ANALYZING COLONIAL REMNANTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDONESIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (1950–1980)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/verity.v16i32.9099Keywords:
colonialism , postcolonial dependency , Economic development, indonesia , inequalityAbstract
The Global South has always been a running contributor to the global inequality index, becoming a threat to international stability and sustainability. In most cases, it is found that colonial dependency is one major factor that causes this hindrance in development, leading to inequality. In its journey to independence, Indonesia had undergone a strict economic system under Dutch colonialism, and further transitioned to two different governing systems before its reformation, producing different outcomes of economic policy management and spread of inequality. Thus, this research wishes to understand the differences of economic system governance between the Soekarno and Soeharto era, and whether they possess any remnants of colonial dependency integrated within them. The Dependency Theory is used in this research with the concepts of postcolonialism, development, and inequality embedded into the discussions. The data of this research is gathered through academic literature, utilizing a qualitative approach, and is conducted with a descriptive and historical comparative approach. This research finds that Dutch colonialism contributed a major role in how Indonesia manages its economic strategies and how it impacts its high social and economic inequality. Further stretching to post-independence, it is found that Soekarno's decoupling of Western values translated worse into the economy, compared to Soeharto's Western-centric approaches to trade. The root causes of colonial dependencies and habits affect the outcome of economic habits, and thus contribute to the efficiencies of how Indonesia manages its economy during the period before reformation.References
Ahmadin. (2007). Masalah Agraria di Indonesia Masa Kolonial. Attoriolong, 4(1), 55-70. Retrieved from http://eprints.unm.ac.id/3911/1/Ahmadin_ATTORIOLONG_JANUARI%202007_55-70.pdf.
Arief, R.L. (2008). The Effects of Growth and Change in Inequality on Poverty Reduction in Indonesia.
Booth, A. (2016). Economic Change in Modern Indonesia: Colonial and Post-colonial Comparisons. Cambridge University Press.
de Zwart, P. (2021). Inequality in late colonial Indonesia: new evidence on regional differences. Cliometrica, 16(1), 175-211. doi: 10.1007/s11698-020-00220-3.
Dell, M., & Olken, B. A. (2019). The development effects of the extractive Colonial Economy: The Dutch Cultivation System in Java. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(1), 164–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz017.
Dos Santos, T. (1970). The Structure of Dependence. The American Economic Review, 60(2), 231-236. Retrieved from http://digamo.free.fr/dosantos70.pdf.
Fahmy, N. (2022). Changing the Global Culture. Horizons: Journal Of International Relations And Sustainable Development, 21, 238-249. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/48686713.
Fakih, F. (2020). Economic Policymaking in the Guided Democracy (1962–1965). Authoritarian Modernization In Indonesia’s Early Independence Period, 233-259. doi: 10.1163/9789004437722_009.
Fanon, F. (1967). A Dying Colonialism (H. Chevalier, Trans.). Grove Press.
Fanon, F. (1986). Black Skin, White Masks (Pluto Classics) (C. L. Markmann, Trans.). Pluto Press.
Farny, E. (2016). Dependency Theory: A Useful Tool for Analyzing Global Inequalities Today? Retrieved 1 October 2022, from https://www.e-ir.info/2016/11/23/dependency-theory-a-useful-tool-for-analyzing-global-inequalities-today/.
Fasseur, C. (1986). The Cultivation System and its Impact on the Dutch Colonial Economy and the Indigenous Society in Nineteenth-Century Java. In Springer eBooks (pp. 137–154). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4366-7_7.
Govind, Y. (2020). Post-Colonial Trends of Income Inequality: Evidence from the Overseas Departments of France. In World Inequality Lab. Retrieved November 26, 2024, from http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Govind2018.pdf.
Haddour, A. (2019). Frantz Fanon, postcolonialism and the ethics of difference. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526140814.
Head, K., Mayer, T., & Ries, J. (2010). The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics, 81(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.01.002.
Herath, D. (2008). Development Discourse of the Globalists and Dependency Theorists: do the globalisation theorists rephrase and reword the central concepts of the dependency school? Third World Quarterly, 29(4), 819-834. doi: 10.1080/01436590802052961.
Hoffman, B., Rodrick-Jones, E., & Thee, K. W. (2004, May 1). Indonesia: Rapid Growth, Weak Institutions. World Bank Group. Retrieved October Sunday, 2022, from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/576941468774895009/Indonesia-rapid-growth-weak-institutions.
Hopper, P. (2018). Understanding Development (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Huillery, E. (2009). History Matters: The Long-Term Impact of Colonial Public Investments in French West Africa. American Economic Journal Applied Economics, 1(2), 176–215. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.1.2.176.
