Comparison of 2009 and 2011 WHO Guidelines, and Scoring Models for Adult Hospitalized Dengue Infection: A Single Observation in Tangerang, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19166/med.v13i2.8104Keywords:
Dengue, WHO dengue diagnostic, Scoring modelAbstract
Background: World Health Organization (WHO) published a dengue guideline in 2009 and in 2011 by WHO-SEARO. However, many of dengue cases in early phase do not meet all the criteria by WHO classification. Because of this condition there is a scoring model that was published in 2015, that might help in primary health care. Therefore, a study to compare those diagnostic tools especially in adult dengue patients in Banten is needed.
Aims: This study is to know the comparison between 2009 version and 2011 version of dengue diagnostic guidelines by WHO and scoring model version.
Methods and Material: This study used a descriptive method with a cross-sectional design at 60 adult dengue patients. Each patient is grouped according to diagnostic tools’ classification and will be analyzed using Chi-square.
Results: Results are grouped according to the WHO diagnosis from 2009 and 2011, presumptive model and probable models where there are 46 (77%), 48 (78%), 31(52%), and 15 (25%) of patients diagnosed with dengue infection. Overall, the diagnosis made by the 2009 WHO and the probable models has the most superior sensitivity and specificity values of 84,6% and 25%, and 82,4% and 97,7% respectively compared to other diagnostic tools. However, from the results of positive predictive values, probable models have a higher percentage than the 2009 WHO diagnosis.
Conclusions: The probable model is more sensitive and specific than other diagnostic results. These conclude that probable model is best tool for dengue infection screening in early phase of infection.References
1. World Health Organization. Dengue. 2016. https://www.who.int/immunization/diseases/dengue/en/
2. Gubler DJ. Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998; 11(3):480-496. https://doi.org/10.1128%2Fcmr.11.3.480
3. World Health Organization. Promoting dengue vector surveillance and control. 2018. https://www.who.int/activities/promoting-dengue-vector-surveillance-and-control
4. World Health Organization. Dengue Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention, and Control. 2009. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241547871
5. World Health Organization Regional Office of South East Asia. Comprehensive Guidelines for Prevention and Control of Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic fever. 2011. https://www.aedescost.eu/sites/default/files/2023-01/WHO_SEA-Comprehensive_Guidelines_Prev%26Control_Dengue-2011.pdf
6. Kementrian Kesehatan RI. InfoDatin Situasi Demam Berdarah Dengue. 2018.
7. Hadinegoro S. The revised WHO dengue case classification: Does the system need to be modified? Paediatrics and International Child Heath. 2012; 32(SUPPl):33-38. https://doi.org/10.1179%2F2046904712Z.00000000052
8. Nujum Z, Thomas A, Vijayakumar K, Nair R, Pillai R, et al. Comparative performance of the probable case definitions of dengue by WHO (2009) and the WHO-SEAR expert group (2011). Pathogens and Global Health. 2014; 108(2):103-110. https://doi.org/10.1179%2F2047773214Y.0000000131
9. Cucunawangsih, Dewi BE, Sungono V, Lugito NPH, Sutrisna B, et al. Scoring Model to Predict Dengue Infection in the Early Phase of Illness in Primary Health Care Centre. iMedPub Journals. 2015;6(4):1-8.
10. Barniol J, Gaczkowski R, Barbato, Cunha R, Salgado D, et al. Usefulness and applicability of the revised dengue case classification by disease: multi- centre study in 18 countries. BMC Infectious Disease. 2011;11(106):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-106
11. Pothapregeda S, Sivapurapu V, Kamalakannan B, Thulasingham M. Validity and Usefulness of Revised WHO Guidelines in Children with Dengue Fever. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2018;12(5):SC01-SC05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/32021.11528
12. Kalayanarooj S. Dengue classification: current WHO vs the newly suggested classification for better clinical application?. Journal of Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2011;94 Suppl 3. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/dengue-classification-current-vs-newly-suggested-classification-better-clinical-application-1/
13. Van De Wed C, Van Gorp E, Supriatna M, Soemantri A, Osterhaus A, et al. Evaluation of the 2009 WHO Dengue Case Classification in an Indonesian Pediatric Cohort. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2012;86(1):166-170. https://doi.org/10.4269%2Fajtmh.2012.11-0491
14. Macedo GA, Gonin MLC, Pone SM, Cruz OG, Nobre FF, Brasil P. Sensitivity and specificity of the World Health Organization dengue classification schemes for severe dengue assessment in children in Rio de Janeiro. PloS ONE. 2014;9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096314
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website). The final published PDF should be used and bibliographic details that credit the publication in this journal should be included.
.png)
