Makna Strategis Kajian Wilayah Asia Tenggara dari Sudut Pandang Hubungan International [The Significance of Southeast Asian Regional Studies in International Relations]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/verity.v10i20.1460Schlagworte:
Southeast Asian Studies, International Relations, constructivism, construction of knowledgeAbstract
Although the promotion of Southeast Asian Studies is one of the main objectives in the establishment of ASEAN, most major works of Southeast Asian Studies that define this region emerge outside of Southeast Asia. From an international relations perspective, particularly constructivism, identity and knowledge construction have strategic meaning. By reviewing the literature, this paper will (i) explain what Southeast Asian Studies is as an academic field, and (ii) analyze the strategic meaning of Southeast Asian Studies from an International Relations perspective.
BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRAK: Walaupun pengembangan Kajian Wilayah Asia Tenggara menjadi salah satu tujuan didirikannya ASEAN pada tahun 1967, kebanyakan karya utama original yang mendefinisikan dan menjelaskan kawasan Asia Tenggara justru dihasilkan dari luar kawasan ini. Dari sudut pandang hubungan internasional, khususnya konstruktivisme, identitas dan pembentukan pengetahuan mengenai identitas tersebut memiliki makna strategis. Dengan menggunakan metode studi pustaka dan analisis wacana, makalah ini akan (i) menjelaskan apa sebenarnya kajian Asia Tenggara tersebut dengan menggunakan beberapa contoh karya yang terkait isu maritim Asia Tenggara, (ii) membahas kendala pengembangan Kajian Wilayah Asia Tenggara di kawasan ini, (iii) menganalisis arti strategis pengembangan Kajian Wilayah Asia Tenggara dari sudut pandang Hubungan Internasional, dan (iv) menyarankan beberapa langkah praktis pengembangan ilmu ini untuk Indonesia.
Literaturhinweise
Acharya, A. (2012). The making of Southeast Asia: International relations of a region. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Berger, P. (1966). Identity as a problem in the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Sociology, 7(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975600001351
Chou, C., & Houben, V. (2006). Southeast Asian studies: Debates and new directions. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812306517-02
Deutsch, K. W. (1957). Political community and the North Atlantic area: International organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Duroselle, J. B. (1952). Area studies: Problems of method. International Social Science Bulletin, 4(4), 636-646. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000059694
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
Hall, S. (Ed.). (2003). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London, England: SAGE Publications.
Jackson, J., & Sorensen, G. (2006). Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Khudi, A. F., & Anugrah, I. Kajian Asia Tenggara: Antara narasi, teori, dan emansipasi. Jurnal Kajian Wilayah, 4(2), 205-228. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/6229130/Kajian_Asia_Tenggara_Antara_Narasi_Teori_dan_ Emansipasi
Morgenthau, H. J. (1952). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
Nye, J. S. (2009). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
McVey, R. (1995). Change and continuity in Southeast Asian studies. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463400010432
Russet, B.M. (1967). International regions and the international system: A study in political ecology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300027764
Winichakul, T. (2014). Asian studies across academies. The Journal of Asian Studies, 73(4), 879-897. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021911814001065
Woo, P. S., & King, V. T. (2013). The historical construction of Southeast Asian studies: Korea and beyond. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814414593-009
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
