KEY SUCCESS FACTORS OF SCHOOL LEADERSHIP IN IMPLEMENTING PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.19166/ff.v4i1.8151关键词:
Leadership, Professional Learning Communities, Learning Environment摘要
The study systematically reviews the literature to understand the key success factors for school leadership in fostering PLCs and the most effective leadership style for this endeavor. Through a detailed analysis, it identifies key success factors such as visionary leadership, shared values, effective communication, collaborative decision-making, and strategic problem-solving. The study also emphasized the transformative, facilitative, distributed, democratic, and situational leadership styles conducive to PLC success.. These elements are essential for creating a collaborative learning environment that promotes professional growth, innovation, and improved student outcomes. The study acknowledges limitations including the scope of literature and challenges in directly correlating leadership styles with PLC success. Future research directions include exploring the long-term impact of leadership on PLCs, cross-contextual comparisons, empirical validations of theoretical frameworks, and the role of digital technologies in PLC enhancement.
参考
Agarwal, S. (2019). Leadership style and performance of employees. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
Chua, W. C., Thien, L. M., Lim, S. Y., Tan, C. S., & Guan, T. E. (2020). Unveiling the practices and challenges of professional learning community in a Malaysian Chinese Secondary School. Sage Open, 10(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020925516
Çoban, Ö., & Atasoy, R. (2020). Relationship between distributed leadership, teacher collaboration and organizational innovativeness. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 903-911. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20679
El Bakkali, A. (2020). The power of distributed leadership styles in education practices: The new challenges and perspectives of the Moroccan School. International Journal of Advance Study and Research Work, 3(2), 9-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3692413
Francisco, C. D. C., & Nuqui, A. V. (2020). Emergence of a situational leadership during Covid-19 pandemic called new normal leadership. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR), 4(10), 15-19. www.ijeais.org/ijamr
Gehani, K. H., Hyde, A. M., & Kushwaha, V. S. (2019). A study of management by exception: active, passive & laissez-faire leadership style of leaders in B School. UNNAYAN: International Bulletin of Management and Economics, 11, 151-161.
Ghratapeh, S., Hassani, M., Ghalavandi, H., & Ghasemzadeh Alishahi, A. (2022). Analyzing the challenges and obstacles to the leadership of professional learning communities in schools and identifying strategies for addressing the obstacles: A mixed approach. Journal of School Administration, 10(2), 57-74.
Hamzah, M. I. M., & Jamil, M. F. (2019). The relationship of distributed leadership and professional learning community. Creative Education, 10, 2730-2741. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012199
Jafar, M. F., Yaakob, M. F. M., Awang, H. Z., Zain, F. M., & Kasim, M. (2022). Disentangling the toing and froing of professional learning community implementation by reconnecting educational policy with school culture. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 307-328. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15218a
Jony, M. T. I., Alam, Md. J., Amin, M. R. (2019). The impact of autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire leadership styles on the success of the organization: A study on the different popular restaurants of Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Canadian Journal of Business and Information Studies, 1(6), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.34104/cjbis.019.028038
Khanthap, J. (2022). Innovative leadership factors and leader characteristics affect professional learning community of primary schools in Bangkok and its vicinity. World Journal of Education, 12(4), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v12n4p50
Khun-Inkeeree, H., Yusof, M. R., Maruf, I. R., Mat, T. R. T., & Sofian, F. N. R. M. (2022). Enhancing school effectiveness by implementing identified and intrinsic motivation among primary school teachers. Frontiers in Education, 7, 852-378. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.852378
Luqman, R., Fatima, S., Ahmed, S., Khalid, I., Bhatti, A. (2019). The Impact of autocratic leadership style on counterproductive work behavior: The mediating role of employee commitment and moderating role of emotional exhaustion. Pollster Journal of Academic Research, 6(1), 22-47.
Marlina, E., Aslamiah., & Ngadimun. (2023). The effect of transformational leadership, motivation, work ethic with teacher performance at public elementary school in Kertak Hanyar District, Banjar Regency. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(3), 1971-1975. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i3-76
Nordick, S., Putney, L. G., Jones, S. H., (2019). The principal’s role in developing collective teacher efficacy: a cross-case study of facilitative leadership. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 13, 248-260.
Olsson, D. (2019). Improving teaching and learning together: A literature review of professional learning communities. Karlstad University Studies, 2019:23.
Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2019). The effects of networked professional learning communities. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 441-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117753574
Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teacher’s workplace: The Social Organization of Schools. New York, NY: Longman.
Salleh, H., Goh, J. W. P., Chua, C. S. K., & Wang, L.-Y. (2017). A research agenda for professional learning communities: Moving Forward. Professional Development in Education, 43(1), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1055861
Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.
Sleegers, P. J. C., Thoonen, E. E. J., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (2014). Changing classroom practices: The role of school-wide capacity for sustainable improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 617-652. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2013-0126
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Tabak, H., & Sahin, F. (2020). Investigating the relationship between school effectiveness, professional learning communities, school culture, and teacher characteristics. Education Reform Journal, 5(2), 45-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.22596/erj2020.05.02.45.59
Turner, J. C., Christensen, A., Kackar-Cam, H. Z., Fulmer, S. M., & Trucano, M. (2018). The development of professional learning communities and their teacher leaders: An activity systems analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27, 49-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381962
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A Review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Watson, C. (2014). Effective professional learning communities? the possibilities for teachers as agents of change in Schools. British Educational Research Journal. 40, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3025
Weissenrieder, J., Roesken-Winter, B., Schueler, S., Binner, E., & Blömeke, S. (2015). Scaling CPD through professional learning communities: Development of teachers’ self-efficacy in relation to collaboration. Spinger Link, 47, 27-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0673-8
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
##submission.downloads##
已出版
期
栏目
##submission.license##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis | Universitas Pelita Harapan | Kampus Universitas Pelita Harapan | Gedung F Lt. 12 | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang - 15811 | Telp 021-5460901 | Fax 54210992