OPTIMIZING SCAFFOLDING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS' WRITING ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION IN AN EFL CLASSROOM CONTEXT [MENGOPTIMALKAN SCAFFOLDING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MENULIS EKSPOSISI ANALITIS SISWA DALAM KONTEKS KELAS EFL]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/pji.v20i2.8139Keywords:
scaffolding, exposition writing, EFL, penulisan eksposisi analitis siswa, konteks kelas EFLAbstract
Abstract
The preliminary study of the present research showed that students faced problems in writing English analytical exposition text. Framed in classroom action research, this study aims to investigate how using scaffolding as a strategy in teaching writing can improve students' writing in analytical exposition text. This qualitative study employed document analysis and interviews to answer the research questions. The participants of this study were 26 EFL students in a senior high school in Bandung, and six students participated in interview sessions. The result indicated that the scaffolding process implemented in two action research cycles improved students' skills in writing analytical exposition text in all aspects of writing: content, organization, grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics. Besides, students also showed a positive perception toward implementing scaffolding through various activities in the classroom. This study recommends that scaffolding writing be applied using multiple online tools in more diverse educational settings since the rapid progress of information technology enables learners to acquire knowledge and improve skills online.
Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak
Studi pendahuluan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa siswa menghadapi masalah dalam menulis teks eksposisi analitis menggunakan bahasa Inggris. Dibingkai dalam penelitian tindakan kelas, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki bagaimana penggunaan scaffolding sebagai strategi dalam pengajaran menulis dapat meningkatkan kemampuan menulis siswa dalam teks eksposisi analitis. Penelitian kualitatif ini menggunakan analisis dokumen dan wawancara untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian. Partisipan dari penelitian ini adalah 26 siswa EFL di sebuah sekolah menengah atas di Bandung, dan enam siswa berpartisipasi dalam sesi wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses scaffolding yang diterapkan dalam dua siklus penelitian tindakan meningkatkan kemampuan siswa dalam menulis teks eksposisi analitis di semua aspek penulisan: konten, organisasi, tata bahasa, kosakata, dan mekanik. Selain itu, siswa juga menunjukkan persepsi yang positif terhadap penerapan scaffolding melalui berbagai kegiatan di kelas. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan agar penulisan scaffolding dapat diterapkan dengan menggunakan berbagai alat online dalam lingkungan pendidikan yang beragam karena kemajuan teknologi informasi yang pesat memungkinkan siswa untuk memperoleh pengetahuan dan meningkatkan keterampilan online.
References
Ahangari, S., Hejazi, M., & Razmjou, L. (2014). The impact of scaffolding on content retention of Iranian post-elementary EFL learners' summary writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.392
Ahn, H. (2012). Teaching writing skills based on a genre approach to L2 primary school students: An action research. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p2
Ariyanti, A., & Fitriana, R. (2017). EFL students' difficulties and needs in essay writing. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 158, 111-121. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-17.2017.4
Boblett, N. (2012). Scaffolding: Defining the metaphor. Teacher College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7916/salt.v12i2.1357
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. (1998). Scaffolding emergent writing in the zone of proximal development. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1-19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239592790_Scaffolding_Emergent_Writing_in_the_Zone_of_Proximal_Development
Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2014). Scaffolding collaborative reflective writing in a VET curriculum. Vocations and Learning, 7(2), 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-014-9110-3
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment principle and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Education.
Bruner, J., and Sherwoord, V. (1976). Peekaboo and the learning of rule structures. In J. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 277-87). New York: Basic Books.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Byrne, D. (1993). Teaching writing ability. New York: Longman Group Ltd.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics, quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Emilia, E. (2014). SFL Genre Pedagogy and Students Empowerment. The 61st TEFLIN International Conference, UNS Solo 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jels.v2i2.2239
Emilia, E., & Hamied, F. A. (2015). Systemic functional linguistic genre pedagogy (SFL GP) in a tertiary EFL writing context in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 26(2), 155 -182. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/155-182
Emilia, E. (2016). Pendekatan berbasis teks. Kiblat.
Fan, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2019). A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1-2), 159-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1660685
Faraj, A. K. A. (2015). Scaffolding EFL students' writing through the writing process approach. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(13), 131-142. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/22371
Gerot, L., and Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Queensland, NSW: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gonulal, T., & Loewen, S. (2018). Scaffolding technique. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0180
Gomez-Laich, M. P., Miller, R. T., & Pessoa, S. (2019). Scaffolding analytical argumentative writing in a design class: A corpus analysis of student writing. Linguistics and Education, 51, 20-30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.03.003
Hammond, J. (2001). Scaffolding and language. In scaffolding teaching and learning in language and literacy education. Newton, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Education Limited.
Hasan, J., & Marzuki, M. (2017). An Analysis of student's ability in writing at Riau University Pekanbaru. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(5), 380-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0705.08
Howell, E. (2018). Scaffolding multimodality: Writing process, collaboration and digital tools. English Teaching, 17(2), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-05-2017-0053
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Klehr, M. (2012). Qualitative teacher research and the complexity of classroom contexts, Theory into Practice, 51(2), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.662867
Klimova, B. (2020). An off-line scaffolding tool for writing abstracts of qualification papers. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 1271-1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.136
Ma, X., Jiang, X., Jia, Y., Wu, T., & Nie, Z. (2022). Research on scaffolding instruction strategies for English writing teaching of rural junior middle school students in China. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(3), 320-339. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.93.12061
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Nasser, S. M. (2019). Iraqi EFL students' difficulties in writing composition: An Experimental Study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 178-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n1p178
Nguyen, T. T. A., & Truong, V. (2024). The effects of scaffolding in genre-based writing instructions on EFL learners' writing performance. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.1.751
Nurlatifah, L., & Yusuf, F. N. (2022). Students' problems in writing analytical exposition text in EFL Classroom Context. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(3). http://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i3.6633
Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1
Rao, T. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal, 61(2), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm002
Rashtchi, M. (2019). Scaffolding argumentative essay writing via reader-response approach: a case study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0078-2
Riazi, A. M., & Rezaii, M. (2011). Teacher- and peer-scaffolding behaviors : Effects on EFL students' writing improvement. CLESOR 2010: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference for Community Languages and ESOL, 55-63. http://www.tesolanz.org.nz/
Shin, S., Brush, T. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2020). Examining the hard, peer, and teacher scaffolding framework in inquiry-based technology-enhanced learning environments: impact on academic achievement and group performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2423-2447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09763-8
Shooshtari, Z. G., & Mir, F. (2014). ZPD, tutor; peer scaffolding: Sociocultural theory in writing strategies application. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1771-1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.605
Suherdi, D. (2008). Scaffolding in Junior High School (SMP) English teaching learning processes. International Conference on Applied Linguistics 1. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Syarifah, E. F., & Gunawan, W. (2016). Scaffolding in the teaching of writing discussion texts based on SFL Genre-based Approach. English Review: Journal of English Education, 4(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v4i1.306
Veeramuthu Veerappan, W. H. (2011). The effect of scaffolding technique in journal writing among the second language learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 934-940. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.4.934-940
Vonna, Y., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The effect of scaffolding techniques on students' writing achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(1), 227-233. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jph
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668639
Yunus, M., Hashim, H., Pazilah, F. N., Rusadzeli, N. N., Bolkan, N. S. T., & Segakumaran, D. (2019). Scaffolding approach in teaching writing in English as a second language (ESL) context. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(6), 68-80. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol5iss6/5607_Yunus_2019_E_R.pdf
Zahedi, Y., & Abdi, M. (2012). The impact of imagery strategy on EFL learners' vocabulary learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 2264-2272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.197
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
