Analisis Hukum terhadap Kasus Kartel dalam Industri Minyak Goreng: Penerapan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia
Keywords:
Cartel, Indirect Evidence, Competition Law, KPPU, Cooking Oil IndustryAbstract
This article analyzes the legal aspects of cartel practices in Indonesia’s cooking oil industry, focusing on the effectiveness of indirect evidence in proving cartel violations and the legal considerations of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU), District Court, and Supreme Court. Using a normative juridical approach, the study examines statutory and case law, particularly KPPU Decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009, which found 20 major companies guilty of cartel practices through price-fixing and market control. KPPU relied on indirect evidence, such as price parallelism and communication patterns, due to the covert nature of cartels. However, the District Court and Supreme Court rejected KPPU’s decision, citing insufficient direct evidence and the failure to meet the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard. The findings highlight the challenges of enforcing competition law in Indonesia, especially regarding the acceptance of indirect evidence in court, and underscore the need for stronger legal frameworks to effectively combat anti-competitive practices.
References
Ibrahim, Johnny. Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2007.
Indonesia.go.id. “Produsen Minyak Sawit Terbesar di Dunia”. 15 Januari 2025. https://www.indonesia.go.id
Marina, Anna, and Didin Fatihudin. “Pasar Oligopoli di Indonesia (Kasus Trading Term dan Dominansi Carrefour pada Pasar Ritel Modern di Indonesia).” Balance Economics, Business, Management and Accounting Journal 5, no. 9 (July 2008). https://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/balance/article/view/695
Nugroho, Susanti Adi. Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia dalam Teori dan Praktik serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, 2012.
Paparang, Joshua Anggelito. “Tugas dan Wewenang Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha,” Lex Privatum 7, no. 7 (Okt-Des 2019): 32–34, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/28506/27858.
Putusan KPPU No. 24/KPPU-I/2009 tentang Kartel Minyak Goreng
siplawfirm.id. “Indirect Evidence dalam Suatu Tinjauan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.” 15 November 2023. https://siplawfirm.id/persaingan-usaha-tidak-sehat/?lang=id
Ulya, Rafa’any Darajatanti, Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian, dan Indra Rahmatullah. “Pembuktian Tidak Langsung dalam Praktik Kartel pada Industri Minyak Goreng.” Skripsi, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2020. https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/jlr/article/view/17788
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Lembaran Negara Tahun 1999 Nomor 33, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 3817.
Wintansari, Yuniar Hayu. “Analisis Pertimbangan Hukum Kasus Kartel Minyak Goreng Di Indonesia”. Lex Renaissance 5, no. 4 (Agustus, 2021): 895–911. https://journal.uii.ac.id/Lex-Renaissance/article/view/18111
Kongres, Evi, Fajar Sugianto, Erny Herlin Setyorini, Bariyima Sylvester Kokpan, and Sheng Zhang. “Protecting Consumers Against Defamation Claims: The Role of Common Interest in Product Reviews.” Khazanah Hukum 6, no. 3 (2024): 294–310.
Sugianto, Fajar. “ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CONTRACT LAW : HOW THE EYES OF ECONOMICS WORK WHILE DELIVERING JUSTICE WITH UNPREJUDICED HANDS OF EXISTING INDONESIAN CONTRACT LAW
SUGIANTO, Fajar. “Common Dimensions of Law and Economics in Contract Law.” Journal of International T 11, no. 1 (2025): 51–60. https://www.jital.org/index.php/jital/article/view/555/pdf_295.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Felicia Angeline, Marsha Carolina Wijaya, Sherryl Aurellia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
