THE EFFECT OF TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) MODIFIED SCHEMA BASED INSTRUCTION (SBI) ON MATHEMATICS PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY OF GRADE V STUDENTS [PENGARUH TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) MODIFIKASI SCHEMA BASED INSTRUCTION (SBI) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS V]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/pji.v22i1.10195Schlagworte:
Schema-Based Instruction, Teams Games Tournament, Mathematics Problem-Solving AbilityAbstract
Mathematical problem-solving skills are important to develop in learning mathematics in elementary schools. However, the fact that occurs is that students' ability in this competency is still lacking. This study aims to determine whether there is a difference in the mathematical problem-solving ability of students who learn using the Teams Games Tournament method modified by Schema-Based Instruction with students who learn using the expository method. This study used experimental research methods on fifth grade students of SDN Beumopu and was conducted from January to June 2025. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling. The samples in the experimental class and control class amounted to 32 students each. Data collection utilized mathematical problem-solving ability test instruments in the form of essay questions. Indicators of mathematical problem-solving ability include understanding the problem, planning problem-solving strategies, and implementing problem-solving plans. The results showed that the problem-solving ability of fifth-grade students who learned with the SBI modified TGT method was higher than that of students who learned with the expository method.
Abstrak Bahasa Indonesia
Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika penting untuk dikembangkan pada pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. Namun, fakta yang terjadi adalah kemampuan siswa pada kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa masih kurang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui adakah perbedaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa yang belajar menggunakan metode Teams Games Tournament modifikasi Schema Based Instruction dengan siswa yang belajar menggunakan metode ekspositori. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian eksperimen pada siswa kelas V SDN Beumopu dan dilaksanakan dari bulan Januari sampai bulan Juni 2025. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan cluster random sampling. Sampel pada kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol masing-masing berjumlah 32 siswa. Pengumpulan data menggunakan instrumen tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika berupa soal esai. Indikator kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika adalah memahami masalah, merencanakan strategi penyelesaian masalah dan melaksanakan rencana penyelesaian masalah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa kelas V yang belajar dengan metode TGT modifikasi SBI lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan siswa yang belajar dengan metode ekspositori.
Literaturhinweise
Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Lo, Y. Y., Saunders, A. F., Root, J. R., Ley Davis, L., & Brosh, C. R. (2018). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability to solve word problems. Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917721236
Cresswell, Jhon W., (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Person Education, Inc.
Desmarais, K., Osana, H. P., & Lafay, A. (2019). Schema-based instruction: Supporting children with learning difficulties and intellectual disabilities in mathematical learning and cognition in early childhood (pp. 203–221). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12895-1_12
Diezmann C. M., English L. D. (2001). Promoting the use of diagrams as tools for thinking. In Cuoco A. A., Curcio F. R. (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics: 2001 yearbook (pp. 77–89). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Egbo, J. J. (2014). Effect of concept mapping method of instruction and expository method on students’ academic achievement in chemistry. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n26p80
Fede, J. L., Pierce, M. E., Matthews, W. J., & Wells, C. S. (2013). The effects of a computer-assisted, schema-based instruction intervention on word problem-solving skills of low-performing fifth grade students. In Journal of Special Education Technology JSET (Vol. 28). https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341302800102
Fitriani, Herman, T., & Fatimah, S. (2023). Considering the mathematical resilience in analyzing students’ problem-solving ability through learning model experimentation. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16113a
Fraenkel R.J. & Wallen E.N. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fuchs, L. S., Seethaler, P. M., Sterba, S. K., Craddock, C., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Geary, D. C., & Changas, P. (2021). Closing the word-problem achievement gap in first grade: Schema-based word-problem intervention with embedded language comprehension instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000467
Hidayati, N. A., Fahmi, S., & Farida, K. (2019). The comparative of mathematics learning using guided discovery method and expository method to mathematics learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032103
Hord, C., & Xin, Y. P. (2013). Intervention research for helping elementary school students with math learning difficulties understand and solve word problems: 19962010. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.18666/ldmj-2013-v19-i1-4789
Hughes, S., & Cuevas, J. (2020). The effects of schema-based instruction on solving mathematics word problems. Georgia Educational Researcher, 17(2), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2020.170202
Jitendra, A. K., Star, J. R., Rodriguez, M., Lindell, M., & Someki, F. (2011). Improving students’ proportional thinking using schema-based instruction. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 731–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.002
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1999). Cooperatif learning in the classroom. USA: Association for Supervision and Curiculum.
Jung, E., Lim, R., & Kim, D. (2022). A schema-based instructional design model for self-paced learning environments. Education Sciences, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040271
Kaitera, S., & Harmoinen, S. (2022). Developing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary school by using visual representations on heuristics. LUMAT, 10(2), 111–146. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1696
Kaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., van Luit, J. E. H., & Verhoeven, L. (2020). Impact of children’s math self-concept, math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and teacher competencies on math development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103096
Kilpatrick, Jeremy., Swafford, Jane., Findell, Bradford., & National Research Council (U.S.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee. (2001). Adding it up : helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429061523
Kopparla, M., Bicer, A., Vela, K., Lee, Y., Bevan, D., Kwon, H., Caldwell, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2019a). The effects of problem-posing intervention types on elementary students’ problem-solving. Educational Studies, 45(6), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509785
Kopparla, M., Bicer, A., Vela, K., Lee, Y., Bevan, D., Kwon, H., Caldwell, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2019b). The effects of problem-posing intervention types on elementary students’ problem-solving.
