Summary Proof of Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Through Act Number 37 of 2004 (Study of Decision Number 7/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2022/PN NIAGA MEDAN)

Alum Simbolon, Catherine Aureulli Chandra

Abstract


Debt is a liability that arises through an agreement made between a debtor and a creditor. Debt is used as a basis for bankruptcy or for submitting a delay in payment of the debtor's debt. Summary Proof of Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) has actually been regulated in Article 8 paragraph (4) of Law Number 37 of 2004 and strengthened by Supreme Court Decision (MA) No.109/KMA/SK/IV/2020 concerning "Enforcement of the Handbook for Settlement of Bankruptcy Cases and PKPU". Summary Proof can be a reference for the Panel of Judges in granting PKPU applications by debtors or creditors to the Commercial Court. The PKPU application submitted through Decision Number 7/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga was rejected by the Panel of Judges because the Panel of Judges considered that the non-fulfillment of the 'simple debt' requirement that had to be fulfilled was one of the burdens of proof in the application for PKPU.


Keywords


Debt; Summary Proof; Postponement



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/lr.v22i3.6908

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books

Hartini, Rahayu. Hukum Kepailitan. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah, 2017.

Ivida, Demi Amrih. Hukum Kepailitan Kepastian Karakteristik Renvoi Prosedur Dalam Perkara Kepailitan. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Justitia, 2020.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Indografika, 2017

Mulyadi, Kartini. Pedoman Menangani Kepailitan. Depok: Rajawali, 2005.

Munawir, Analisa Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2004.

Remy S, Sutan. Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan. Jakarta: Grafiti, 2010.

Sjahdeini, Sutan. Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan. Surabaya: Kencana, 2016.

Suci, Ivida & Poesoko, H. Hukum Kepailitan. Yogyakarta : Laksbang Pressindo, 2014.

Journal Articles

Aprita, Serlika. "Meluruskan Logika Pemerintah Soal Kegentingan Moratorium UU Kepailitan dan PKPU." 'ADALAH 6, no. 6 (2022): 11-27, https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v6i6.27582.

Bhagawanthi Pemayun, Cok Istri, and I Ketut Westra. "Kewenangan Kurator Dalam Pemberesan Aset Debitor Pailit yang Berupa Saham Pada Perseroan Terbatas." Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 8 (2020): 1180-90, https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2020.v08.i08.p06.

Harsono, Ivan, and Paramita Prananingtyas. "Analisis Terhadap Perdamaian Dalam PKPU dan Pembatalan Perdamaian Pada Kasus Kepailitan PT Njonja Meneer." Notarius 12, no. 2 (2019): 1067-88, https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v12i2.29154

Juliantini, Ni Nyoman, et.al."Prosedur Dan Akibat Hukum Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 3/PKPU/2010/PN.Niaga.Sby)." Jurnal Analogi Hukum 3, no.1 (2021): 101-5, https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.3.1.2021.101-105

Kertha, Wicara. “Pembuktian Sederhana dalam Perkara Kepailitan oleh Agen Sindikasi Kredit sebagai Pemohon Pailit.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no.3 (2018): 1-17.

Kheriah. "Independensi Pengurus Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) dalam Hukum Kepailitan." Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Riau 3, no. 2 (2013): 238-57.

Simaremare, Sumurung P., et.al. "Politik Hukum Jangka Waktu Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang di Indonesia." Jurnal Ius Constituendum 6, no. 1 (2021): 99-118, http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v6i1.2915


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Alum Simbolon, Catherine Aureulli Chandra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.