Pergeseran Standar Feminisme Dalam Pemilu AS: Studi Terhadap Postfeminisme di Kalangan Muda [The Shifting Feminist Standard in U.S. Elections: Studies on Postfeminism in Youth]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/verity.v9i18.770Trefwoorden:
feminism, binary gender, post-structuralist feminism, post-feminism, millenialsSamenvatting
Feminism firmly stands in the front line when it comes to the confrontation against injustice and oppression. Yet, feminism has become too exclusive for the subject of women and privileged for sub-groups like whites and middle-class, who stand as a whole category. By then, feminism is stuck in a time warp as it is unable to diminish the oppression of binary gender and its exclusive category. Under the framework of post-structuralist feminism theory, post-feminism is defined as a positive development of feminism that offers more comprehensive thinking. This research aims to identify the ideas of post-feminism and analyze how the shifting values of feminism towards post-feminism occur. Through interpretive methods, the researcher identified that post-feminism was about the deconstruction of the subject 'women' and inter-sectionalism. The millennial paradigm shifts in the United States allowed the creation of preferences that was diverse and unlimited to a specific gender perspective. Thus, the political preferences of feminists were not only limited to the assumption of women that should choose a female president. Therefore, supporters of the millennial wave phenomena of Bernie Sanders in the primary caucus of Democratic Party of US elections in 2016 became one of the reflections of the millennial post-feminism ideas.
Referenties
Brooks, A. (1997). Postfeminism: Feminism, cultural theory and cultural forms. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). (2016). Women presidential and vice presidential candidates: A selected list. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/levels_of_office/women-presidential-and-vice-presidential-candidates-selected-list
Foucault, M. (1980). Body/Power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 55-62). London: Harvester.Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth, England: Peregrine.
Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 109-133). London: Harvester.
Gamble, S. (2001). The Routledge companion to feminism and postfeminism. New York: Routledge.
Gaudiano, N. & Przybyia, H. (2016, January 14). Sanders a hit with millennial women. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/01/14/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-womenmillennials/78810110
Hansen, L. (2010). Ontologies, epistemologies, and methodologies. In L. J. Shepherd (Ed.), Gender matters in global politics: A feminist introduction to international relations (pp. 17-27). New York: Routledge
Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Institute for Women's Policy Research. (2015). Status of women in the states: Political participation full section. Retrieved from https://statusofwomendata.org/explore-the-data/political-participation/political-participation-full-section/
Krolokke, C. & Sorensen, A. (2006). Gender communication theories and analyses: From silence to performance. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233086
McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: Sage.
Mouffe, C. (1993). The return of the political. London: Verso.
Narayan, U. (1998). Essence of culture and a sense of history: A feminist critique of cultural essentialism. Hypatia, 13(2), 86-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01227.x
Ollstein, A. M. (2016). How Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton differ on Wall Street. Think Progress. Retrieved from https://thinkprogress.org/how-bernie-sanders-and-hillary-clinton-differ-on-wall-street-8c746b608db1/
Pew Research Center. (2015). Chapter 2: What makes a good leader, and does gender matter? Women and leadership. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/01/14/chapter-2-what-makes-a-good-leader-and-does-gender-matter/
Phillips, A. (2010). What’s wrong with essentialism? Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 11(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2010.9672755
Rappeport, A. (2016, February 7). Gloria Steinem and Madeleine Albright rebuke young women backing Bernie Sander. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/08/us/politics/gloria-steinem-madeleine-albright-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders.html?_r=0Sahadi, J. & Yelin, T. (2016). Hillary vs. Bernie: Their money... and yours. CNN. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/infographic/economy/hillary-clinton-vs-bernie-sanders/
Suwastini, N. K. A. (2013). Perkembangan feminisme barat dari abad kedelapan belas hingga postfeminisme:Sebuah Tinjauan Teoretis. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(1), 198-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v2i1.1408
Tasker, Y. & Negra, D. (2007). Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822390411
Tong, R. (2009). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Uwujaren, J. & Utt, J. (2015). Why our feminism must be intersectional (and 3 ways to practice it). Everyday Feminism. Retrieved from http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/01/why-our-feminism-must-be-intersectional/
Williams, D. L., Crittenden, V. L., Keo, T. & McCarty, P. (2012). The use of social media: An exploratory study of usage among digital natives. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(2), 127-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pa.1414
##submission.downloads##
Gepubliceerd
Nummer
Sectie
Licentie
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.