PROSPEK KECERDASAN BUATAN SEBAGAI SUBJEK HUKUM PERDATA DI INDONESIA [Prospects of Artificial Intelligence As a Subject of Civil Law in Indonesia]

FL. Yudhi Priyo Amboro, Khusuf Komarhana

Abstract


AI is a technology that refers to the simulation of human intelligence programmed into an electronic medium to think and act like a human. It is necessary to know the status and position of artificial intelligence in law, especially in the civil field. It can be thought of as an object. But, AI moves autonomously like humans. Of course, this becomes a problem of identifying its status. This study will discuss on the existence of AI and its regulations, also the prospects for AI as legal subject of civil law in Indonesia. This is juridical-normative research with comparative law, legal history, and legislation approaches. The data used is secondary data. The qualitative method is used to analyze and describe the data descriptively. From the research results, it is known that AI is now growing, however it is still having many perspectives of regulations. The way of thinking on legal entity theory could be the measure to regulate the AI. AI can be seen as legal subject, but it will be a problem when AI cannot be held accountable independently. AI can be valued as an object; thus, AI will be attached to the responsibility of its owner. AI can also be considered as legal subject that has partial legal capacity as the doctrine of in loco parentis, which means it is judged as a child. Whatever the choice, it is time for Indonesia to have a legal concept to be the basis for regulations related to AI.

Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Kecerdasan buatan merupakan teknologi yang mengacu pada simulasi kecerdasan manusia yang diprogram ke dalam suatu media elektronik untuk berpikir layaknya manusia dan meniru tindakan manusia. Karenanya perlu diketahui status dan kedudukan kecerdasan buatan di dalam hukum, terutama dalam bidang perdata. Di satu sisi, ia dapat dianggap sebagai benda. Namun di sisi lain ia bergerak secara otonom layaknya manusia. Tentunya hal ini menjadi sebuah permasalahan identifikasi statusnya. Oleh sebab itu, dalam penelitian ini akan dibahas terkait eksistensi kecerdasan buatan dan pengaturannya, serta prospek kecerdasan buatan sebagai subjek hukum perdata di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum, sejarah hukum, dan perundang-undangan. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder. Metode kualitatif digunakan untuk menganalisa dan memaparkan data secara deskriptif. Dari hasil penelitian, diketahui bahwa kecerdasan buatan kini kian berkembang, tetapi pengaturannya masih beragam. Kecerdasan buatan bisa dipandang sebagai subjek hukum, tetapi akan menjadi permasalahan ketika kecerdasan buatan tersebut tidak dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawaban mandiri. Kecerdasan buatan dapat dinilai sebagai benda, dengan demikian kecerdasan buatan akan melekat dengan pertanggungjawaban pemiliknya sebagaimana hukum kebendaan. Kecerdasan buatan dapat juga dianggap sebagai subjek hukum yang mempunyai legal capacity parsial sebagaimana doktrin in loco parentis, yang berarti dinilai seperti anak. Apapun pilihannya, sudah waktunya Indonesia memiliki konsep hukum untuk menjadi landasan dalam pengaturan terkait kecerdasan buatan.


Keywords


Artificial Intelligence; Civil Law; Progressive Law; Kecerdasan Buatan; Subjek Hukum Perdata; Hukum Progresif



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/lr.v0i2.3513

Full Text:

PDF

References


Legislative Regulations/Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata [Burgerlijk Wetboek]. Staatsblad 1847 Nomor 23.

Konstitusi Ekuador.

Te Urewera Act 2014, Selandia Baru.

Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017, Selandia Baru.

Books/Buku

Fuady, Munir. Teori-teori Besar Dalam Hukum: Grand Theory. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.

HS, Salim. Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.

Kurki, Visa AJ. A Theory of Legal Personhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Prianto, Yuwono, Viony Kresna Sumantri, & Paksi Yudha Sasmita. Pros and Cons of AI Robot as a Legal Subject. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2020.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.

Rido, R. Ali. Badan Hukum Dan Kedudukan Badan Hukum Perseroan, Perkumpulan, Koperasi, Yayasan, Wakaf. Bandung: Alumni, 2001.

Sudjito. Hukum Progresif Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif Dalam Bingkai Nilai-Nilai Pancasila. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Pancasila UGM, 2012.

Scientific Journals/Jurnal Ilmiah

Argyrou, Aikaterini, & Harry Hummels. "Legal Personality and Economic Livelihood of the Whanganui River: A Call for Community Entrepreneurship." Water International 44, no. 6-7 (October 2019): 752-68.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1643525

Atabekov, A., & O. Yastrebov. “Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence across Countries: Legislation on the Move.” European Research Studies Journal 21, no. 4 (2018): 773–82. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1245

Baum, Seth D., Ben Goertzel, & Ted G. Goertzel. “How Long until Human-Level AI? Results from an Expert Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78, no. 1 (January 2011): 185–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.006

Buocz, Thomas Julius. “Artificial Intelligence in Court Legitimacy Problems of AI Assistance in the Judiciary.” Copenhagen Journal of Legal Studies 2, no. 1 (2018): 41–59.

