BEYOND MOTIVATION AND HEAVY WORK INVESTMENT: THE CRITICAL ROLE OF BEHAVIORAL-FOCUSED SELF-LEADERSHIP IN ACHIEVING ACADEMIC RESEARCH PERFORMANCE

Herta Napitupulu

Abstract


Many studies highlight the influence of motivation on lecturers' research performance. However, further research is needed to understand the mechanism behind this relationship better. This research aims to determine how behavioral-focused self-leadership and heavy work investment mediate extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to improve academic research performance. Based on social cognitive theory, extrinsic and intrinsic motivation enable individuals to develop strategies and expend effort to achieve expected performance. Data was collected through an online survey involving lecturers at universities in Indonesia (N = 216). The instrument used in the form of a questionnaire was developed from several measuring tools that have been widely used and have been validated. Data analysis was carried out using PLS-SEM. Research findings reveal that behavioral-focused self-leadership directly influences academic research performance and mediates the relationship between academic extrinsic motivation and academic intrinsic motivation on academic research performance. Academic extrinsic and intrinsic motivation have a positive effect on heavy work investment. However, in this study, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that there is a significant influence between heavy work investment and academic research performance. These findings indicate that more than heavy work investment is needed to influence academic research performance significantly. These results expand our understanding of the existing literature on work motivation and self-leadership. These findings have implications for higher education management. Emphasis on developing behavioral-focused self-leadership strategies for lecturers' human resources will increase the effectiveness of heavy work investments and prevent mental health problems that workaholic tendencies may cause.

 

Abstrak dalam Bahasa Indonesia 

Banyak penelitian menyoroti pengaruh motivasi terhadap kinerja penelitian dosen. Namun, penelitian lebih lanjut diperlukan untuk memahami mekanisme di balik hubungan ini dengan lebih baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan bagaimana kepemimpinan diri yang berfokus pada perilaku dan investasi kerja yang berat memediasi motivasi ekstrinsik dan intrinsik untuk meningkatkan kinerja penelitian akademik. Berdasarkan teori kognitif sosial, motivasi ekstrinsik dan intrinsik memungkinkan individu mengembangkan strategi dan mengeluarkan usaha untuk mencapai kinerja yang diharapkan. Data dikumpulkan melalui survei online yang melibatkan dosen di universitas di Indonesia (N = 216). Instrumen yang digunakan berupa kuesioner dikembangkan dari beberapa alat ukur yang telah banyak digunakan dan telah divalidasi. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan PLS-SEM. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa kepemimpinan diri yang berfokus pada perilaku secara langsung memengaruhi kinerja penelitian akademik dan memediasi hubungan antara motivasi ekstrinsik akademik dan motivasi intrinsik akademik terhadap kinerja penelitian akademik. Motivasi ekstrinsik dan intrinsik akademik memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap investasi kerja yang berat. Namun, dalam penelitian ini, tidak ada cukup bukti yang menunjukkan adanya pengaruh signifikan antara investasi kerja yang berat dan kinerja penelitian akademik. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa investasi kerja yang berat saja tidak cukup untuk mempengaruhi kinerja penelitian akademik secara signifikan. Hasil ini memperluas pemahaman kita tentang literatur yang ada mengenai motivasi kerja dan kepemimpinan diri. Temuan ini memiliki implikasi bagi manajemen pendidikan tinggi. Penekanan pada pengembangan strategi kepemimpinan diri yang berfokus pada perilaku untuk sumber daya manusia dosen akan meningkatkan efektivitas investasi kerja yang berat dan mencegah masalah kesehatan mental yang mungkin disebabkan oleh kecenderungan kerja berlebihan.


