Rasio Utang Memediasi Pengaruh Kemampulabaan Dan Ukuran Aktiva Terhadap Kebijakan Dividen: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia [Debt Ratio to Mediate Effect of Profitability and Asset Size on Dividend Policy: An Empirical Study on Oil Palm Plantation Companies Listed with the Indonesia Stock Exchange]

Rudolf Lumbantobing

Abstract


This research explores the influence of the debt policy, profitability, and size of asset toward company's dividend policy on oil palm plantation companies listed with the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the years 2011-2015. The secondary data used in this research were obtained directly from the company website and the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The data collection was conducted by direct observation upon the research object. The data were analyzed using path analysis and logistical regression model. The result showed that profitability has a significant and negative effect on the debt ratio. Size of asset does not have a significant and positive effect on the debt ratio. Profitability and size of assets have significant and positive effects on dividend policy, which proves that the larger profitability and the size of assets, the greater the probabilty of paying dividends. Debt ratio does not have a significant and positive effect on dividend policy. Debt ratio has a significant positively partial mediating effect toward the influence of profitability on dividend policy. Otherwise, debt ratio does not have a significant negatively mediating effect toward the positive effect of size of asset on dividend policy. 

BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRAK: Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi engaruh kebijakan utang, kemampulabaan dan ukuran aktiva terhadap kebijakan dividen perusahaan perkebunan kelapa sawit yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode tahun 2011-2015. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang diperoleh secara langsung dari website perusahaan dan Bursa Efek Indonesia. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan observasi tidak langsung terhadap objek penelitian yaitu perusahaan kelapa sawit. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan path analysis dan model regresi logistik. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bukti bahwa kemampulabaan signifikan berpengaruh negatif terhadap rasio utang. Ukuran aktiva tidak signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap rasio utang. Kemampulabaan signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap kebijakan dividen, yang menunjukkan bukti bahwa semakin besar kemampulabaan maka semakin besar probabilitas perusahaan membayarkan dividen. Ukuran aktiva signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap kebijakan dividen yang berarti semakin besar ukuran aktiva maka semakin besar probabilitas perusahaan membayar dividen. Rasio utang tidak signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap kebijakan dividen. Kebijakan dividen tidak dipengaruhi oleh leverage perusahaan. Rasio utang signifikan memediasi positif secara parsial pengaruh positif kemampulabaan terhadap kebijakan dividen. Namun, rasio utang tidak signifikan memediasi negatif pengaruh positif ukuran aktiva terhadap kebijakan dividen.

 


Keywords


debt ratio; profitability; size; dividend; path analysis



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/derema.v12i1.412

References


Adediran , S. A., & Alade, S. O. (2013). Dividend policy and corporate performance in Nigeria. American Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 4(2), 71-77.

Bruner, R. F., Eades, K. M., & Schill, M. J. (2010). Case studies in finance: Managing for corporate value creation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cai, F., & Ghosh, A. (2003), Test of capital structure theory: A binomial approach. Journal of Business and Economics Studies, 9(2), 20-32.

Cassar, G., & Holmes, S. (2003). Capital structure and financing of smes: Australian evidence. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 43(2), 123- 147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-629X.t01-1-00085

Chen, J., & Strange, R. (2005). The determinants of capital structure: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Economic Change and Restructing, 38, 11-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-005-4521-7

Hussain, M., & Usman, M. (2013). Investment opportunities and dividend yield (Evidence from KSE). International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, 4(11), 12-16. Retrieved from http://www.ijmse.org/Volume4/Issue11/paper3.pdf

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976), Theory of firm: Theory of firm managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jensen, G. R., Solberg, D. P., & Zorn, T. S. (1992). Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt and dividend policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 21, 131-144. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331370

Iskandar, L. R. (2016). Efek hutang, profitabilitas, dan ukuran perusahaan pada kebijakan dividen perusahaan perkebunan kelapa sawit yang listed di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode tahun 2010-2014. Tesis Magister Manajemen. Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana.

Low, P. Y., & Chen, K. H. (2004). Diversification and capital structure: Some international evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 23, 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REQU.0000037064.15144.04

Lumbantobing, R. (2014). Model persamaan berjenjang struktur modal: pandangan teori trade-off, teori pecking order, teori keagenan, dan teori kontingensi dalam upaya mengoptimalkan struktur modal perusahaan yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia periode 2006-2012. Proceding Call For Paper. Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Bandung, Mei 2014, 5.

Lumbantobing, R. (2016). Kekuatan financial leverage perusahaan terbuka sebagai replika dasar untuk membangun kreativitas, sinergi dan daya saing industri kreatif di Indonesia. Proceding Call For Paper. Konferensi Nasional Riset Manajemen X, Lombok, 20-22 September, 2016.

Meilina. (2015). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi kebijakan dividen dengan size (ukuran perusahaan) sebagai variabel moderasi pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Skripsi. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Myers, S. C. (2001). Capital structure. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.81

Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0

Nurdiansyah, M. (2011). Peluang dan prospek bisnis kelapa sawit di Indonesia. Lingkungan Bisnis.

Putri, D. A. (2013). Pengaruh investment opportunity set, kebijakan utang dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kebijakan dividen pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Universitas Negeri Padang, 1-13.

Ramasamy, B., Ong, D., & Yeung, M. C. H. (2005). Firm size, ownership and performance in the Malaysian palm oil industry. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance. 1, 81-104.

Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., Jaffe, J., & Jordan, B. D. (2009). Modern financial management (International ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.

Sarkaria, M. S., & Shergill, G. S. (2000). Market structure and financial performance – An Indian evidence with enhanced controls. Indian Economic Journal, 48(2), 98–105.

Supriyono, R. A. (2005). Pengaruh variabel perantara kecukupan anggaran dan partisipasi penganggaran terhadap hubungan antara komitmen organisasi dan kinerja manajer di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonom Perusahaan. 12(1), 13-29.

Tong, G., & Green, C. J. (2005). Pecking order or trade-off hypothesis? Evidence on the capital structure of Chinese companies. Applied Economics, 37, 2179-2189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500319873


Cited by

  • There are currently no citations to this article.




Copyright (c) 2017 Rudolf Lumbantobing

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


favicon Department of Management | Business School | Universitas Pelita Harapan | Indonesia | +62 21 546 0901 |  jurnal.derema@uph.edu