Debriefing and Clinical Judgment Ability in Nursing Education: A Scoping Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/nc.v13i2.10034Trefwoorden:
Clinical Judgment, Debriefing, Education, nursing, nursing studentsSamenvatting
Clinical judgment is a critical competence for nursing students, yet its development remains inconsistent across nursing programs. Debriefing has emerged as a promising educational strategy to enhance this ability, particularly when integrated with simulation-based learning. The Method used a scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework to identify debriefing techniques used in undergraduate nursing education, their outcomes on clinical judgment, and learning activities that support their development. Fourteen studies published between 2016 and 2024 were included from three databases (ProQuest, MEDLINE, and PubMed). Inclusion criteria were English-language, full-text available, and focused on undergraduate nursing education. Results of this study are structured and theory-based debriefing methods were found to significantly improve nursing students’ clinical judgment, particularly in noticing, interpreting, and reflecting. Simulation-based learning combined with reflective debriefing and clinical placements further supported skill transfer into real practice settings. The conclusion is that structured and theory-informed debriefing significantly enhances clinical judgment in nursing education. Integrating reflective debriefing into simulation and clinical learning activities is essential to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical competence. Recommendation is that educators are encouraged to adopt structured, theory-based debriefing models and ensure that facilitators receive proper training. Future research should explore longitudinal and interprofessional effects of debriefing on clinical competence.
Referenties
Alanezi, F. Z., Morrison, C. F., Wagner, R., Kelcey, B., & Miller, E. (2025). The effect of hot and cold debriefing on basic life support competence and reflection in undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 83(February), 104292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104292
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Ayed, A., Khalaf, I. A., Fashafsheh, I., Saleh, A., Bawadi, H., Abuidhail, J., Thultheen, I., & Joudallah, H. (2022). Effect of high-fidelity simulation on clinical judgment among nursing students. Inquiry (United States), 59, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580221081997
Bortolato-Major, C., Mantovani, M. de F., Felix, J. V. C., Boostel, R., da Silva, Â. T. M., & Caravaca-Morera, J. A. (2019). Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: A cross-sectional study. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 72(3), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0103
Bussard, M. E., Jessee, M. A., El-Banna, M. M., Cantrell, M. A., Alrimawi, I., Marchi, N. M., Gonzalez, L. I., Rischer, K., Coy, M. L., Poledna, M., & Lavoie, P. (2024). Current practices for assessing clinical judgment in nursing students and new graduates: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEDT.2023.106078
Daneshfar, M., & Moonaghi, H. K. (2025). The impact of clinical simulation on bridging the theory–practice gap in nursing education: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12909-025-07790-8/TABLES/1
Davis, R. G., & Wood, F. G. (2022). Cultivating clinical judgment in pharmacological decision-making through reflection on practice. Journal of Nursing Education, 61(3), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20211128-10
Dix, S., Morphet, J., Jones, T., Kiprillis, N., O’Halloran, M., Piper, K., & Innes, K. (2021). Perceptions of final year nursing students transer of clinical judgement skills from simulation to clinical practice: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 56(September). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103218
Dreifuerst, K. T. (2015). Getting started with debriefing for meaningful learning. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(5), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.005
Fisher, M. E. M., & Oudshoorn, A. (2019). Debriefing for professional practice placements in nursing: A concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives, 40(4), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000487
Gonzalez, L., & Nielsen, A. (2024). An integrative review of teaching strategies to support clinical judgment development in clinical education for nurses. Nurse Education Today, 133(April 2023), 106047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106047
Hines, C. B., & Wood, F. G. (2016). Clinical judgment scripts as a strategy to foster clinical judgments. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(12), 691–695. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20161114-05
Høegh-Larsen, A. M., Gonzalez, M. T., Reierson, I. Å., Husebø, S. I. E., Hofoss, D., & Ravik, M. (2023). Nursing students’ clinical judgment skills in simulation and clinical placement: A comparison of student self-assessment and evaluator assessment. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01220-0
INACSL Standards Committee, Decker, S., Alinier, G., Crawford, S. B., Gordon, R. M., Jenkins, D., & Wilson, C. (2021). Healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTM the debriefing process. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.011
International Council of Nursing. (n.d.). Current nursing definitions | ICN - International Council of Nurses. Retrieved May 19, 2025, from https://www.icn.ch/resources/nursing-definitions/current-nursing-definitions
Jang, A. R., & Moon, J. E. (2021). The effect of nursing simulation on the clinical judgment of nursing care for patients with increased intracranial pressure (IICP). Iranian Journal of Public Health, 50(10), 2055–2064. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i10.7506
Janicas, R. de C. S. V., & Narchi, N. Z. (2019). Evaluation of nursing students’ learning using realistic scenarios with and without debriefing. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 27. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2936.3187