Keywords


Behavioral-Focused Strategy; Self-Leadership; Academic Research Performance; Higher Education



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/derema.v19i2.8460

Full Text

PDF

References


Acosta‐Prado, J. C., Tafur‐mendoza, A. A., Zárate‐torres, R. A., & Ramírez‐ospina, D. E. (2021). Psychometric properties of heavy work investment measures: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212539

Astakhova, M., & Hogue, M. (2014). A heavy work investment typology: A biopsychosocial framework. In Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29,(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2013-0140

Ballestar, M. T., Doncel, L. M., Sainz, J., & Ortigosa-Blanch, A. (2019). A novel machine learning approach for evaluation of public policies: An application in relation to the performance of university researchers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 149, 119756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119756

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., Ringle, C. M., & Völckner, F. (2013). Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.01

Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Cauwels, P., & Sornette, D. (2022). Are ‘flow of ideas’ and ‘research productivity’ in secular decline? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121267

Daumiller, M., Siegel, S., & Dresel, M. (2019). Construction and validation of a short multidisciplinary research performance questionnaire (SMRPQ). Research Evaluation, 28(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz009

Diop, S., & Asongu, S. A. (2023). Research productivity: Trend and comparative analyses by regions and continents. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00934-x

Fachriansyah, K., & Wulandari, C. (2022). Manajemen talenta riset dan inovasi Indonesia: Formulasi kebijakan menuju SDM unggul. Bappenas Working Papers, 5(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v5i1.115

Fauzi, M. A., Nya-Ling, C. T., Thursamy, R., & Ojo, A. O. (2019). Knowledge sharing: Role of academics towards research productivity in higher learning institution. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 49(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2018-0074

Garas, L., Aziz, S., Wuensch, K., & Waterwall, B. (2023). Motivational drivers of heavy work investment: Intercultural comparison between USA and Egypt. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 16(5/6), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-10-2022-0169

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. www.cengage.com/highered

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Harari, M. B., Williams, E. A., Castro, S. L., & Brant, K. K. (2021). Self-leadership: A meta-analysis of over two decades of research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(4), 890–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12365

Heng, K., Hamid, M. O., & Khan, A. (2020). Factors influencing academics’ research engagement and productivity: A developing countries perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 30(3), 965–987. http://www.iier.org.au/iier30/heng.pdf

Henry, C., Md Ghani, N. A., Hamid, U. M. A., & Bakar, A. N. (2020). Factors contributing towards research productivity in higher education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20420

Houghton, J. D., Dawley, D., & Diliello, T. C. (2012). The Abbreviated Self-Leadership Questionnaire (ASLQ): A more concise measure of self-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(2).

Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672–691. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940210450484

Huang, Z., Zong, Q., & Xie, Y. (2023). The individual characteristics, organizational characteristics and research productivity of early career LIS researchers in China’s mainland: A crisp set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA). Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(3), 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221097406

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLoS Biology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468

Kalyar, M. N. (2011). Creativity, self-leadership and individual innovation. The Journal of Commerce, 3(3).

Klieme, K. E., & Schmidt-Borcherding, F. (2023). Lacking measurement invariance in research self-efficacy: Bug or feature? Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1092714

Knotts, K., Houghton, J. D., Pearce, C. L., Chen, H., Stewart, G. L., & Manz, C. C. (2022). Leading from the inside out: A meta-analysis of how, when, and why self-leadership affects individual outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1953988

Lambovska, M., & Yordanov, K. (2020). Motivation of researchers to publish in high-quality journals: A theoretical framework. TEM Journal, 9(1), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM91-27

Liengaard, B. D., Sharma, P. N., Hult, G. T. M., Jensen, M. B., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Prediction: Coveted, yet forsaken? Introducing a cross‐validated predictive ability test in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Decision Sciences, 52(2), 362–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12445

Lin, C.-J. (2017). A multi-level test for social regulatory focus and team member creativity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(8), 1057–1077. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2016-0125

Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585. https://doi.org/10.2307/258312

Ocampo, L., Aro, J. L., Evangelista, S. S., Maturan, F., Yamagishi, K., Mamhot, D., Mamhot, D. F., Calibo-Senit, D. I., Tibay, E., Pepito, J., & Quiñones, R. (2022). Research productivity for augmenting the innovation potential of higher education institutions: An interpretive structural modeling approach and MICMAC analysis. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030148