Cathrin, Shely. “Tinjauan Filsafat Kebudayaan Terhadap Upacara Adat Bersih-Desa Di Desa Tawun, Kecamatan Kasreman, Kabupaten Ngawi, Jawa Timur.” Jurnal Filsafat 27, no. 1 (February 2017): 30-64. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.22841

Kusumawardani, Qur’ani Dewi. “Hukum Progresif Dan Perkembangan Teknologi Kecerdasan Buatan.” Veritas et Justitia 5, no. 1 (2019): 166–90. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3270.

Maryanto, Budi. “Big Data Dan Pemanfaatannya Dalam Berbagai Sektor.” Media Informatika 16, no. 2 (2017): 14-9.

Niman, Erna Mena. “Kearifan Lokal Dan Upaya Pelestarian Lingkungan Alam.” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Missio 11, no. 1 (January 2019): 91-106.

Nurcahyanto, Arbi. “Legal Capacity ASEAN Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Laut China Selatan.” Hukum Bisnis 4, no. 2 (October 2020): 471-84.

Paul, Sanu. “River as a Legal Entity: An Analysis in the Light of Mohammed Salim vs. State of Uttarakhand.” The IUP Law Review 8, no. 4 (2018): 34.

Pecharroman, Lidia Cano. “Rights of Nature: Rivers That Can Stand in Court.” Resources 7, no. 13 (February 2018): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7010013.

Scherer, Matthew U. “Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies.” SSRN Electronic Journal 29, no. 2 (May 2015): 354-400. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2609777

Schirmer, Jan-Erik, & Gregor Bachmann. “Artificial Intelligence and Legal Personality: Introducing Teilrechtsfähigkeit: A Partial Legal Status Made in Germany.” Springer International Publishing (2020): 11–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32361-5_6

Volokh, Eugene. “Chief Justice Robots.” Duke Law Journal 68, no. 6 (2019): 1136–92.

Widiyono, Try. “Perkembangan Teori Hukum dan Doktrin Hukum Piercing the Corporate Veil dalam UUPT dan Realitasnya serta Prospektif Kedepannya”. Lex Jurnalica 10, No. 1 (April 2013): 26-39.

Court Descicion/Putusan Pengadilan

Putusan Pengadilan India: Mohd Salim v. State of Uttarakhand and Others. 20 March 2017.

Internet

Ameer. “What Is Blockchain Technology? Finally a Simple Guide!” Ameer Rosic. Accessed 24 May 2016. https://ameerrosic.com/what-is-blockchain-finally-a-simple-guide/.

Anggraeni & Partners. “Kecerdasan Buatan –Artificial Intelligence Tantangannya Bagi Hukum Indonesia.” Accessed 1 December 2020. https://ap-lawsolution.com/id/actio/kecerdasan-buatan-artificial-intelligence-tantangann-ya-bagi-hukum-indonesia/.

Cornell Law School. “In Loco Parentis.” Accessed 1 February 2021. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/in_loco_parentis.

Darlington, Nick. “Blockchain For Beginners: What Is Blockchain Technology? A Step-by-Step Guide.” Blockgeeks. Accessed 22 September 2021. https://blockgeeks.com/guides/what-is-blockchain-technology.

DDTC. “Ini Negara Yang Pertama Manfaatkan Kecerdasan Buatan Untuk Pajak.” DDTC News. Accessed 6 September 2019. https://news.ddtc.co.id/ini-negara-yang-pertama-manfaatkan-kecerdasan-buatan-untuk-pajak-17002.

Future of Life Institute. “Asilomar Artificial Intelligence Principles.” Accessed 1 February 2021. https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/.

Hardoko, Evan. “Arab Saudi, Negara Pertama Yang Beri Status Warga Negara Untuk Robot.” Kompas. Accessed 26 October 2017. https://internasional.kompas.com/read/2017/10/26/21013831/arab-saudi-negara-pertama-yang-beri-status-warga-negara-untuk-robot.

Hukumonline. “Dengan Teknologi Big Data, Pencarian Peraturan Semakin Mudah Dan Akurat.” Accessed 1 January 2021. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt58b6711211fd6/dengan-teknologi-big-data--pencarian-peraturan-semakin-mudah-dan-akurat.

Joshi, Naveen. “How Far Are We From Achieving Artificial General Intelligence?” Forbes. Accessed 10 June 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/06/10/how-far-are-we-from-achieving-artificial-general-intelligence/?sh=6d0878f76dc4.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.” Accessed 27 December 2020. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/Pekerja.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.” Accessed 1 January 2021. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/teknologi.

Mastel.id. “Kecerdasan Buatan Google Mampu Pelajari Permainan Catur Sendiri.” Accessed 14 April 2021. https://mastel.id/kecerdasan-buatan-google-mampu-pelajari-permainan-catur-sendiri/.

Morgan, Jacob. “A Simple Explanation of “The Internet Of Things.” Forbes, Accessed 13 May 2014. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobmorgan/2014/05/13/simple-explanation-internet-things-that-anyone-can-understand/.

SAS. “Big Data: What It Is and Why It Matters.” Accessed 1 January 2021. https://www.sas.com/en_us/insights/big-data/what-is-big-data.html.

Warstek. “Prinsip Asilomar: Sebuah Prinsip (Panduan) Dalam Pengembangan Kecerdasan Buatan.” Accessed 1 February 2021. https://warstek.com/asimolar/.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 FL. Yudhi Priyo Amboro, Khusuf Komarhana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.