Sejarah Pemikiran Faith and Reason dalam Tradisi Reformed: dari Masa Abad Pertengahan hingga Masa Orthodoxy [A History of Thought on Faith and Reason in the Reformed Tradition: From the Middle Ages to the Period of Orthodoxy]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/dil.v4i3.6337Keywords:
Faith, reason, reformed tradition, medieval period, reformation period, orthodoxy periodAbstract
Research on historical thought of the Reformed tradition was started by Alexander Schweizer who proposed a method for reading history, namely centraldogmen. During its development, this method was received by a group of historians known as the Barthian tradition. In this tradition, the development of thought on the reformed tradition is considered to have been discontinued after John Calvin. These views surround the post-Calvinian theologians of the reformation tradition. Recent research tries to propose another method for reading history, namely by considering its continuity and discontinuity. With this new method, I intend to look at the history of the reformed tradition in the case of the relationship between faith and reason. This paper will discuss thoughts on the relationship between faith and reason from 3 different periods, that is the medieval period, the reformation period, and the orthodoxy period. From my analysis, I conclude that in the case of the relationship between faith and reason, there is a continuity of thought from the medieval period to the orthodoxy period. With this conclusion, the position of the Barthian tradition on reformed thinking needs to be re-evaluated.
BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRACT: Penelitian mengenai pemikiran sejarah tradisi reformasi dimulai oleh Alexander Schweizer yang mengajukan sebuah metode untuk membaca sejarah, yaitu centraldogmen. Dalam perkembangannya, metode ini diterima oleh sekelompok sejarawan yang dikenal dengan tradisi Barthian. Dalam tradisi ini, perkembangan pemikiran mengenai tradisi reformasi dianggap telah terhenti setelah John Calvin. Pandangan ini melingkupi para teolog tradisi reformasi pasca Calvin. Penelitian terbaru mencoba mengajukan metode lain dalam membaca sejarah, yaitu dengan mempertimbangkan kontinuitas dan diskontinuitasnya. Dengan metode baru ini, saya bermaksud untuk melihat sejarah tradisi Reformasi dalam hal hubungan antara iman dan akal budi. Tulisan ini akan membahas pemikiran-pemikiran mengenai relasi iman dan akal budi dari tiga periode yang berbeda, yaitu periode abad pertengahan, periode reformasi, dan periode ortodoksi. Dari hasil analisis saya, saya menyimpulkan bahwa dalam hal hubungan antara iman dan akal budi, terdapat kesinambungan pemikiran dari periode abad pertengahan hingga periode ortodoksi. Dengan kesimpulan ini, posisi tradisi Barthian dalam pemikiran reformasi perlu dievaluasi kembali.
References
Armstrong, Brian G. Calvinism and the Amyraut Heresy: Protestant Scholasticism and Humanism in Seventeenth-Century France. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2004.
Beck, Andreas J. Gisbertus Voetius (1589-1676): Sein Theologieverständnis Und Seine Gotteslehre. Forschungen Für Kirchen- Und Dogmengeschichte 92. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2007. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666551000
Bizer, Ernst. “Frühorthodoxie Und Rationalismus.” In Theologische Studien, Vol. 71. Zurich, Switzerland: EVZ-Verlag, 1963.
Bonaventure. Works on St. Bonaventure: Breviloquium. Edited by Robert J. Karris. Translated by Dominic V. Monti. Vol. IX. Bonaventure Text in Translation Series. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, 2005.
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Edited by John Thomas McNeill. Vol. 1. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1960.
Davies, Bryan and G. R. Evans, eds. Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Cullen, Christopher M. Bonaventure: Great Medieval Thinkers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Cummings, Nicholas Andrew. Francis Turretin (1623-87) and the Reformed Tradition. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004348011.
Cummings, Nicholas Andrew. “The Life of Francis Turretin (1623-87) and His Impact on the Protestant Reformed Tradition.” PhD diss, King’s College London, 2019. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/studentTheses/the-life-of-francis-turretin-1623-87-and-his-impact-on-the-protes.
Gilson, Etienne. History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages. New York, NY: Random House, 1955.
Gilson, Etienne. Reason and Revelation in The Middle Ages. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1939.
Goudriaan, Aza. Reformed Orthodoxy and Philosophy, 1625 -1750: Gisbertus Voetius, Petrus van Mastricht, and Anthonius Driessen. Vol. 26. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047411543.
Hall, Basil. “Calvin Against the Calvinists.” In John Calvin: A Collection of Distinguished Essays, 19-37. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1966.
Junius, Franciscus. A Treatise on True Theology: With the Life of Franciscus Junius. Translated by David C Noe. Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books, 2014.
Kusukawa, Sachiko. The Transformation on Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philipp Melanchthon. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598524.
Lohse, Bernhard. Theologi Martin Luther: Perkembangan Historis dan Theologi Sistematikanya. Translated by Roy A. Harrisvile. Surabaya, Indonesia: Momentum, 2016.
Luther, Martin. Martin Luther’s Basic Theological Writtings. Edited by Timothy F. Lull and William R. Russell. 3rd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2012.
Marshall, Bruce D. “Faith and Reason Reconsidered: Aquinas and Luther on Deciding What Is True.” The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review 63, no. 1 (1999): 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1999.0041.
McGrath, Alister E. Reformation Thought. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
Melanchthon, Philipp. Melanchthon on Christian Doctrine: Loci Communes 1555. Edited and Translated by Clyde L. Manschrek. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1965.
Mobley, Susan. “Making University Lutheran: Philipp Melachthon and The Reform of The University of Tubingen in the 1530.” Logia, n.d., 41-45.
Muller, Richard A. Christ and The Decree: Christology and Predestination in Reformed Theology from Calvin to Perkins. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008.
Muller, Richard A. Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics: The Rise and Development of Reformed Orthodoxy, ca. 1520 to ca. 1725. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Publishing Group, 2003.
Muller, Richard A. “Reassessing The Relation of Reformation And Orthodoxy: A Methodological Rejoinder” n.d., 11.
Muller, Richard A. The Unaccommodated Calvin: Studies in the Foundation of a Theological Tradition. Oxford Studies in Historical Theology. New York, NY: Oxford University, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195116816.001.0001.
Nieuwenhove, Rik Van. An Introduction to Medieval Theology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Oberman, Heiko A. The Dawn of Reformation. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing, 1992.
Rehnman, Sebastian. Divine Discourse: The Theological Methodology of John Owen. Texts and Studies in Reformation and Post-Reformation Thought. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2002.
Schweizer, Alexander. Die Protestantischen Centraldogmen in Ihrer Entwicklung Innerhalb Der Reformirten Kirche. 2 vols. Zurich, Switzerland: Kessinger Publishing, 1854.
Selderhuis, Herman. J., ed. A Companion to Reformed Orthodoxy. Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition, Vol. 40. Boston, MA: Brill, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004248915.
Steinmetz, David Curtis. Calvin in Context. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Turretin, Francis. Institute of Elenctic Theology. Edited by James T. Dennison. Translated by George Musgrave Giger. Philipsburg, NJ: P&R Publisher, 1997.
Van Asselt, Willem J. Introduction to Reformed Scholasticism. Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books, 2011.
Wyk, Ignatius W.C. van. “Philipp Melanchthon: A Short Introduction.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 73, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i1.4672.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included