Park, Y., Song, J. H., & Lim, D. H. (2016). Organizational justice and work engagement: the mediating effect of self-leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 37(6), 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2014-0192

Pătărlăgeanu, S. R., Rădulescu, C. V., Dinu, M., & Constantin, M. (2020). The impact of heavy work investment on the economy and the individual. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(14), 1085–1102. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2020/S14/1085

Perdomo-Ortiz, J., Valencia, C., Durán, W. F., & Heredia, O. (2021). Effect of high-performance work practices on academic research productivity. Latin American Business Review, 22(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2020.1837632

Politis, J. D. (2006). Self-leadership behavioural-focused strategies and team performance: The mediating influence of job satisfaction. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730610657721

Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Ryazanova, O., & Jaskiene, J. (2022). Managing individual research productivity in academic organizations: A review of the evidence and a path forward. Research Policy, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104448

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2019). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. Advances in Motivation Science, 8, 153–179. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001

Scimago Lab. (2024, March). Scimago Journal & Country Rank. https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?region=Asiatic%20Region

Sharma, P. N., Liengaard, B. D., Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2023). Predictive model assessment and selection in composite-based modeling using PLS-SEM: extensions and guidelines for using CVPAT. European Journal of Marketing, 57(6), 1662–1677. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2020-0636

Sharma, P. N., Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N., & Ray, S. (2021). Prediction‐oriented model selection in Partial Least Squares path modeling. Decision Sciences, 52(3), 567–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12329

Shkoler, O., & Kimura, T. (2020). How does work motivation impact employees’ investment at work and their job engagement? A moderated-moderation perspective through an international lens. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00038

Snir, R. (2018). A longitudinal study of heavy time investment in work. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2017-1143

Snir, R., & Harpaz, I. (2012). Beyond workaholism: Towards a general model of heavy work investment. Human Resource Management Review, 22(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.011

Stupnisky, R. H., Larivière, V., Hall, N. C., & Omojiba, O. (2023). Predicting research productivity in STEM faculty: The role of self-determined motivation. Research in Higher Education, 64(4), 598–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09718-3

Sukoco, B. M., Putra, R. A., Muqaffi, H. N., Lutfian, M. V., & Wicaksono, H. (2023). Comparative study of ASEAN research productivity. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221145157

Tabak, F., Tziner, A., Shkoler, O., & Rabenu, E. (2021). The complexity of Heavy Work Investment (HWI): A conceptual integration and review of antecedents, dimensions, and outcomes. Sustainability, 13(14), 7803. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147803

Taris, T. W., van Beek, I., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2020). The motivational make-up of workaholism and work engagement: A longitudinal study on need satisfaction, motivation, and heavy work investment. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01419

Tartari, V., Di Lorenzo, F., & Campbell, B. A. (2020). “Another Roof, Another Proof”: The impact of mobility on individual productivity in science. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 276–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9681-5

Tuan, N. A., Hue, T. T., Lien, L. T., Van, L. H., Nhung, H. T. T., & Dat, L. Q. (2022). Management factors influencing lecturers’ research productivity in Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam: A structural equation modeling analysis. Heliyon, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10510

Tziner, A., Buzea, C., Rabenu, E., Shkoler, O., & Truţa, C. (2019). Understanding the relationship between antecedents of Heavy Work Investment (HWI) and burnout. Amfiteatru Economic, 21(50), 128–128. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2019/50/153

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025

van Beek, I., Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Brenninkmeijer, V. (2014). Heavy work investment: Its motivational make-up and outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2013-0166

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.

Wahid, N., Warraich, N. F., & Tahira, M. (2022). Factors influencing scholarly publication productivity: A systematic review. Information Discovery and Delivery, 50(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-04-2020-0036


Cited by

  • There are currently no citations to this article.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Herta Napitupulu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

favicon Department of Management | Business School | Universitas Pelita Harapan | Indonesia | +62 21 546 0901 |  jurnal.derema@uph.edu

 

slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor