THE EFFECT OF THE EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY SHORT LEARNING PROGRAMME USING THE WORKED-OUT EXAMPLES TEACHING APPROACH ON MATHEMATICS TEACHERS' PERFORMANCE
Abstract
Keywords
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/johme.v6i1.5264
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2012). The effects of van Heile's phases of learning geometry on students' degree of acquisition of van Heile's levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.740
Alreshidi, N. A. K. (2021). Effects of example-problem pairs on students' mathematics achievements: A mixed-method study. International Education Studies, 14(5), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n5p8
Baars, M., Visser, S., van Gog, T., de Bruin, A., & Paas, F. (2013). Completion of partially worked-out examples as a generation strategy for improving monitoring accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.09.001
Bell, B. A. (2010). Pretest-posttest design. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.). Encyclopedia of research design, 1087-1091. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publisher.
Bicer, A., Perihan, C., & Lee, Y. (2022). Pre‑service teachers' preparations for designing and implementing creativity‑directed mathematical tasks and instructional practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00409-x
Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.). Learning and teaching geometry, K-12: 1987 yearbook of the national council of teachers of mathematics, 1-16. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Edelsbrunner, P. A., & Grimm, H. (2021). Accommodating heterogeneity: The interaction of instructional scaffolding with student preconditions in the learning of hypothesis-based reasoning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355259160_Accommodating_Heterogeneity_The_Interaction_of_Instructional_Scaffolding_with_Student_Preconditions_in_the_Learning_of_Hypothesis-Based_Reasoning
Haber, J. (2021). It's time to get serious about teaching critical thinking. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2020/03/02/teaching-students-think-critically-opinion
Iltüzer, Y., & Çevik, Y. D. (2021). Effects of self‑explanation on applying decision rules in an online learning environment. Educational Information Technology, 26, 4771-4794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10499-y
Jones, K. (2002). Issues in the teaching and learning of geometry. In L. Haggarty (Ed.). Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics: Perspectives on practice, 121-139. London, UK: Routledge/Falmer.
Khatri, P. (2021). Importance of scaffolding. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.29173/writingacrossuofa2
Kim, J. Y., & Lim, K. Y. (2019). Promoting learning in online, ill-structured problem solving: The effects of scaffolding type and metacognition level. Computers & Education, 138, 116-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.001
Liao, H. (2019). Connecting principled information and worked examples: Effects of content abstractness and solution complexity. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 50(4), 707-727. Retrieved from https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=10115714-201906-201907310003-201907310003-707-727
Manson, E., & Ayres, P. (2021). Investigating how errors should be flagged and worked out examples structured when providing feedback to novice learners of mathematics. Educational Psychology, 41(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1650895
Mason, M., (2002). The van Hiele levels of geometric understanding. Retrieved from http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/EMAT8990/GEOMETRY/Mason,%20Marguerite.%20The%20van%20Hiele%20Levels%20of%20Geometric%20Understanding.%202002.pdf
Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3701_3
Ngirishi, H., & Bansilal, S. (2019). An exploration of high school learners' understanding of geometric concepts. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(1), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/19.77.82
Nikoloudakis, E., & Dimakos, G. (2009). Using learning objects to teach Euclidean geometry. Proceedings of Workshop in Education Athens, 277-286. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/202298819_Using_Learning_Objects_to_teach_Euclidean_Geometry
Ӧzcan, Z. Ç. (2017). The effect of self-explanation prompts and fading steps in worked-out examples on students' fraction problems performance. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.23863/kalem.2017.82
Risnawati, Andrian, D., Azmi, M. P., Amir, Z., & Nurdin, E. (2019). Development of a definition maps-based plane geometry module to improve the student teachers' mathematical reasoning ability. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 541-560. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12333a
Renkl, A., Hilbert, T. S., Schworm, S., & Reiss, K. (2007). Cognitive skill acquisition from complex examples: A taxonomy of examples and tentative instructional guidelines. In M. Prenzel (Ed.). Studies on the educational quality of schools: The final report of the DFG priority programme, 239-250. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Shongwe, B. (2019). Exploring grade 11 learners' functional understanding of proof in relation to argumentation in selected high schools. Retrieved from https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10413/18294/Shongwe_Benjamin_2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Shongwe, B. (2020). Learners' functional understandings of proof (LFUP) in mathematics: A qualitative approach. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 28(3), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.28.03.003
Sibiya, M. R. (2020). A reconsideration of the effectiveness of using geogebra in teaching Euclidean geometry. EURASIA: Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 16(9), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8360
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Tachie, S. A. (2020). The challenges of South African teachers in teaching Euclidean geometry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(8), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.16
Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 253- 295. http://www.nctm.org/publications/article.aspx?id=33073
Tropper, N., Leiss, D., & Hänze, M. (2015). Teachers' temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling. ZDM, 47(7), 1225-1240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z
Ubah, I., & Bansilal, S. (2019). The use of semiotic representations in reasoning about similar triangles in Euclidean geometry. Pythagoras, 40(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v40i1.480
Van der Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Van Gog, T., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2011). Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem example pairs on novices' learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.004
Van Putten, S., Howie, S., & Stols, G. (2010). Making Euclidean geometry compulsory: Are we prepared? Perspectives in Education, 28(4), 22-31. Retrieved from https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie/article/view/51
Vojkuvkova, I. (2012). The van Heile model of geometric thinking. WDS 12 Proceedings of Contributed Papers Part 1, 72-75. Retrieved from https://www.mff.cuni.cz/veda/konference/wds/proc/pdf12/WDS12_112_m8_Vojkuvkova.pdf
Zormelo, B. (2018). Investigating the effect of using worked-out examples teaching approach when teaching properties of special quadrilaterals in grade 10 geometry [Master’s Thesis]. South Africa: University of South Africa. Retrieved from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/59911685/ZORMELO_B._final_MEd._desertation_for_final_submision_201820190702-127336-1so9rmj-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1653873333&Signature=SluCweyt3E-u2J94~XMbQgFoe9AZoWZGGaWrZS8fbE5a~OdDWm3PTgPN~AMXkJRrN7yjq31eJ7somQ43hvqPZh4~4Ev44Xb4Ij4GJMO~qDRxfAs4Q3~fQS~r0TB1~NGPDbdnwBMYRhn6PeVR98o9PdYbsR1vtWhOOO9wL5tq38kIMnAatO-19F2-fgI9Omr3FPjL9UAj7Iv2wCQtOmY7E6BM1z7CpZu~QC61cKCW3K1TY~GHdTyz36ExY7WAYgJG~SJkeu8-EGMKQawPfcy4iP6H8Uh10yGUCxsMxNHnjhHSm~7C8E7EfATIA8Z3WnODV8X14y2uq49n-IW0e9AhyQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Msebenzi Rabaza, Joleen Hamilton
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Department of Mathematics Education | Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Indonesia, 15811 | Tel +62 21 5466057 | Fax +62 21 5461055