Healthy Food Marketing Across Consumer and Retail Levels: A Descriptive Comparative Analysis of Perception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/imj.v6i1.10521Keywords:
Healthy Food Marketing, Consumer Perception, Retail Decision Making, Purchase Intention, Choice Architecture, Front-of-Pack Labels, Health Communication, Taste-Health Trade-offAbstract
Healthy food marketing influences consumers and retailers across three stages of the decision-making process. The purpose of the study is to describe and compare how marketing cues shape consumer perception, how specific strategies influence purchase decisions, and how store level conditions affect the adoption of health-oriented marketing practices. Three peers reviewed articles form the basis of the analysis. The first article, by Li et al. (2024), explains about packaging cues related to taste and health shape consumers' beliefs about product healthfulness and their purchase intentions. Their findings show that taste-focused cues increase purchase intention but may reduce perceived healthiness, while health-focused cues enhance health perceptions across product types. The second article, by Vidal and Castellano (2022), identifies the strategies that influence purchase intention. Their work highlights the effect of front of pack labels, nutritional information, natural quality cues, and emotional appeals on consumer choice. The third article, by Houghtaling et al. (2019), reviews the factors that influence food store owners' and managers' willingness to use healthy choice architecture and marketing mix strategies. Their findings show that adoption depends on customer demand, profit expectations, staff capacity, and operational constraints. Consumers form health beliefs from marketing cues, these beliefs influence responses to targeted strategies, and store operators adjust their marketing mix in response to customer behavior and financial expectations. This study contributes an integrated understanding of how perception, strategy, and retail decision making interact, offering insights for marketers, public health planners, and store managers who aim to strengthen healthy food environments.
References
Cameron, A. J., Brown, A., Orellana, L., Marshall, J., Charlton, E., Ngan, W. W. N., Ananthapavan, J., Isaacs, J., Blake, M., & Sacks, G. (2022). Change in the healthiness of foods sold in an Australian Supermarket chain following implementation of a shelf tag intervention based on the health star rating system. Nutrients, 14(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122394
Chen, P. -J., & Antonelli, M. (2020). Conceptual models of food choice: Influential factors related to foods, individual differences, and society. Food, 9(12), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121898
Durach, C. F., Kembro, J. H., & Wieland, A. (2021). How to advance theory through literature reviews in logistics and supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 51(10), 1090–1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-11-2020-0381
Houghtaling, B., Serrano, E. L., Kraak, V. I., Harden, S. M., Davis, G. C., & Misyak, S. A. (2019). A systematic review of factors that influence food store owner and manager decision making and ability or willingness to use choice architecture and marketing mix strategies to encourage healthy consumer purchases in the United States, 2005–2017. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0767-8
Kos, D., Eijssen, I., Bekkering, G. E., De Coninck, L., O’Meara, C., Koen, M., & Hynes, S. M. (2023). Occupational therapy in multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1(5), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015371
Li, X., Wang, S., Ruan, Y., Pan, Y., & Huang, Y. (2024). Taste or health: The impact of packaging cues on consumer decision-making in healthy foods. Appetite, 203(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107636
Logullo, P., van Zuuren, E. J., Winchester, C. C., Tovey, D., Gattrell, W. T., Price, A., Harrison, N., Goldman, K., Chisholm, A., Walters, K., & Blazey, P. (2024). Accurate consensus reporting document (ACCORD) explanation and elaboration: Guidance and examples to support reporting consensus methods. PLoS Medicine, 21(5), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004390
Malesu, V. K. (2025, October 17). Front-of-package health claims don’t reflect true nutrition. News-Medical Life Sciences. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20251017/Front-of-package-health-claims-done28099t-reflect-true-nutrition.aspx
Modzelewska, D., Solé-Navais, P., Brantsæter, A. L., Flatley, C., Elvin, A., Meltzer, H. M., Sengpiel, V., Barman, M., & Jacobsson, B. (2023). Maternal dietary selenium intake during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in the Norwegian mother, father, and child cohort study. Nutrients, 13(4), 12–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041239
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information and Management, 52(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
Roberto, C. A., Ng, S. W., Ganderats-Fuentes, M., Hammond, D., Barquera, S., Jauregui, A., & Taillie, L. S. (2021). The influence of front-of-package nutrition labeling on consumer behavior and product reformulation. Annual Review of Nutrition, 41, 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-111120-094932
Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3
Snyder, H. (2024). Designing the literature review for a strong contribution.
Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197704
Steiner, K., Kunz, S., & Florack, A. (2025). How can health look tasty? Effects of packaging color saturation on beverage health and taste expectations depend on color match. British Food Journal, 127(13), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2024-0651
Tavares, M. H., Sampaio, G. R., Camargo, A. C., & Torres, E. A. F. S. (2024). The role of health claims on consumer behavior and food choice: A narrative review. Foods, 15(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040773
Vidal, M. M., & Castellano, C. (2022). Identification of marketing strategies influencing consumers’ perception of healthy food products and triggering purchasing decisions. Businesses, 2(4), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses2040026
Winkler, M. R., Lenk, K., Harnack, L., & Caspi, C. E. (2022). Healthy retail interventions: Barriers and facilitators for store owners. Public Health Nutrition, 25(5), 1312–1323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021003077
World Health Organization. (2023, July 3). Policies to protect children from the harmful impact of food marketing: WHO guideline. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240075412
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 James Tandy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.