DETERMINASI KEADILAN PROSEDURAL, KEADILAN INTERAKSIONAL, KEADILAN DISTRIBUTIF DENGAN MOTIVASI KERJA SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING TERHADAP KEPUASAN KERJA KARYAWAN DI RSUD RAJA AHMAD TABIB [DETERMINATION OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE, DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE WITH WORK MOTIVATION AS AN INTERVENING VARIABLE ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION AT RAJA AHMAD TABIB HOSPITAL]

Putry Andriani, Elli Widia, Shine Pintor Siolemba Patiro

Abstract


Based on the report on the results of the community satisfaction survey in 2020, it is known that the community is still not satisfied with the services provided by the employees of Raja Ahmad Tabib Hospital. Among them is the attitude of employees who are not friendly, don't smile, and don't care. Several studies in the field of organizational justice show that perceptions of fairness have an important influence on organizational commitment, job satisfaction, intention to leave work, organizational behavior, and performance. It is recognized that considerations of fairness can cause emotional responses, especially in times of injustice. Unsatisfactory service can be suspected because employees do not get justice in the organization which affects their performance in providing services. The population in this study were employees and sampling was carried out purposively (purposive sampling). The results showed that distributive justice had no effect on employee motivation with a value of 0.104 > 0.05, procedural justice had an effect on employee motivation with a value of 0.003 <0.05, and interactional justice had an effect on work motivation with a value of 0.000 <0.05. In addition, work motivation is not able to mediate the relationship between distributive justice and job satisfaction. Meanwhile, work motivation can mediate the relationship between procedural and interactional justice on the job satisfaction of Raja Ahmad Tabib Hospital employees.

Abstrak dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Berdasarkan laporan hasil dari survey kepuasan masyarakat pada tahun 2020 diketahui bahwa masyarakat masih belum puas terhadap pelayanan yang diberikan karyawan RSUD Raja Ahmad Tabib. Diantaranya sikap karyawan tidak ramah, kurang senyum dan tidak peduli. Beberapa penelitian di bidang keadilan organisasi menunjukkan bahwa persepsi keadilan memiliki pengaruh penting pada komitmen organisasi, kepuasan kerja, niat untuk berhenti bekerja, perilaku organisasi, dan kinerja. Diakui bahwa pertimbangan keadilan dapat menyebabkan respons emosional, terutama pada saat terjadinya ketidakadilan. Pelayanan yang kurang memuaskan bisa diduga karena karyawan yang tidak memperoleh keadilan dalam organisasi sehingga berpengaruh pada kinerjanya dalam memberikan pelayanan. Hal ini menjadi dasar peneliti untuk melakukan penelitian mengenai pengaruh keadilan Organisasi terhadap motivasi kerja yang berdampak pada kepuasan kerja karyawan di RSUD Raja Ahmad Tabib. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh keadilan distributif, keadilan prosedural, keadilan interaksi terhadap motivasi karyawan dan pengaruh motivasi kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan RSUD Raja Ahmad Tabib. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keadilan distributif tidak berpengaruh pada motivasi kerja karyawan dengan nilai 0.104 > 0.05, keadilan prosedural berpengaruh terhadap motivasi kerja karyawan dengan nilai 0.003 < 0.05 dan keadilan interaksional berpengaruh terhadap motivasi kerja dengan nilai 0.000 < 0.05. Selain itu, motivasi kerja tidak mampu memediasi hubungan antara keadilan distributif terhadap kepuasan kerja. Sedangkan motivasi kerja mampu memediasi hubungan keadilan prosedural dan interaksional terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan RSUD Raja Ahmad Tabib.


Keywords


distributive justice; procedural fairness; interactional justice; work motivation; job satisfaction; Keadilan distributif; keadilan prosedural; keadilan interaksional; motivasi kerja dan kepuasan kerja



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/derema.v18i1.6574

References


Chukwuma, E., & Obiefuna, O. (2014). Effect of Motivation on Employee Productivity: A Study of. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 137-147.