Educational Studies, 45(6), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509785
Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (n.d.). Problem solving in mathematics education ICME-13 topical surveys. http://www.springer.com/series/14352
Ling, A. N. B., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). Challenges of teachers when teaching sentence-based mathematics problem-solving skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074202
Lumbantoruan, J. H. (2022). Further insight into Student Learning Outcomes of Derivative Materials: Numbered Head Together and Expository Learning Model ARTICLE HISTORY Learning outcomes Numbered head together Expository learning model Derivative materials Non-equivalent CGD Good thinking concepts. 4(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v4i2.9918
Marshall, S. P., Barthuli, K. E., Brewer, M. A., & Rose, F. E. (1989). Story Problem Solver: A schema-based system of instruction.
Mayasari, D., Natsir, I., & Taufik, A. R. (2021). Analysis of students’ mathematical problem-solving ability in term of multiple intelligence. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 8(2), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v8i2.20369
Mayer, R. E., & Hegarty, M. (2012). The process of understanding mathematical problems. In The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 29-53). Routledge.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. United States of America : The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Noviyana, H., Rahmawati, F., Rara Kirana, A., Tanod, J., Pgri, S., & Lampung, B. (n.d.). (2025). Enhancing elementary students’ mathematical problem-solving skills through AI-Assisted problem-based learning. Journal of Integrated Elementary Education 5(2), 2828–223. https://doi.org/10.21580/jieed.v5i2.27576
Öztürk, M., Akkan, Y., & Kaplan, A. (2019). Reading comprehension, mathematics self-efficacy perception, and mathematics attitude as correlates of students’ non-routine Mathematics problem-solving skills in Turkey. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1042–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1648893
Pebrianti, A., Juandi, D., & Nurlaelah, E. (2022). Reversible thinking ability in solving mathematics problems. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1905
Peltier, C., Sinclair, T. E., Pulos, J. M., & Suk, A. (2019). Effects of schema-based instruction on immediate, generalized, and combined structured word problems. Journal of Special Education, 54(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919883397
Peltier, C., & Vannest, K. J. (2017). A meta-analysis of schema instruction on the problem-solving performance of elementary school students. Review of Educational Research, 87(5), 899–920. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317720163
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A New Aspect Mathematical Method. United States: Princeton University Press.
Powell, S. R. (2011). Solving word problems using schemas: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(2), 94-108.
Pramuditya, S. A., Noto, M. S., & Azzumar, F. (2022). Characteristics of students’ mathematical problem solving abilities in open-ended-based virtual reality game learning. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p255-272
Pratama, M. A., Yurniwati, Y., & Chaeruman, U. A. (2022). An analysis of elementary school students’ understanding of mathematical concept. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3563–3568. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2672
Priansa, D.J. (2017). Manajemen Peserta Didik dan Model Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Reys, R.E., Lindquist, M., Lambdin, D.V, &Smith, N.L. (2009). Helping children learn mathematics (9th ed.). US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Roemintoyo, R., Miyono, N., & Budiarto, M. K. (2022). Implementation of blended learning model based on expository learning and small group discussion In University. International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation, 3(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v3i3.4299
Root, J. R., Browder, D. M., Saunders, A. F., & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). Schema-based instruction with concrete and virtual manipulatives to teach problem solving to students with autism. Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516643592
Sanjaya,Wina. (2018). Strategi pembelajaran beriorentasi standar proses. Jakarta: Kencana.
Santagata, R., Yeh, C., & Mercado, J. (2018). Preparing elementary school teachers to learn from teaching: A comparison of two approaches to mathematics methods instruction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(3), 474–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1441030
Septian, A., Widodo, S. A., Afifah, I. N., Nisa, D. Z., Putri, N. P. K., Tyas, M. D., Nisa, R. H., & Andriani, A. (2022). Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Indonesia. Journal of Instructional Mathematics, 3(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v3i1.1223
Skinner, M. G., & Cuevas, J. A. (2023). The Effects of Schema-Based Instruction on Word-Problems in a Third-Grade Mathematics Classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 855–880. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16148a
Slavin, R.E. 2016. Cooperative learning: Teori, riset, dan praktik (Terjemahan). Bandung: Nusa Media.
Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, E. L. (2015). Partial testing can potentiate learning of tested and untested material from multimedia lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 991–1005. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000031
Son, J. W., & Lee, M. Y. (2021a). Exploring the Relationship Between Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions of Problem Solving and Their Problem-Solving Performances. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10045-w
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Sulistyani, D., Subekti, E. E., & Wardana, M. Y. S. (2021). Students’ Learning Difficulties Review from Mathematics Problem-Solving Ability in Third-Grade Elementary School. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 4(2), 345. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i2.30310
Sumantri. (2016). Strategi pembelajaran: teori dan praktik di tingkat pendidikan dasar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Suntari, Y., & Pasini Mairing, J. (2023a). Effectiveness schema based instruction of mathematical problem solving: Literature Review.
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: a survey. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
Voica, C., Singer, F. M., & Stan, E. (2020). How are motivation and self-efficacy interacting in problem-solving and problem-posing? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 487–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10005-0
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2026 Monica Abolla, Yurniwati
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
Faculty of Education | Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Indonesia, 15811 | Tel +62 21 5460901 | Fax +62 21 5460910 | 