The Market Orientation and Performance Relationship: An Empirical Study in Private Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/derema.v12i1.331Schlagworte:
market orientation, private universities, performance, Kopertis X, IndonesiaAbstract
This study examines the empirical link between three dimensions of market orientation, namely, student orientation, competitor orientation and inter-functional coordination, and private university performance in Kopertis X. The study was based on an empirical investigation of private universities located in Indonesia’s provinces of West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Riau Islands. The primary data for the study were collected from a self-administered mail survey of 237 questionnaires from the private university resulting in a sample of 114 usable responses being returned. From the application of the multiple regression analysis it was concluded that all three dimensions of market orientation had a significant impact on private university performance. Student orientation as a predictor variable is the strongest predictor of private university performance then followed by competitor orientation, and inter-functional coordination.
Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Penelitian ini menguji hubungan empiris antara tiga dimensi orientasi pasar, yaitu, orientasi mahasiswa, orientasi pesaing dan koordinasi antar-fungsional dan kinerja perguruan tinggi swasta di Kopertis X. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada penyelidikan empiris pada universitas swasta yang berada di provinsi Sumatera Barat, Riau, Jambi, dan Kepulaian Riau. Data primer dikumpulkan dari survei dimana dari 237 kuesioner yang disebarkan pada universitas swasta, diperoleh 114 kuesioner yang dikembalikan dan dapat digunakan sebagai sampel. Berdasarkan hasil analisis regresi berganda dapat disimpulkan bahwa ketiga dimensi orientasi pasar memiliki dampak yang signifikan terhadap kinerja perguruan tinggi swasta. Orientasi mahasiswa sebagai variabel prediktor terkuat terhadap kinerja perguruan tinggi swasta kemudian diikuti oleh orientasi pesaing, dan koordinasi antar-fungsional.
Literaturhinweise
Algarni, A. M. M., & Thalib, N. A. (2014). A framework of measuring the impact of market orientation on the outcome of higher education institutions mediated by innovation. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3(2), 607-624.
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396-402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783
Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Market orientation and the new product paradox. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00145.x
Cabrito, B. G. (2004). Higher education: An education for the elites? The Portuguese case. Higher Education in Europe, 29(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720410001673283
Cadogan, J. W., & Cui, C. C. (2004). Chinese export agents’ adoption of export market-oriented behaviors: Measurement and performance relationship. Journal of Asia Pacific Marketing, 3(2), 21-37.
Collins, J. (1990). A market performance comparison of US firms active in domestic, developed and developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(2), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490335
Deshpande, R., & Farley, J. U. (2004). Organizational culture, market orientation, innovativeness, and firm performance: An international research odyssey. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.04.002
Douglas, S., & Craig, C. (1983). Examining performance of US multinationals in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(3), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490527
Ferreira, A. I., & Hill, M. M. (2007). Organizational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study. Higher Education, 55, 637-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9080-6
Flavian, C., & Lozano, J. (2006). Organizational antecedents of market orientation in the public university system. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(5), 447-467. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610677771
Frambach, R., Prabhu, J., & Verhallen, T. (2003). The influence of business strategy on new product activity: The role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20, 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.03.003
Grinstein, A. (2008). The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0053-1
Hemsley-Brown J. V., & Oplatka, I. (2010). Market orientation in universities: A comparative study of two national higher education systems. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(3), 204-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011031565
Hooley, G., Fahy, J., Greenley, G., Beracs, J., Fonfara, K., & Snoj, B. (2003). Market orientation in the service sector of the transition economies of Central Europe. European Journal of Marketing, 37(1), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310453975
Im, S., & Workman, J. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68, 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.114.27788
Johnson, J. L., Cullen, J. B., Sakano, T., & Bronson, J. W. (2001). Drivers and outcomes of parent company intervention in IJV management: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Research, 52, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00081-8
Julian, C. C. (2010). The market orientation-marketing performance relationship: The empirical link in international joint ventures. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 3, 414-431. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2010.035758
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251866
Kotler, P., Adam, S., Brown, L., & Armstrong, G. (2008). Principles of marketing (4th ed.). Sydney, Australia: Prentice Hall.
Kyriakopoulos, K., & Moorman, C. (2004). Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.01.001
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251757
Oczkowski, E., & Farrell, M. A. (1998). Discriminating between measurement scales using non-parametric tests and two stage least squares estimators: The case of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(4), 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(98)00007-X
Pelham, A. M. (1997), Mediating influences on the relationship between market orientation and profitability in small industrial firms. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 5(3), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1997.11501771
Racela, O., Chaikittisilpa, C., & Thoumrungroje, A. (2007). Market orientation, international business relationships and perceived export performance. International Marketing Review, 24(2), 144-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330710741794
Rose, G. M., & Shoham, A. (2002). Export performance and market orientation: Establishing an empirical link. Journal of Business Research, 55, 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00139-9
Sefnedi & Sallam, M. A. (2016). The marketing competency-export performance relationship: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Research Science & Management. 3(5), 1-9.
Sin, L. Y. M., Tse, A. C. B., Yau, O. H. M., Chow, R. P. M., & Lee, J. S. Y. (2005). Market orientation, relationship market orientation, and business performance: The moderating effects of economic ideology and industry type. Journal of International Marketing, 13(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.13.1.36.58538
Singh, S. (2009). How market orientation and outsourcing create capability and impact business performance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 51, 457-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20283
Zebal, M. A., & Goodwin, D. R. (2012). Market oriantation and performance in private universities. Marketing Intelegence and Planning, 30(3), 79-92.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
