The Plea Bargaining System as a Criminalization Model Under the Law Number 19 Year of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transaction Act and the Dignified Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v1i2.4098Trefwoorden:
Plea Bargaining System, Indonesia Criminal Justice System, Theory of Dignified Justice, Indonesian Law on Electronic Information and Transaction ActSamenvatting
From the perspective of economic analysis of law theory, the increasing number of criminal convictions would indicate that the Indonesian criminal Code and regulations have not been effective in reducing the rate of crimes. By combining a preliminary hearing, hearing of cases through a special route and the application of the principle of bargaining for sentence in the plea bargaining system, a new mechanism may be formulated in the Indonesia criminal justice proceedings. This criminal justice approach employs the dignified justice principle (teori keadilan bermartabat) approach, whereby, the trial of cases using a preliminary hearing as a special route under a sole judge that is intended for an accused who pleads guilty and bargains for a sentence. Accordingly, this research attempts to explore the use of the principles of the plea bargaining system as a criminal justice model under the Law Number 19 year of 2016 on the Electronic Information and Transaction Act (“EIT Act”). Equally important, this research employs the juridical-normative method, statute, case, and conceptual approaches in order to obtain a comprehensive result.
Referenties
Adji, Indriyanto Seno. Hukum Pidana (KUHP & KUHAP) Perkembangan Dan Permasalahan. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2014.
_______. Peradilan & KUHAP Catatan Mendatang. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2015.
Adji, Oemar Seno, and Indriyanto Seno Adji. Peradilan Bebas & Contempt of Court. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2007.
_______. Humanisme Dan Pembaharuan Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Kompas, 2009.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Perspektif Eksistensialisme Dan Abolisionisme. Bandung: Binacipta, 1996.
_______. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana, n.d.
Conboy, Maria G. S. Soetopo, and Indriyanto Seno Adji. Economic Analysis of Law Krisis Keuangan Dan Kebijakan Pemerintah. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2015.
Curzon, L. B. Dictionary of Law. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 2002.
Garner, B. A. Black’s Law Dictionary. 8th ed. Thomson West, 1999.
Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa. Bandung: P.T. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997.
Husin, Kadri, and Budi Rizki Husin. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
Latifah, Marfuatul. “Pengaturan Jalur Khusus Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (The Exceptional Strip Provisions in the Criminal Procedure Bill).” Negara Hukum 5, no. 1 (2014): 31-45. https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/209.
Loqman, Loebby. Pra Peradilan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990.
Marbun, Rocky. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Suatu Pengantar. Malang: Setara Press, 2015.
Marpaung, Leden. Unsur-Unsur Perbuatan Yang Dapat Dihukum (Delik). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1991.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.
Nelson, Febby Mutiara. Plea Bargaining & Deferred Prosecution Agreement Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Keadilan Bermartabat Perspektif Teori Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2015.
Purnomo, Bambang. Pola Dasar Teori Asas Umum Hukum Acara Pidana Dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1993.
Ramadhan, Choky Risda. “Jalur Khusus” & Plea Bargaining. Depok: Masyrakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia, 2015. http://mappifhui.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/891632jalur-khusus_plea-bargaining_crr_edited_mappi.pdf.
_______. “Media Hukum Dan Keadilan.” Teropong 1, no. Agustus (2014).
Reksodiputro, Mardjono. “Beberapa Catatan Tentang Justice Collaborator Dan Bentuk Perlindungannya.” Jakarta, n.d.
Santoso, Topo, and Choky Risda Ramadhan. Prapenuntutan Dan Perkembangan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: P.T. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2019.
Schaffmeister, Keizer, and E. P. H. Sutorius. Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1995.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 1995.
Rancangan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor ... Tahun ... tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. (n.d.). https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Rancangan-KUHAP.pdf
The Constitutional Court's decision on the judicial review of Article 27(3) of the EIT Act No. 50/PUU-VI/2008 submitted by Narliswandi Piliang (also known as Iwan Piliang).
##submission.downloads##
Gepubliceerd
Nummer
Sectie
Licentie
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
