Analisis Penerapan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Dalam Menangani Praktik Monopoli di Indonesia
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
Competition Law, Monopoly Practices, KPPU, European UnionΠερίληψη
Competition law serves as a crucial pillar in maintaining a fair, efficient, and sustainable market. In Indonesia, this is regulated by Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.[1] This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the law’s implementation in addressing monopolistic practices by major enterprises. Using a normative juridical approach and case study analysis, the paper explores the national legal framework, institutional performance of the Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU), and compares it with international practices, particularly those of the European Union. The findings indicate that while the legal foundation exists, structural limitations, regulatory inconsistencies, and low legal awareness among business actors hinder its enforcement. The study recommends legal reform, increased institutional capacity, and stronger inter-agency coordination to promote a competitive and just business environment.
[1] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.
Αναφορές
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Lembaran Negara Tahun 1999 Nomor 33, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 3817.
Putusan Pengadilan
Putusan Nomor 15/KPPU-I/2019. 2019. https://putusan.kppu.go.id/
Jurnal Ilmiah
Kholis, Nur. “Urgensi Penegakan Hukum dan Penguatan Peran Pengawasan KPPU di Era Industri Digital.” Cendekia Niaga 8, no. 1 (Juli 2024): 40–56. https://jurnal.kemendag.go.id/index.php/JCN/article/view/899.
Sengge, Anhar, Sudirman, dan Wahyudi Umar. “Pengawasan dan Penegakan Hukum E-Commerce oleh KPPU dalam Mengatasi Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 5, no. 4 (November 2024): 7–20. https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/604.
Sonia, Sinta, dan Made Aditya Pramana. “Penegakan Hukum dalam Persaingan Bisnis Online (E-Commerce) di Indonesia.” Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum 11, no. 5 (Juli 2022): 1150–1165. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/85345.
Wibisana, Andri. “Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 13, no. 33 (Agustus 2006): 147–164. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol13.iss33.art8.
Fajar Sugianto, Yuber Lago, Laurenzia Luna. “STATE LAW, INTEGRAL ECONOMIC JUSTICE, AND BETTER REGULATORY PRACTICES: PROMOTING ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY IN INDONESIA.” Global Legal Review 3, no. 2 (2023): 91–108.
Indradewi, Astrid Athina, and Fajar Sugianto. “Peran Dan Manfaat Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Pelaku Usaha.” Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik 2, no. 2 SE-Articles (February 13, 2024): 85–95. https://ifrelresearch.org/index.php/jhsp-widyakarya/article/view/2798.
Kongres, Evi, Fajar Sugianto, Erny Herlin Setyorini, Bariyima Sylvester Kokpan, and Sheng Zhang. “Protecting Consumers Against Defamation Claims: The Role of Common Interest in Product Reviews.” Khazanah Hukum 6, no. 3 (2024): 294–310.
Sugianto, Fajar. “ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CONTRACT LAW : HOW THE EYES OF ECONOMICS WORK WHILE DELIVERING JUSTICE WITH UNPREJUDICED HANDS OF EXISTING INDONESIAN CONTRACT LAW
Sugianto, Fajar. Common Dimensions of Law and Economics in Contract Law.” Journal of International T 11, no. 1 (2025): 51–60. https://www.jital.org/index.php/jital/article/view/555/pdf_295.
Sugianto, Fajar. “Efisiensi Ekonomi Sebagai Remedy Hukum.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2014): 61–72.
Sugianto, Fajar; Indradewi A, Astrid; Valencia, Claresta Devina. “BETWEEN VALUATION AND MONETIZATION OF EFFICIENCY IN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW : IS IT POSSIBLE ?” Journal of International Trade, Logistics and Law 10, no. 1 (2024): 286–294.
Sugianto, Fajar, Stevinell Mildova, and Felicia Christina Simeon. “Increasing Economic Performance Through the Rule of Law in Indonesia: Law and Economics Perspective.” Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 140, no. International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020) (2020): 92–99.
Sugianto, Fajar, Ellora Sukardi, and Tomy Michael. “Comparison of Legal Consumer Protection Systems in E-Commerce Transactions To Support Digital Economic Growth in Indonesia.” Dalat University Journal of Science 12, no. 1 (2021): 39–51.
Laporan Hasil Penelitian / Laporan Tahunan
Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. Laporan Tahunan KPPU 2022. Jakarta: KPPU, 2022. https://www.kppu.go.id/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Competition Law and Policy Review: Indonesia 2019. Paris: OECD, 2019. https://www.oecd.org/competition/oecd-review-indonesia.htm
Media Internet
European Commission. “Antitrust: Commission Fines Google €2.42 Billion for Abusing Dominance as Search Engine.” European Commission, 27 Juni 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_1784
Gandhi, Gusti Putu N. dan Viyoneta Purnama. “Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Butuh Diatur Undang-Undang Baru.” Hukumonline, 12 Oktober 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/monopoli-dan-persaingan-usaha-tidak-sehat-butuh-diatur-undang-undang-baru-lt6527b0cfcd012/
Λήψεις
Δημοσιευμένα
Πώς να δημιουργήσετε Αναφορές
Τεύχος
Ενότητα
Άδεια
Πνευματική ιδιοκτησία (c) 2025 Frederich Gunawan
Αυτή η εργασία είναι αδειοδοτημένη υπό το CC Αναφορά Δημιουργού 4.0.
