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i1.p65-84
Yumiati, Wahyuningrum, E., Sudirman, Isnawan, M. G., Rofiki, I., Darmawan, P., Elizar, & Anwar. (2026). Cryptarithmetic as an epistemic task: Revealing elementary students’ numerical reasoning under constraint-based problem solving. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 8(1), 408–433. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2026.21
Zaky, M., Untara, K. A. A., Tang, I., Alfito, & Waenggo, O. (2024). Exploration of learning style preferences among high school students in the context of physics education: An empirical analysis using Kolb’s learning style inventory (KLSI). Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 12(3), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v12i3.19122
Zhou, Y., Ning, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, W., & Wijaya, T. T. (2024). Development and validation of mathematical higher‐order thinking scale for high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 61(8), 3160–3192. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23213
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2026 Nanda Dwi Yanto, Sisworo, Imam Rofiki
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.”
Department of Mathematics Education | Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Indonesia, 15811 | Tel +62 21 5466057 | Fax +62 21 5461055