Kontroversi Karya-Karya Edgar Degas mengenai Misogini dan Relevansinya dengan Isu Objektifikasi Perempuan dalam Media Sosial dan Periklanan

Dafy Bintang Natanael, Ferdinand Indrajaya

Abstract


Makalah ini membahas bagaimana objektifikasi perempuan dapat ditelusuri kembali ke karya-karya seni kontroversial Edgar Degas pada akhir abad ke-19 dan relevansinya dengan pandangan terhadap perempuan sampai saat ini. Penggambaran perempuan sebagai objek hasrat dalam media sosial dan periklanan pada zaman ini telah memengaruhi citra tubuh perempuan dan menimbulkan tekanan untuk memenuhi suatu standar kecantikan tertentu. Konsep male gaze memainkan peran kunci dalam pemaknaan ini, mengindikasikan dominasi pandangan laki-laki dalam media visual dan penekanan pada penampilan fisik perempuan. Pembiaran dominasi dan tindakan objektifikasi ini melahirkan beberapa permasalahan seperti, kecemasan dan rasa malu akan penampilan diri, eating disorders, depresi, serta penurunan produktivitas. Dengan fenomena objektifikasi perempuan yang terus berkelanjutan, tanggapan yang tepat dari masyarakat diperlukan. Makalah ini hendak mengeksplorasi dan menganalisis permasalahan tersebut dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif, khususnya penelitian kepustakaan (library research). Melalui Langkah metodologis tersebut, penulis menyimpulkan bahwa masyarakat memiliki peran krusial dalam meresponi dan memerangi objektifikasi perempuan secara aktif. Upaya ini dapat dicapai dengan penggunaan media sosial dan periklanan secara etis serta kritis. Hal ini dapat ditunjukkan oleh contoh kasus Billabong. Kasus ini menunjukkan bagaimana masyarakat dapat berperan aktif dalam memberi tekanan terhadap industri media untuk mengadopsi praktik pemasaran yang menghormati martabat perempuan. Melaluinya, narasi yang berdampak buruk bagi citra dan kesejahteraan perempuan di era digital ini dapat berubah.


Keywords


Edgar Degas, misogini, objektifikasi perempuan, media sosial, periklanan



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37312/de-lite.v4i1.8701

Full Text:

PDF

References


Augustus-Horvath, C., & Tylka, T. L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predicts disordered eating: Does women’s age matter? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(2), 253-265.

Banting, K. (2017, August 9). Fck You Billabong. Seriously, fck you. Medium. Retrieved from https://you.women2.com/f-ck-you-billabong-seriously-f-ck-you-84995f3d794

Broude, N. (1977). Degas’s “Misogyny”. Woman's Art Journal, 16(2), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/1358573

Chadwick, W. (2012). Women, Art, and Society (5th ed.). London, UK: Thames & Hudson.

Chu, P. H. (2016). Aestheticizing the ugly: Irigaray, Degas, and the spectacle of modernity. Oxford Art Journal, 39(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxartj/kcw008

Fardouly, J., Pinkus, R., & Vartanian, L. (2017). The impact of appearance comparisons made through social media, traditional media, and in person in women’s everyday lives. Body Image, 20, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.11.002.

Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173-206.

Getty Center. (2023, December 15). After the Bath. Getty Museum. https://www.getty.edu/art/collection/object/108H4X?tab=bibliography

Gor, R. A. (2018). Objectification of Woman in Media. International Journal of Research, 6(3), 84-87.

Gould, H. & Swift, J. (2011, January 11). Ending exploitation of women and girls. UNICEF USA. Retrieved from https://www.unicefusa.org/stories/not-object-sexualization-and-exploitation-women-and-girls-0

Guillaud, L. (2016). Why Edgar Degas's Realism Makes Him a Feminist Icon. Artsy. Retrieved from https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-why-edgar-degas-s-realism-makes-him-a-feminist-icon

Heller, S. (2017, August 12). A woman wrote a viral essay slamming a surf brand for its 'insulting' ad: 'It's just straight objectification'. Medium. Retrieved from https://www.insider.com/billabong-sexist-objectification-ad-surfer-medium-essay-2017-8

Jones, C. P. (2022, January 19). Degas’ Art and His Curious Relationship with Women. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/thinksheet/the-misogynist-artist-who-was-obsessed-with-women-3bacb9003a0a

Mauro, G. & Schellmann, H. (2023, February 8). Biased AI Algorithms and Their Impact on Racy Images of Women's Bodies. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/08/biased-ai-algorithms-racy-women-bodies.

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18.

Obejas, A. (1996, December 24). The Dark Side of Degas. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1996-12-24-9612240041-story.html

The Art Newspaper. (2018, October 5). Degas’s lost drawings go on show in Paris. Retrieved from https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/degas-lost-drawings-go-on-show-in-paris

The National Gallery. (n.d.). Glossary: History Paintings. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/glossary/history-paintings


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 de-lite: Journal of Visual Communication Design Study & Practice

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

de-lite:
Journal of Visual Communication
Design Study & Practice
--------------------------------------
Download: Indonesian Guideline & Template
Download: English Guideline & Template

If you have any problems opening the file, please try right-clicking and "Save lin as".