Owner Situationally Specific Motivation, And Organisational Citizenship Behaviour: A Study of New Zealand Entrepreneurs

Saifon Chairungruang

Abstract


Despite the extensive developments in entrepreneurship theory over recent decades, there is a lack of empirical studies examining the influence of owner situationally specific motivation on firm performance focusing on small and medium sized enterprises (SME) in New Zealand. The present study attempts to bridge this gap. At the same time, it responds to calls to extend performance measures to include non-financial outcomes by using organisational citizenship behaviours – OCB – as a performance measure. This is based on the observation that OCBs are consistently presented in the literature as a cornerstone of good performance and competitive advantage. The study uses mixed methods, combining surveys and semi-structured interviews. Multiple regression is used to analyse data on entrepreneurial situationally specific motivation (i.e. communicated vision, self-efficacy, and goals) provided by a sample of 107 firms. In addition, 107 pairs, each comprising an owner-manager plus a random employee from the same firm, also supplied data on organisational citizenship behaviours. Finally, nine qualitative interviews were conducted with owners to further enhance understanding. The study highlights the statistical significance of the positive relationship of entrepreneurial situationally specific motivation and OCB. This finding suggests that owners who have confidence in their abilities [self-efficacy] and who have communicated their vision [communicated vision] are more likely to encourage in their employees the behaviours that are required in order to function well in their organisations. The implications of this finding for potential future research are discussed.


Keywords


Entrepreneurship; Organisational Citizenship Behaviour; Performance; Small and Medium-sized Enterprise; New Zealand

Full Text

PDF

References


Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 25(4), 41.

Aldrich, H. E., & Wiedenmayer, G. (1993). From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organisational foundings. In J. A. Katz & R. H. Brockhaus Sr. (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (pp. 44-195). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bandura, A., Pastorelli, C., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (1999). Self-efficacy pathways to childhood depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 258-269.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.258

Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership :theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed ed.). New York: Free Press.

Baum, & Locke. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587-598.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.587

Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069456

Bird, B. (1989). Entrepreneurial behaviour. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Company.

Busenitz, L. W., & Lau, C.-M. (1996). A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 20(4), 25-39.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 16(1), 7-25.

Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45-61.

Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & McKee, J. E. (1999). Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure, and process: Suggested research directions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(3), 85.

Haar, J. M., & White, B. J. (2013). Corporate entrepreneurship and information technology towards employee retention: a study of New Zealand firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(1), 109-125.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2011.00178.x

Howell, J. M., & Frost, P. J. (1989). A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(2), 243-269.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90052-6

Jogaratnam, G., Tse, E. C., & Olsen, M. D. (1999). An empirical analysis of entrepreneurship and performance in the restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 23(4), 339-353.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109634809902300401

Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 36-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.36

Koys, D. J. (2001). The effects of employee satisfaction, organisational citizenship behaviour, and turnover on organisational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 101-114.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00087.x

Larwood, L., Falbe, C. M., Kriger, M. P., & Miesing, P. (1995). Structure and meaning of organizational vision. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 740-769.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256744

LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52

McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14359-000

Mitchell, R. K., Smith, B., Seawright, K. W., & Morse, E. A. (2000). Cross-cultural cognitions and the venture creation decision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 947-993.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1556422

Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845

Morrow, P. C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 486.

Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33(3), 761-787.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x

Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., & Wretman, J. H. k. (1992). Model assisted survey sampling. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates. Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068-1076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1068




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/derema.v11i1.190

Cited by

  • There are currently no citations to this article.




Copyright (c) 2016 Saifon Chairungruang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


favicon Department of Management | Business School | Universitas Pelita Harapan | Indonesia | +62 21 546 0901 |  jurnal.derema@uph.edu