Cohen-Charash, Y., & E. Spector, P. (2002). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 278-321. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958

Colquitt, J. (2001). On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 386-400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386

Cropanzano, R., E. Bowen, D., & W. Gilliland, S. (2007). The Management of Organizational Justice. Academy of Management, 21(4) 34-48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.27895338

Donovan, M., Drasgow, F., & Munson, L. (1998). The Perception of Fair Interpersonal Treatment Scale: Development and Validation of a Measure of Interpersonal Treatment in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5) 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.683

Farida, S. I., Iqbal, M., & Kurniasih, A. (2016). Pengaruh kepercayaan dan komitmen Organisasi terhadap motivasi dan kepuasan kerja. Jurnal Kependidikan, 121-134. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v46i1.9576

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Indrayani, L. C., & Suwandana, I. M. (2016). Pengaruh keadilan organisasional terhadap kepuasan kerja dan komitmen organisasional pada karyawan . E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud, 3589-3619.

Barclay, L., & P. Skarlicki, D. (2009). Healing the Wounds of Organizational Injustice: Examining the Benefits of. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2) 511-523. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013451

Judge, T., Piccolo, R., & Ilies, R. (2004). The Forgotten Ones? The Validity of Consideration and Initiating Structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1) 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36

Kondalkar, V. (2007). Organizational behavior. New Dehli: New Age International.

Gibson, J., M. Ivancevich, J., H. Jonnelly, J., & Konopaske, R. (2012). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Laurie, J. (2005). Management and organisational behaviour (7th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.

Lay Khuan, S., & Nasrudin, A. (2011). Organizational justice, age, and performance connection in Malaysia. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 21(3) 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/10569211111165316

Lind, E., & Tyler, T. (1998). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

Luthans, F. (2006). Perilaku organisasi. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Andi, 2006.

Moorhead, G., & Ricky W, G. (2014). Organizational behavior: managing people and organizations (11th ed.). South-Western.

Northouse, P. (2016). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 91-94.

Nurman, & Budiyanti, H. (2019). Peran Penelitian dalam Menunjang Percepatan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional.

Pamela, A., & Oloko. (2015). Effect of motivation on employee performance of commercial banks in kenya : A case study of Kenya Commercial Bank in Migori County. Journal of Human Resource Studies, 5(2) 87. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v5i2.7504

Pinder, C. (2015). Work motivation in organizational behavior. New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734606

Purba, S. D., Carissa, B., & Effendi. (2019). Pengaruh Dukungan Organisasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dengan Adaptabilitas Karier sebagai variabel mediasi pada Dosen di Jabotabek. DeReMa Jurnal Manajemen, 14(1) 123-133. https://doi.org/10.19166/derema.v14i1.1332

Purnomo, Y., & Bernarto. (2017). Pengaruh Self-Efficacy, Budaya Organisasi dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Komitmen Organisasi. DeReMa Jurnal Manajemen, 12(1) 114-138. https://doi.org/10.19166/derema.v12i1.410

Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2013). Organisational Behavior. Boston: Pearson.

Sastrohadiwiryo, S. (2003). Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Skarlicki, D., & Folger, R. (1997). The Roles of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 434-443. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.434

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Wang, X., Liao, J., Xia, D., & Chang, T. (2010). The Impact of Organizational Justice on Work Performance ; Mediating Effect of Oragnizational Commitment and Leader-member Exchange. International Journal of Manpower, 660–677. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721011073364

Wiwiek, & Sondakh, O. (2105). Pengaruh Keadilan Organisasi pada motivasi karyawan dan komitmen organisasional. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol19.iss1.art6

Woolfolk, A. (1993). Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Wu, G., Liu, C., & Zhao, X. (2017). Investigating the relationship between communication-conflict interaction and project success among construction project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 1466-1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.08.006


Cited by

  • There are currently no citations to this article.




Copyright (c) 2023 Putry Andriani, Elli Widia, Shine Pintor Siolemba Patiro

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


favicon Department of Management | Business School | Universitas Pelita Harapan | Indonesia | +62 21 546 0901 |  jurnal.derema@uph.edu