Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Efficiency Approach with the Establishment of a State Institution Managing Funding and CSR Programs
Abstract
CSR is an activity that provides broader benefits in various social aspects such as education, health, community empowerment or environmental preservation. CSR actions applied as a strategy will only cause irregularities in the use of funds owned by the company which can trigger to damage to the company's financial performance. This is thought to be due to the fact that there are quite a lot of funds budgeted with the CSR implementation which is not supervised, which causes inefficiency. This study aims to determine and analyze the provisions of the laws and regulations that govern CSR related to the obligations of Limited Liability Companies in the Indonesian legal system and to find out and analyze the implementation of company obligations to implement CSR in Indonesia and find solutions to corporate liability arrangements such as Limited Liability Companies (PT), Enterprises. Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (UMKM) and other businesses carry out CSR to be useful in accordance with that CSR. The approach used is the Legislative Law approach and the case approach. From the research results it is known that 1). CSR regulations concerning the obligation of PT to implement it in the Indonesian legal framework are regulated in several laws but there are 2 (two) laws that specifically regulate CSR but the two laws are inconsistent with regard to sanctions if these obligations are violated, 2) Implementation of PT obligations implementing CSR in Indonesia is a program carried out by the company that is not in accordance with the community needs, is carried out individually, is moving and it’s not sustainable, there is no provision that regulates the amount of funds and there is no supervision from the local government in managing CSR. The occurrence of overlapping laws and regulations so that the implementation of the CSR program does not match the policies issued by the local government. CSR funds are misused and even corrupted by local officials and there is no evaluation by the company because it is more concerned with profit in carrying out CSR. 3). Regulating company obligations such as Limited Liability Companies (PT), Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and other businesses implementing CSR so that it is useful, it is necessary to establish a state institution that manages CSR and accommodates the companies’, government’s and society interests so that the CSR program can run efficiently, precisely targeted and continuously.
Keywords
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/glr.v1i1.2809
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ara. 2019. “CSR KKS PT Ophir Dinilai Salah Sasaran, Warga Giligenting Demo.” Kabar Madura. 2019. https://kabarmadura.id/csr-kks-pt-ophir-dinilai-salah-sasaran-warga-giligenting-demo/.
Asdhiana, I Made. 2010. “Dana CSR Belum Dikelola Optimal.” Kompas. 2010. https://lifestyle.kompas.com/read/2010/10/20/21513650/dana.csr.belum.dikelola.optimal
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2010. Perkembangan & Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Amandemen. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
DJPP. n.d. “Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Dan Iklim Penanaman Modal.” Departemen Hukum Dan HAM Republik Indonesia. Accessed May 18, 2020. http://www.djpp.depkumham.go.id/hukum-bisnis/84-tanggung-jawab-sosial-perusahaan-corporate-social-responsibility-dan-iklim-penanaman-modal.html.
Fajar, Mukti. 2009. Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Di Indonesia, Mandatory vs Voluntary, Study about Application of Corporate Social Responsibility Provisions on Multi Nasional Company, Swasta Nasional Dan Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Hadjon, Philipus M. 1982. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Sebuah Studi Tentang Penanganannya Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum Dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Hakim, Lukman. 2011. “Rekonstruksi Peran Negara Dalam Penyelenggaraan Negara Secara Konstitusional.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 40, no. 2. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/10476.
Halim, A. Ridwan. 1985. Hukum Perdata Dalam Tanya Jawab. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hermann, Kristina K. 2004. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development: The European Union Initiative as a Case Study.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 11, no. 2: 205. https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2004.11.2.205.
Indonesia. 1945. The 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia.
_______. 2003. Law Number 19 Year 2003 Concerning State-Owned Enterprises.
_______. 2007. Law Number 25 Year 2007 Concerning Investment.
_______. 2007. Law Number 40 Year 2007 Concerning Limited Liability Companies.
_______. 2009. Law Number 32 Year 2009 Concerning Environmental Management.
_______. 2009. Law Number 4 Year 2009 Concerning Mineral and Coal Mining.
_______. 2012. Government Regulation Number 47 Year 2012 Concerning Social and Environmental Responsibility of Limited Liability Companies.
Keraf, Sony, and Robert Haryono Imam. 1993. Etika Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Filsafat Kanisius.
Margaretha, Farah, and Chandra Gunadi Witedjo. 2017. “Corporate Social Responsibility, Nilai Perusahaan Dan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan.” Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing Dan Informasi 14, no. 1: 89–114. https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v14i1.1754.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2010. Penelitian Hukum. Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Maybank Indonesia. n.d. “Corporate Responsibility.” Accessed November 15, 2019. https://www.maybank.co.id/corporateinformation/csr.
Minister of State-Owned Enterprise of the Republic of Indonesia. 2007. Regulation of the Minister of State-Owned Enterprise Number PER.No.05/MBU/2007 Concerning the Partnership Program of State-Owned Enterprises with Small Businesses and the Community Development Program.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. 2004. Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: P.T. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Pertamina. n.d. “Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan.” Accessed October 1, 2019. https://www.pertamina.com/id/tanggung-jawab-sosial-perusahaan.
Poerwanto. 2010. Corporate Social Responsibilty: Menjinakkan Gejolak Sosial Di Era Pornografi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rusdianto, Ujang. 2013. CSR Communications. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Salim, H. S. 2008. Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Soares, Singgih. 2019. “Dugaan CSR Salah Sasaran, BPK Periksa Hutama Karya.” Tempo. 2019. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/670518/dugaan-csr-salah-sasaran-bpk-periksa-hutama-karya/full &view=ok.
Syamsi, Ibnu. 2004. Efisiensi, Sistem, Dan Prosedur Kerja. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Tutik, Titik Triwulan. 2008. Hukum Perdata Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Wibisono, Yusuf. 2007. Membelah Konsep Dan Aplikasi Corporate Social Responsibility. Gresik: Fascho Publishing.
Yamin, Muhammad. 1982. Proklamasi Dan Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Agustinus Soetrisno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Faculty of Law | Universitas Pelita Harapan | glr@uph.edu