Jessee, M. A. (2021). An update on clinical judgment in nursing and implications for education, practice, and regulation. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 12(3), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(21)00116-2
Johnston, S. (2019). An evaluation of simulation debriefings on student nurses’ perceptions of clinical reasoning and learning transfer: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNES-2018-0045,
Johnston, S., Coyer, F., & Nash, R. (2017). Simulation debriefing based on principles of transfer of learning: A pilot study. Nurse Education in Practice, 26, 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.002
Kavanagh, J. M., & Szweda, C. (2017). A crisis in competency: The strategic and ethical imperative to assessing new graduate nurses’ clinical reasoning. Nursing Education Perspectives, 38(2), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000112,
Lasater, K. (2011). Clinical judgment: The last frontier for evaluation. Nurse Education in Practice, 11(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.013
Lavoie, P., Pepin, J., & Cossette, S. (2017). Contribution of a reflective debriefing to nursing students’ clinical judgment in patient deterioration simulations: A mixed-methods study. Nurse Education Today, 50, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.002
Lazzara, L. (2020). Implementation of the lasater clinical judgment rubric as a progress review tool. Nursing DNP Projects, 35. https://openriver.winona.edu/nursingdnp/35
Liou, S. R., Liu, H. C., Tsai, S. L., Chu, T. P., & Cheng, C. Y. (2020). Performance competence of pregraduate nursing students and hospital nurses: A comparison study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(13–14), 2652–2662. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15287
Lomuscio, S., Capogna, E., Sironi, S., Sguanci, M., Morales Palomares, S., Cangelosi, G., Ferrara, G., Mancin, S., Amodeo, A., Destrebecq, A., Parozzi, M., & Dal Bello, S. (2025). Debriefing methodologies in nursing simulation: An exploratory study of the italian settings. Nursing Reports, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15010007
Merduaty, R. C., & Arum, A. addillah. (2023). How guided self-reflection improves critical thinking of nursing students in the pre-clinical stage? Journal of Holistic Nursing, 10(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.31603/nursing.v0i0.8876
Morse, K. J., Fey, M. K., & Forneris, S. G. (2021). Evidence-based debriefing. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 39(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1891/0739-6686.39.129
Oh, Y. J., Kang, H. Y., Song, Y., & Lindquist, R. (2021). Effects of a transformative learning theory based debriefing in simulation: A randomized trial. Nurse Education in Practice, 50(December 2020), 102962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102962
Park, Y. S., Lee, S. J., & Hur, Y. (2025). Facilitators, barriers, and future direction of high-fidelity simulation in nursing education: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12912-025-03541-8/TABLES/1
Pérez-Perdomo, A., & Zabalegui, A. (2024). Teaching strategies for developing clinical reasoning skills in nursing students: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Healthcare (Switzerland), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010090
Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Khalil, H. (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). The Joanna Briggs Institute, March, 32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIRM-20-01
Pouralizadeh, M., Khankeh, H., Ebadi, A., & Dalvandi, A. (2017). Factors influencing nursing students’ clinical judgment: A qualitative directed content analysis in an Iranian context. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(5), JC01–JC04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/25753.9822
Reed, S. J. (2020). Measuring learning and engagement during debriefing: A new instrument. clinical simulation in nursing, 46, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.03.002
Reierson, I. Å., Haukedal, T. A., Hedeman, H., & Bjørk, I. T. (2017). Structured debriefing : What difference does it make ? Nurse Education in Practice, 25, 104–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.04.013
Secheresse, T., Lima, L., & Pansu, P. (2021). Focusing on explicit debriefing for novice learners in healthcare simulations: A randomized prospective study. Nurse Education in Practice, 51, 102914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102914
Shinnick, M. A., Woo, M., Horwich, T. B., & Steadman, R. (2011). Debriefing: The most important component in simulation? Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 7(3), e105–e111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECNS.2010.11.005
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850,
Vreugdenhil, J., Broeksma, L., Teuwen, C., Custers, E., Reinders, M., Dobber, J., & Kusurkar, R. A. (2024). Debriefing to nurture clinical reasoning in nursing students: A design-based research study. Nurse Education Today, 143(September). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106402
Yang, F., Wang, Y., Yang, C., Zhou, M. H., Shu, J., Fu, B., & Hu, H. (2019). Improving clinical judgment by simulation: A randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1454-9
Yang, J., Zhou, W. J., Zhou, S. C., Luo, D., Liu, Q., Wang, A. L., Yu, S. H., Zhu, X. P., He, X. Y., Hu, F., Yang, B. X., & Chen, J. (2024). Integrated virtual simulation and face-to-face simulation for clinical judgment training among undergraduate nursing students: A mixed-methods study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04988-6
##submission.downloads##
Gepubliceerd
Citeerhulp
Nummer
Sectie
Licentie
Copyright (c) 2025 Sarah Lidya Cicilia, Marisa Junianti Manik

Dit werk wordt verdeeld onder een Naamsvermelding-GelijkDelen 4.0 Internationaal licentie.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
