EVALUASI KEGIATAN INSTRUKSIONAL PENGUCAPAN BAHASA INDONESIA OLEH MAHASISWA MENGGUNAKAN SURVEI DARING [STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION IN AN INDONESIAN LANGUAGE PRONUNCIATION COURSE USING AN ONLINE SURVEY]

Hery Yanto The, Latifah Latifah

Abstract


Student evaluation of instruction is important feedback for instructors to receive in order to refine and improve the learning quality of a course. A free online survey, such as Survey Monkey, can be used to collect the feedback. There is display feature in Survey Monkey that allow users to view the summary of the data in tables and charts. The free account does not support downloading data from the server, but users can compile it manually. This study focuses on using an online survey in the Indonesian Language Program of Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages in China. Students who were enrolled in the Indonesian Pronunciation Course evaluated the instruction in the course. The results showed that data collected through a well-structured online survey questionnaire, aligned with the aim of evaluation, can provide the instructor with sufficient information about the strengths and weaknesses of the instruction.

BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRAK: Evaluasi kegiatan instruksional oleh mahasiswa dapat digunakan sebagai bahan masukan untuk memperbaiki dan meningkatkan kualitas belajar mengajar mata kuliah. Evaluasi oleh mahasiswa dapat diperoleh melalui pengumpulan data dengan angket pada survei daring bebas bayar seperti Survey Monkey. Survei ini dapat menampilkan tabel dan grafik ringkasan data yang dengan mudah dapat digunakan oleh dosen untuk melakukan interpretasi. Data kualitatif dari hasil pertanyaan terbuka dapat dilihat pada laman Survey Monkey, namun hasil rinci yang akan diinterpretasi harus diunduh secara manual karena peneliti menggunakan akun bebas bayar. Penelitian survei daring ini memaparkan analisis dan interpretasi evaluasi mahasiswa terhadap kegiatan instruksional mata kuliah Pengucapan Bahasa Indonesia pada Jurusan Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Bahasa Asing Zhejiang Yuexiu di Tiongkok. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, data survei yang dikumpulkan dengan angket daring yang disusun secara terstruktur dan sesuai dengan tujuan evaluasi dapat memberikan informasi mengenai kelebihan dan kekurangan pelaksanaan kegiatan instruksional selama perkuliahan.


Keywords


language learning; evaluation of instruction; online survey; BIPA; foreign-language instruction; evaluasi instruksional, survei daring



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/pji.v15i1.1046

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alessi, E. J., & Martin, J. I. (2010). Conducting an internet-based survey: Benefits, pitfalls, and lessons learned. Social Work Research, 34(2), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/34.2.122

Australian Medical Association. (2016). Rural health issues survey report: Rural doctors have their say. AMA Rural Health Issues Survey, 1, 1-18. Retrieved from https://ama.com.au/system/tdf/documents/Rural%20Health%20Issues%20Survey%20Report%20Final.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=44431

Babbie, E. R. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.

Blair, E., & Noel, K. V. (2014). Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: Is the student voice being heard? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 879-894. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.875984

Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Kelsey, D. M. (2016). Instructor clarity and student motivation: Academic performance as a product of students’ ability and motivation to process instructional material. Communication Education, 65(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1079329

Chen, Y., & Hoshower, L. B. (2003). Student evaluation of teaching perception and motivation. Evaluation, 28(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301683

De Neve, H. M. F. (1991). University teachers’ thinking about lecturing: Student evaluation of lecturing as an improvement perspective for the lecturer. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 22(1), 63-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02351200

Fazelian, P. (2011). Future of instructional technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30(1), 2052-2056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.398

Garrity, J. (2010). Drive customer loyalty with net promoter score. ABA Bank Marketing, 42(9), 30-33.

Gordon, J. S., & McNew, R. (2008). Developing the online survey. Nursing Clinics of North America, 43(4), 605-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2008.06.011

Hapsari, Y. R., Sutama, I. M., & Wendra, I. W. (2017). Pelaksanaan pembelajaran berbicara BIPA siswa kelas IX di Gandhi Memorial Intercontinental School Bali. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 6(1). https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPBS/article/viewFile/9265/5968

Higher Education Policy Institute. (2016). The student academic experience survey. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/institutions/surveys/SAES

Hines, C. V., Cruickshank, D. R., & Kennedy, J. J. (1985). Teacher clarity and its relationship to student achievement and satisfaction. American Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162989

Idris, N. S. (2009). Metode pengajaran BIPA. Teaching Methodology of Indonesian Language for Foreign Learners SEAMEO QITEP in Language. Retrieved from http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPBS/JUR._PEND._BHS._DAN_SASTRA_INDONESIA/196707151991032-NUNY_SULISTIANY_IDRIS/Metode_Pengajaran_BIPA.pdf

International Religious Freedom. (2012, April). International religious freedom report. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2012religiousfreedom/index.htm#wrapper

Kaczmirek, L. (2008). Internet survey software tools. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 236-254). Singapore: Sage Publications Ltd.

Keiser, B. E. (2016). Survey research: Polling and beyond. Online Searcher, 40(2), 22-27. Retreived from http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/onlinesearcher/20160304/index.php#/24

Kristensen, K., & Eskildsen, J. (2014). Is the NPS a trustworthy performance measure? The TQM Journal, 26(2), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-03-2011-0021

Lunenburg, F. C., & Irby, B. J. (2011). Instructional strategies to facilitate learning. International Journal of Educational Leadership Prepa- Ration, 1(4), 1-12. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ974330.pdf

Marra, R., & Bogue, B. (2006). A critical assessment of online survey tools. Proceedings of the 2006 WEPAN Conference, 1, 1-11. Retrieved from https://www.engr.psu.edu/awe/misc/ResearchPagePDFs/126-Marra-CriticalSurvey.pdf

Ofsted. (2013). Maintaining curiosity: A survey into science education in schools. Ofsted Schools Survey Reports. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/379164/Maintaining_20curiosity_20a_20survey_20into_20science_20education_20in_20schools.pdf

Pew Research Center. (2017). Questionnaire design. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/methodology/u-s-survey-research/questionnaire-design/

Rocks, B. (2016). Interval estimation for the “Net Promoter Score.” American Statistician, 70(4), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1158124

Satyanarayana, L. V. (2015). A Survey on challenges and advantages in big data. IJCST, 6(2), 115-119. Retreived from http://www.ijcst.com/vol62/1/24-LENKA-VENKATA-SATYANARAYANA.pdf

Schindler, B. E. (2016). The best online survey tools of 2016. PCMAG. Retrieved from http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2494737,00.asp

Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M. (2000). The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: Love me, love my lectures? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611436

Sok-Foon, Y., Sze-Yin, J. H., & Yin-Fah, B. C. (2012). Student evaluation of lecturer performance among private university students. Canadian Social Science, 8(4), 238-243. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720120804.3022

Uttl, B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54(1), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007

Waclawski, E. (2012). How I use it: Survey Monkey. Occupational Medicine, 62(6), 477. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs075

Wilcox, B. L. (1998). Changing attitudes on assessment. Reading Teacher, 52(3), 294-297.

Wilson-Strydom, M., & Fongwa, S. N. (2012). A profile of higher education in Southern Africa – Volume 1: A regional perspective. Johannesburg, South Africa: SARUA. Retrieved from https://www.sarua.org/files/SARUA%20Profiles%20of%20HE%20Vol%201.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2019 Hery Yanto The, Latifah Latifah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

favicon Faculty of Education | Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Indonesia, 15811 | Tel +62 21 5466057 | Fax +62 21 5461055