The Position of Collateral Assets Owned by Third Parties in the Management and Administration of Bankruptcy Assets

Authors

  • Rufina Astuti Sitanggang Faculty of Law Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Udin Silalahi Faculty of Law Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Jamin Ginting Faculty of Law Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v5i2.8746

Keywords:

Bankruptcy Estate, Collateral Assets Owned by Third Parties, Dualism

Abstract

Collateral serves as a guarantee for debt, with third parties often acting as guarantors or providing collateral that is not the debtor’s asset. When debtors file for bankruptcy, they may include third-party assets as collateral. The issue arises when these third-party assets are listed as bankruptcy assets, leading to conflicting court decisions—some include them as part of bankruptcy assets, while others do not. This dualism undermines legal certainty. The purpose of this research is to analyse the regulation regarding the position of collateral assets belonging to third parties in the management and administration of bankruptcy assets in Indonesia; the application of arrangements regarding collateral assets owned by third parties in the management and administration of bankruptcy assets in Indonesia; and legal certainty regulated over collateral assets belonging to third parties in bankruptcy in Indonesia. This research uses normative-juridical research with a statutory and conceptual approach with the analytical tools of agreement theory, legal certainty theory, and legal protection theory. Regulations regarding these issues are contained in Article 21 of Law Number 37 of 2004 and the guarantee agreement as an accessory agreement, Law Number 4 of 1996, Law Number 42 of 1999 and Book II and Book III of the Civil Code. The application of collateral payments owned by third parties in Indonesia's bankruptcy assets management and administration is currently has dualism. Pointing out that there are decisions that either declare collateral assets as bankruptcy assets or not, based on allegations and suspicions about ownership and the intention to accelerate the management and administration process. To address this, Article 21 of Law Number 37 of 2004 should be amended to clarify that bankruptcy assets are the assets of the bankrupt debtor and that collateral assets belonging to third parties are not included in bankruptcy assets as an affirmation of the previous provision.

References

Ahmaturrahman. Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Indralaya: Universitas Sriwijaya, 2020.

Ali, Achmad. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Undang-Undang (Legisprudence), Volume I Pemahaman Awal. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017.

Annisya Dwi Rahmayani Putri, and Lina Jamilah. “Perjanjian Jaminan Personal Guarantee dalam Terwujudnya Kepastian Hukum.” Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies 3, no. 1 (2023): 552–558. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v3i1.5050.

Asnawi, Muhammad Natsir, and Edi Hudiata. “Delimitation of Freedom of Contract Principle and Judge’S Corrective Function in Assessing the Parties’ Positions on an Agreement.” Mimbar Hukum 29, no. 1 (2017): 150–160. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16889.

Basri, Hasan, and Ahmad Redi. “Moral Responsibility of Curators in the Liquidation of State-Owned Legal Entity Companies.” Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health 3, no. 7 (2024): 1431–1443. https://ajesh.ph/index.php/gp/article/view/363/476.

Christy, Evie, Wilsen Wilsen, and Dewi Rumaisa. “Kepastian Hukum Hak Preferensi Pemegang Hak Tanggungan dalam Kasus Kepailitan.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 22, no. 2 (2020): 323–344. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v22i2.14909.

Gautama, Sudargo. Komentar atas Peraturan Kepailitan Baru untuk Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1998.

Handriani, Aan. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.” Pamulang Law Review 2, no. 2 (2020): 141–150. https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v2i2.5434.

Indonesian Civil Code.

Khalid. “Tanggung Jawab Penjamin (Borg) yang Menandatangani Akta Pengakuan Hutang Dengan Memakai Jaminan.” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 8, no. 1 (2023): 458–470. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i1.11241.

Khisni, Lila Kurniawati, and Lathifah Hanim. “Implementasi Asas Droit De Preference Terhadap Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Oleh Pihak Perbankan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit.” Jurnal Akta 4, no. 1 (2017): 97–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i1.1750.

Maknuun, Umu Luluk Atin Lu’lu’il, and Moch. Ichiyak Ulumudin. “Implementasi Prinsip 6C; Pembiayaan Griya dan Tingkat Pengembalian Angsuran Pada Bank Syariah Mandiri.” Jurnal At-Tamwil: Kajian Ekonomi Syariah 4, no. 1 (2022): 38–66. https://doi.org/10.33367/at-tamwil.v4i1.2527.

Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.

Muis, Irfan Ferdiansyah, Isis Ikhwansyah, and Tri Handayani. “Kedudukan Kreditur Separatis Terkait Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Yang Masuk Dalam Boedel Pailit Debitur.” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran 3, no. 2 (2022): 277–288. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v3i2.784.

Nating, Imran. Peranan dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.

Pramono, Nindyo. Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2023.

Porta, Rafael La, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. "Investor Protection and Corporate Governance." Journal of Financial Economics 58, no. 1-2 (2000): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-9.

Respationo, HM. Soerya, and M. Guntur Hamzah. “Putusan Hakim: Menuju Rasionalitas Hukum Refleksif Dalam Penegakan Hukum.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (2013): 101–107. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v2i2.10194.

Subhan, M. Hadi. “Insolvency Test: Melindungi Perusahaan Solven yang Beritikad Baik dari Penyalahgunaan Kepailitan.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 33, no. 1 (2014): 11–20. https://repository.unair.ac.id/100362/.

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

Slamet, Sri Redjeki. “Perlindungan Hukum dan Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis dalam Hal Terjadi Kepailitan terhadap Debitor.” Forum Ilmiah 13, no. 1 (2016): 52–59. https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Formil/article/view/1394.

Subhan, M. Hadi. Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

Suyanto, M. Multimedia Alat untuk Meningkatkan Keunggulan Bersaing. Jakarta: Andi, 2012.

Syahmin, Fidelia, and Dedeng. Hukum Perjanjian Internasional. Palembang: UPT Penerbit dan Percetakan Universitas Sriwijaya (Unsri Press), 2019.

Tejaningsih, Titik. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Separatis dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2016.

Wahyuni, Sri, and Rifki Khoirudin. Pengantar Manajemen Aset. Makassar: Nas Media Pustaka, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Sitanggang, R. A., Silalahi, U., & Ginting, J. (2025). The Position of Collateral Assets Owned by Third Parties in the Management and Administration of Bankruptcy Assets. Global Legal Review, 5(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v5i2.8746

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.