Analisis Pengaturan Hukum Pasar Modal terhadap Pelanggaran Investasi oleh Dana Pensiun Pertamina: Studi Kasus Saham PT Sugih Energy TBK
Schlagworte:
capital market, pension fund, violation of law, investmentAbstract
The case of the purchase of shares of PT Sugih Energy Tbk. (SUGI) by the Pertamina Pension Fund shows the weak investment governance of Indonesian state financial institutions. There were transactions amounting to hundreds of billions of rupiah carried out without internal approval and outside the official system, resulting in large losses and administrative fines. This article aims to analyze the legal perspective, with an emphasis on the legal review of procedural violations and the resulting criminal and administrative responsibilities. The method used is a normative approach with case studies and regulations of the Capital Market Law and the Corruption Law. The results of the study show that there was abuse of authority that clearly violated the principle of prudence in investment. Law enforcement in this case is a reminder that managing public funds is not only about profit, but also legal and ethical responsibility.
Literaturhinweise
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 Pasar Modal
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Buku
Mishkin, Frederic S. The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2015.
OECD. OECD guidelines on corporate governance of state-owned enterprises. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264244160-en
Tandelilin, Eduardus. Portofolio dan Investasi: Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2010.
Jurnal Hasil Penelitian
Arifin, Zainal. “Kerugian Dana Pensiun dan Kegagalan Regulasi Investasi: Studi Yuridis-Empiris.” Jurnal Hukum & Keuangan Publik 6, no. 1 (2021): 45–61.
Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, no. 4 (1976): 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Fabian Jonathan, Fajar Sugianto, and Tomy Michael. “Comparative Legal Analysis on the Competence of the Indonesia’S Financial Services Authority and Monetary Authority of Singapore on the Enforcement of Insider Trading Laws.” Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions 2, no. 2 (2023): 283–300. https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v2i2.24.
Fajar Sugianto, Yuber Lago, Laurenzia Luna. “STATE LAW, INTEGRAL ECONOMIC JUSTICE, AND BETTER REGULATORY PRACTICES: PROMOTING ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY IN INDONESIA.” Global Legal Review 3, no. 2 (2023): 91–108. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/glr.v3i2.6552.
Sugianto, Fajar. “Efisiensi Ekonomi Sebagai Remedy Hukum.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2014): 61–72. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2014.v8.i1.p61-72.
Waluyo, Herlina, Irene Putri A.S.Sinaga, and Fajar Sugianto. “Perlindungan Hukum Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Penyelenggara Layanan Urun Dana Berbasis Efek Berdasarkan POJK Nomor 16/POJK.04/2021.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 18, no. 2 (2022): 131–46. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v0i0.6241.
Putusan Pengadilan
Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 65/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Jkt.Pst.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2025 Almando Davin Nepa Bait, Bintang Natanael, Owen Gavriel Suherman
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
