Cultural Rights: A Bridge to Cosmopolitan Culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/verity.v17i34.10699Keywords:
culture, cultural rights, cosmopolitan culture, human rightsAbstract
This paper examines the conceptual foundations of cultural rights by situating them within the evolving understanding of culture and the broader human rights discourse. Drawing from contemporary scholarship, the analysis demonstrates that culture has shifted from a static, group-bound notion toward a fluid, meaning-making process, a shift that significantly influences how cultural rights are theorized and justified. The paper identifies key strengths of cultural rights, including their ability to prevent human rights violations, protect minority communities from both forced assimilation and cultural oppression, preserve cultural diversity, and foster conditions for peaceful coexistence. At the same time, the paper highlights several conceptual limitations, such as the risks of cultural relativism, the instrumentalization of cultural rights by states, and the homogenizing pressures of globalization. By bringing these strengths and limitations into conversation with theories of cosmopolitanism, the paper argues that cultural rights have the potential to act as a bridge toward cosmopolitan culture—one characterized by mutual recognition, dialogue, and respect for diversity. Ultimately, this study suggests that while cultural rights are imperfect, their continued development and thoughtful implementation could meaningfully contribute to a more inclusive and globally connected cultural sphere.
References
Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2012). Complicating the concept of culture. Comparative Education, 48(4), 441–454.
Barry, C. (2019). Hierarchy and diversity in Thailand’s changing political landscape. Situations, 12(1), 67–85.
Chow, P. Y. S. (2014). Culture as collective memories: An emerging concept in international law and discourse on cultural rights. Human Rights Law Review, 14(4), 611–646.
Côté, I., Grant, J. A., Islam, A., McLean, V., Mitchell, M. I., & Panagos, D. (2025). The global implementation of UNDRIP: A thematic review. The International Journal of Human Rights, 29(2), 306–330.
Delanty, G. (2011). Cultural diversity, democracy and the prospects of cosmopolitanism: A theory of cultural encounters. The British Journal of Sociology, 62(4), 633–656.
Delanty, G. (2008). The cosmopolitan imagination. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 82–83, 217–230.
Hamelink, C. F. (2003). Cultural rights in the global village. In A. Goonasekera et al. (Eds.), Cultural rights in a global world (pp. 7–25). Eastern Universities Press.
Logan, W. (2012). Cultural diversity, cultural heritage and human rights: Towards heritage management as human rights-based cultural practice. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(3), 231–244.
Pasamonk, B. (2004). The paradoxes of tolerance. The Social Studies, 95(5), 206–210.
Pascual, J. (2018). Cultural rights, local cultural policies, and sustainable development: Constructing a coherent narrative. Journal of Law, Social Justice & Global Development, 22, 1–12.
Ramsbotham, O. (2005). The analysis of protracted social conflict: A tribute to Edward Azar. Review of International Studies, 31, 109–126.
Rourke, J. T. (2008). International politics on the world stage (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Stamatopoulou, E. (2012). Monitoring cultural human rights: The claims of culture on human rights and the response of cultural rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 34(4), 1170–1192.
World Heritage Convention. (n.d.-a). About World Heritage. https://whc.unesco.org/en/about/
World Heritage Convention. (n.d.-b). World Heritage list. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/
Yúdice, G. (2009). Cultural diversity and cultural rights. Hispanic Issues On Line, 5(1), 110–137.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elyzabeth Bonethe Nasution
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
Department of 