Kroeze, R. (2021). Colonial Normativity? Corruption in the Dutch–Indonesian Relationship in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. In: Kroeze, R., Dalmau, P., Monier, F. (eds) Corruption, Empire and Colonialism in the Modern Era. Palgrave Studies in Comparative Global History. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0255-9_7.
Lindblad, J., Ochsendorf, F., & van de Water, M. (2013). Foreign investment and Dutch colonialism: Case studies from Indonesia. Analytical Approaches To The Economic And Social History Of Southeast Asia Since The Mid-19th Century, 1-33. Retrieved from https://www.colonialbusinessindonesia.nl/en/publications.
Locher-Scholten, E. (1994). Dutch Expansion in the Indonesian Archipelago around 1900 and the Imperialism Debate. Journal Of Southeast Asian Studies, 25(1), 91-111. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20071619.
Luthfi, A. (2015). Jan Breman (2014), Keuntungan kolonial dari kerja paksa; Sistem Priangan dari tanam paksa kopi di Jawa, 1720-1870. Wacana, Journal Of The Humanities Of Indonesia, 16(1), 238. doi: 10.17510/wjhi.v16i1.376.
Mahoney, J. (2010). Colonialism and postcolonial development: Spanish America in comparative perspective. Choice Reviews Online, 47(12), 47–7037. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-7037.
Markley, R. (2003). Riches, power, trade and religion: the Far East and the English imagination, 1600-1720. Renaissance Studies, 17(3), 494-516. doi: 10.1111/1477-4658.t01-1-00033.
McCormack, B. (1999). Fifty Years of lndonesian Development: 'One Nation,' Under Capitalism. Journal of World-Systems Research, 5, 48-73.
McVey, Ruth (1982). `The Beamtenstaat in Indonesia' in Ben Anderson and Audrey Kahin (eds). Interpreting Indonesian Politics: Thirteen Contributions to the Debate, Ithaca, 84-92.
Nair, S. (2018, August 5). Introducing Postcolonialism in International Relations Theory. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2017/12/08/postcolonialism-in-international-relations-theory/.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2013). Coloniality of power in Postcolonial Africa. Myths of decolonization. https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/dsp01bz60d006g/1/0-Coloniality_of_Power_Ndlovu_Prelim.pdf.
O'Neill, A. (2022). Population of Indonesia 1800-2020 | Statista. Retrieved 1 October 2022, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1066929/population-indonesia-historical/.
Owens, E. (1987). The Future of Freedom in the Developing World: Economic Development as Political Reform. Pergamon Press.
Oyetunde, O. (2022). Is Dependency Theory Relevant in the Twenty-First Century? E-International Relations. Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/2022/08/17/is-dependency-theory-relevant-in-the-twenty-first-century/.
Robinson, R. (2009). Indonesia: Rise of Capital (1st ed.). Equinox Publishing (Asia).
Salem, S. (2018). Reading Egypt’s Postcolonial State through Frantz Fanon: Hegemony, Dependency and Development. Interventions, 20(3), 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801x.2017.1421041.
Seers, D. (2010). Development Theory: Four Critical Studies. Taylor & Francis.
Siregar, I. F. (2023). The controversy of the cultivation system in Indonesia. Paramita Historical Studies Journal, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v33i1.38127.
Tampubolon, M., Tobing, G., & Wahyuningtyas, W. (2022). Human Enslavement: Indonesians' Encounter During Dutch Colonization. Asian Journal Of Research In Education And Social Sciences, 4(1), 44-52. doi: 10.55057/ajress.2022.4.1.6.
Tricahyono, D. (2020). Buruh Dalam Sejarah Indonesia: Studi Tentang Aktivitas Buruh Pada Masa Pemerintah Kolonial Belanda Periode 1870-1942. ISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sejarah, 16(2), 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/istoria.v16i2.35500.
Wardhana, D. (2020). Inequality in Indonesia: Kuznets waves or Kuznets Curve? Bappenas Working Papers, 3(2), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v3i2.67.
White, N. (2017). The Settlement of Decolonization and Post-Colonial Economic Development. Bijdragen Tot De Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal Of The Humanities And Social Sciences Of Southeast Asia, 173(2-3), 208-241. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17302003.
Widodo, T. (2006). From Dutch Mercantilism to Liberalism: Indonesian Historical Perspective. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 21(4), 323–343. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jieb/article/view/39915/22488.
Wiharyanto, A. (2015). Masa Kolonial Belanda 1800-1825. Retrieved from http://eprints.dinus.ac.id/14367/1/[Materi]_A._Kardiyat_Wiharyanto_-_MASA_KOLONIAL_BELANDA.pdf.
Wijanarko, R., & Saeng, V. (2022). Human beings and social structure in Frantz Fanon’s philosophical thought. Jurnal Filsafat, 32(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.66631.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Chrystle Feodore Manlee, Fransisca Elvanty Kurniawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.