Analisis Yuridis Merger antara Gojek dan Tokopedia (GoTo) dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia

Authors

  • Catrina Yuka Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Mirelle Elicia Perera Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Shabrina Aurellia Nafisah Desuardi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan

Keywords:

Mergers, Competition Law, Digital Economy

Abstract

The development of the digital economy in Indonesia has encouraged various technology companies to carry out business strategies, one of which is a merger. The merger between Gojek and Tokopedia in May 2021 formed a new entity called GoTo. The purpose of this study is to analyze the GoTo merger from the perspective of business competition law in Indonesia, to find out whether the merger of the two largest startup companies in Indonesia has the potential to cause monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, as well as an analysis of the results of the assessment of the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition (KPPU). The results showed that the GoTo merger did not violate the provisions of business competition law. This is based on the fact that Gojek and Tokopedia operate in different markets, do not have the potential to change the market structure, and do not create entry barriers for other business actors. In addition, KPPU stated that there is no potential for monopolistic practices or unfair business competition in the GoTo merger. This merger is considered to strengthen regional competitiveness in the midst of competition with global companies. Therefore, the GoTo merger can be viewed as a strategic step that is legally valid and supports the growth of a healthy and competitive digital economy in Indonesia.

References

Ahmad, & Anna. (2024, Mei). Qua Vadis Penggabungan Tokopedia dan Gojek di Era Ekonomi Digital? 2. 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19818

Burhan, F. A. (2021, September 22). "KPPU Butuh Waktu Kaji Merger Gojek - Tokopedia karena Nilainya Besar". https://katadata.co.id/digital/startup/614abb7b677d9/kppu-butuh-waktu-kaji-merger-gojek-tokopedia-karena-nilainya-besar

Daga, A., & Potkin, F. (2021, May 17). Indonesia's Gojek, Tokopedia to create biggest local tech group. https://www.reuters.com/technology/indonesias-gojek-tokopedia-merge-countrys-biggest-deal-2021-05-17/

Dikky, KPPU Putuskan Merger Gojek-Tokopedia Tidak Melanggar Persaingan Usaha. ,https://industri.kontan.co.id/news/kppu-putuskan-merger-gojek-tokopedia-tidak-melanggar-persaingan-usaha

Fadhilah, N. ((2022)). Dominasi Pasar dan Tantangan UMKM Pasca Merger GoTo. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha. https://doi.org/10.5678/jpu.2022.04206.

Franedya, R. (2022, May 17). Gojek & Tokopedia Merger, Berapa Valuasinya Kini? https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20210517172107-37-246072/gojek-tokopedia-merger-berapa-valuasinya-kini

Kisah Perjalanan Tokopedia. (n.d.). Tokopedia. https://www.tokopedia.com/about/our-story

Lee, T., & Millward, S. (2015, August 27). This guy turned Go-Jek into Indonesia's hottest startup. Tech in Asia. https://www.techinasia.com/indonesia-go-jek-nadiem-makarim-profile

Mariana, H., & E, A. D. . Pakar Hukum UI Nilai Pembentukan GoTo Tidak Ciptakan Monopoli. https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/05/17/140300926/pakar-hukum-ui-nilai-pembentukan-goto-tidak-ciptakan-monopoli

Septiandy, D., & Hamim, N. (n.d.). Analisis Perkembangan Tokopedia Dan Gojek Pasca Merger Sebagai Goto Dan Kolaborasinya Dengan Tiktok Terhadap Perekonomian. 2, 16. https://doi.org/10.61132/lokawati.v2i2.632

Tentang Kami. (n.d.). GoTo. https://www.gotocompany.com/about-us

Undang-Undang No 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas

Wibisono, A., & Halim, M. ((2021)). Analisis Yuridis Dampak Merger Tokopedia dan Gojek terhadap Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Teknologi. https://doi.org/10.7890/jiht.2021.03205.

Fajar Sugianto, Yuber Lago, Laurenzia Luna. “STATE LAW, INTEGRAL ECONOMIC JUSTICE, AND BETTER REGULATORY PRACTICES: PROMOTING ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY IN INDONESIA.” Global Legal Review 3, no. 2 (2023): 91–108.

Kongres, Evi, Fajar Sugianto, Erny Herlin Setyorini, Bariyima Sylvester Kokpan, and Sheng Zhang. “Protecting Consumers Against Defamation Claims: The Role of Common Interest in Product Reviews.” Khazanah Hukum 6, no. 3 (2024): 294–310.

Sugianto, Fajar. “ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CONTRACT LAW : HOW THE EYES OF ECONOMICS WORK WHILE DELIVERING JUSTICE WITH UNPREJUDICED HANDS OF EXISTING INDONESIAN CONTRACT LAW Fajar SUGIANTO Keywords : 3 . Common Dimensions of Law and Economics in Contract Law.” Journal of International T 11, no. 1 (2025): 51–60. https://www.jital.org/index.php/jital/article/view/555/pdf_295.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-03

How to Cite

Yuka, C., Perera, M. E., & Desuardi, S. A. N. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Merger antara Gojek dan Tokopedia (GoTo) dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Anthology: Inside Intellectual Property Rights, 3(2), 530–542. Retrieved from https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/Anthology/article/view/10089

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.