Fair Value of Pancasila in the Framework of Criminal Code Renewal

Yuni Priskila Ginting, Franciscus Xaverius Wartoyo

Abstract


Pancasila is the ideological foundation of the Indonesian state that guarantees the unity and integrity of Indonesians entering the era of globalization. Current Indonesian criminal law is obsolete because it does not consider Indonesia's philosophical, sociological, and cultural values and does not follow the changing mindset of modern criminal law. Social policy must be woven into and placed in a carefully integrated social plan, especially to prevent unwanted access related to crime. Indonesian criminal law will continue to apply colonial values that are not based on Pancasila values. The codification of laws that live in society is regulated specifically for public awareness of the potential for the law that can be used as a reference for regional regulations. The basic idea of Pancasila's balance is based on the religious moral paradigm, the human paradigm, the nationality paradigm, the democracy and wisdom paradigm, and the social justice paradigm. Justice is an abstract value that must be realized in the form of legal norms to realize these values in social life without ignoring religious law, customary law, and Western law. This does not correspond to the value contained in Pancasila.


Keywords


Pancasila; Justice; Criminal Law Renewal



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/lr.v22i3.5974

Full Text:

PDF

References


Laws and Regulations

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

MPRS Decree No. XX/MPRS/1966 concerning DPR-GR Memorandum on the Source of the Laws of Indonesia and the Hierarchy of Indonesian Legislation.

MPR Decree No. V/MPR/1973 concerning the Review of MPRS Resolutions.

MPR Decree No. IX/MPR/1978 concerning the Need to Amend Article 3 of MPR Resolution number V/MPR/1973.

Law Number 1 Year 1946 concerning The Indonesia Criminal Code.

Books

Abdurahman. Aneka Masalah Hukum dalam Pembangunan di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1979.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. RUU KUHP Baru Sebuah Restrukturisasi/Rekonstruksi Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Semarang: Badan Penerbitan Universitas Diponegoro, 2012.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Tujuan & Pedoman Pemidanaan (Perspektif Pembaharuan & Perbandingan Hukum Pidana). Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2017.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Penguatan Sistem Pemerintahan Dan Peradilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. “Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi.” In Perspektif Baru tentang ‘Rule of Law and Rule of Ethics’ & Constitutional Law and Constitutional Ethichs’. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Ekaputra, Mohammad, dan Abul Khair. Sistem Pidana Di Dalam KUHP Dan Pengaturannya Menurut Konsep KUHP Baru. Medan: USU Press, 2010.

Nugroho, Sigit Sapto. Membumikan Hukum Pancasila Sebagai Basis Hukum Nasional Masa Depan. Solo: Iltizam, 2016.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu hukum. Diedit oleh Awaludin Marwan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.

Septiano, Muhammad Fajar. Pidana Kerja Sosial Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Penjara Jangka Pendek. Malang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, 2014.

Widnyana, I Made. Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Fikhati aneska, 2013.

Journal Articles

Aldyan, Arsyad, and Abhishek Negi. “The Model of Law Enforcement Based on Pancasila Justice.” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 2, no. 3 (2022): 178–90. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i3.51.

Arief, Hanafi, and Ningrum Ambarsari. “Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum 10, no. 2 (2018): 173–90. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v10i2.1362.

Astuti, Galuh Faradhilah Yuni. “Relevansi Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 10, no. 2 (2015): 195–214. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v10i2.4953.

Christianto, Hwian. “Pembaharuan Makna Asas Legalitas.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 39, no. 3 (19 Juli 2017): 347–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol39.no3.1512.

Fatoni, Syamsul. “Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Melalui Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Berorientasikan Pendekatan Religius.” Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 1 (2015): 41–64. https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2015.3.1.41-64.

Mandiana, Sari. “Konsepsi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Sebagai Sistem Normatif.” Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS 5, no. 2 (2016): 135–47. https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/prioris/article/view/559.

Marpaung, Ramsen, and Tristam Pascal Moeliono. “Perbandingan Hukum antara Prinsip Habeas Corpus dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Inggris dengan Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 5, no. 2 (2021): 224–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v5i2.494.

Najih, Mokhammad. “Indonesian Penal Policy: Toward Indonesian Criminal Law Reform Based on Pancasila.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 3, no. 2 (2018): 149–74. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v3i02.27510.

Nugroho, Iwan. “Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Sebagai Falsafah Pandangan Hidup Bangsa Untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Pembangunan Lingkungan Hidup.” Jurnal Konstitusi 3, no. 2 (2010): 107–28. http://publishing-widyagama.ac.id/ejournal-v2/index.php/jk/article/view/321.

Purnama, Panji, and Febby Mutiara Nelson. “Penerapan E-Court Perkara Pidana Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Terwujudnya Integrated Judiciary dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 10, no. 1 (2021): 97–116. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i1.661.

Shofiana, Gabrielia Febrianty. “Philosophy, Pancasila and modern technology.” Yuridika 29, no. 2 (2014): 139–48. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v29i2.363.

Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus, Putu Edgar Tanaya, and Bagus Hermanto. “Discover the legal concept in the sociological study.” Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 3, no. 1 (2020): 94–108. https://doi.org/10.33096/sjijl.v3i1.69.

Sugiharto, Gatot. “Relevansi Kebijakan Penetapan Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Novelty 7, no. 1 (2016): 83–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v7i3.a3936.

Wahyuningsih, Sri Endah. “Urgensi Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Materiel Indonesia Berdasarkan Nilai–Nilai Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 1, no. 1 (2014): 17–23. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/1457.

Yusdiyanto, Yusdiyanto. “Makna Filosofis Nilai-Nilai Sila Ke-Empat Pancasila Dalam Sistem Demokrasi Di Indonesia.” FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (2016): 221–412. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no2.623.

Thesis or Dissertations

Krisnan, Johny. “Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional.” Thesis, Universitas Dipenogoro, 2008. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/17989/

Website Content

Napitupulu, Erasmus A T, dan AKSM Genoveva. “Hukuman Tanpa Penjara: Pengaturan, Pelaksanaan, dan Proyeksi Alternatif Pemidanaan Non Pemenjaraan di Indonesia” Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR), 2019. https://icjr.or.id/hukuman-tanpa-penjara-pengaturan-pelaksanaan-dan-proyeksi-alternatif-pemidanaan-non-pemenjaraan-di-indonesia/.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Yuni Priskila Ginting, Franciscus Xaverius Wartoyo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.