Revolution in Intellectual Property Rights: Artificial Intelligence as the Inventor of a Patent
Abstract
The inevitability of the Exponential Development of Man-Made Technology is virtually apparent. Upon entry into Society 5.0 as initiated by the Japanese Government and now the Indonesian Government, the Sophistication of Artificial Intelligence in obtaining rights equivalent to that of humans should not be taken too lightly. Over the past 20 years, all of the Fruits that Artificial Intelligence had yielded result in nothing as the Provisions under the umbrella of Intellectual Property Law do not acknowledge the Inventions that were founded by a non-human Inventor. The reason behind this is because the Patent Law offers an exhaustive list of definitions for the subject of Patent, resulting in the incapacity of Artificial Intelligences in boarding the boat of Patent Right Law on which they can be legally recognized as Inventors or even Owners of the Patent. Cognizant of the dynamic nature of Law, it is reasonable to believe that Law will adapt to the prevailing circumstances and social phenomenon. That is to say, Indonesia’s Patent Law will adapt to the new challenges presented before it, one of which is the right of Artificial Intelligence in generating Inventions that are Novel, Non-obvious, and Useful and to be recognized as its Inventor.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Laws and Regulations Law No. 7 of 1994 concerning the Ratification of the Agreement Establishing the WTO Law No. 14 of 2001 concerning Patent Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transaction Law No. 12 of 2011 concerning Legislation Making Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patent Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transaction Presidential Decision No. 16 of 1997 regarding Ratification of Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Books Asshiddiqie, Jimly, and Muchamad Ali Safa'at. Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006. Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. Hukum, Masyarakat dan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. Bandung: Binacipta (1995). Peñalvo, García, and Francisco J. Information Technology Trends for a Global and Interdisciplinary Research Community. Hershey: IGI Global, 2021. Qamar, Nurul. Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Dan Peradilan Civil Law System Dan Common Law System. Makassar: Pustaka Refleksi, 2010. Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Perkasa, 2003. Journal Articles Abbott, Ryan. “I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law.” Boston College Law Review 2, 57, no. 4 (September 28, 2016). Arajärvi, Noora. “Between Lex Lata and Lex Ferenda? Customary International (Criminal) Law and the Principle of Legality.” Tilburg Law Review: Journal of International and European Law 15, no. 2 (2011): 163–83. Butho, Zulfikar Ali. “Ratifikasi WTO dan Dampaknya pada Pembangunan dan Pembaharuan Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia (Suatu Tinjauan Ontologis).” Keadilan Progresif 2, no. 2 (2011). Fernández, Fernando. “The Non-Obviousness Requirement in the Chilean Patent Law: A Critical Assessment.” Revista Chilena de Derecho 38, no. 3 (2011). Grewal, Dalvinder Singh. "A critical conceptual analysis of definitions of artificial intelligence as applicable to computer engineering." IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering 16, no. 2 (2014): 9-13. Koza, John R. "Human-competitive results produced by genetic programming." Genetic programming and evolvable machines 11, no. 3 (2010): 251-284. Paulson, Stanley. “The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12 (1992): 311– 32. Ridlwan, Zulkarnain. “Negara Hukum Indonesia Kebalikan Nachtwachterstaat.” Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2012). Romiszowski, Alexander. “Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems in Education: Progress, Promise and Problems.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 3, no. 1 (1987). Scotchmer, Suzanne, and Jerry Green. “Novelty and disclosure in patent law.” The RAND Journal of Economics no. 1 (1990): 131- 146. Thaler, Stephen. “Synaptic Perturbation and Consciousness.” International Journal of Machine Consciousness 6, no. 2 (2014): 75– 107. Thesis or Dissertations Pratidina, Ilhami Ginang. “Keabsahan Perjanjian Melalui Agen Elektronik Dalam Sistem Hukum Kontrak Indonesia.” PhD diss., Universitas Airlangga, 2017. International Conventions/Treaties TRIPS Agreement (Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights) PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) Australian Patents Act 1990 Swiss Federal Act on the Amendment of Civil Code Court and/or Arbitration Rulings Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 News or Magazine Articles BBC Technology News. “AI Cannot Be the Inventor of a Patent, Appeals Court Rules.” BBC, September 23, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-58668534. Cahya, Indra. “Indonesia Disebut Belum SIAP Terapkan Kecerdasan Buatan Di Sektor Ekonomi.” Merdeka.com, February 13, 2020. https://www.merdeka.com/teknologi/indonesia-disebut- belum-siap-terapkan-kecerdasan-buatan-di-sektor- ekonomi.html Jones, Alexandra. “Can Artificial Intelligence Be an Inventor? A Landmark Australian Court Decision Says It Can.” ABC News, August 2, 2021. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08- 01/historic-decision-allows-ai-to-be-recognised-as-an-inve ntor/100339264. Mashabi, Sania. “Putusan MK: UU Cipta Kerja Harus Dinyatakan CACAT Formil.” Kompas.com, November 25, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-58668534 Website Contents Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi. “BPPT Siap Gelar Artificial Intelligence Summit 2020.” Accessed December 17, 2021. https://www.bppt.go.id/berita-bppt/bppt-siap-gelar- artificial-intelligence-summit-2020. Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi. “Strategi Nasional untuk Kecerdasan Artifisial (STRANAS KA) Indonesia Tahun 2020-2045.” Accessed December 17, 2021. https://ai- innovation.id/server/static/ebook/stranas-ka.pdf. Fauziah, Khairun Nisa. “Sosialisasi Undang-Undang Paten (Baru) Nomor 13 Tahun 2016.” Accessed December 10, 2021. https://jdih.bppt.go.id/berita/10-sosialisasi-undang-undang- paten-baru-nomor-13-tahun-2016. Galaski, Jascha. “AI Regulation: Present Situation and Future Possibilities.” Liberties.eu. Accessed December 10, 2021. https://www.liberties.eu/en/stories/ai-regulation/43740 Hamer, Richard, Lauren John, and Alexandra Moloney. “DABUS: Decoding Australia's AI Decision.” Accessed December 10, 2021. https://www.worldipreview.com/article/dabus- decoding-australia-s-ai-decision Inventors Eye. “Can Recipes be Patented?” Accessed December 17, 2021. https://perma.cc/EN3V-9DY4 Keats, Jonathon. “John Koza Has Built an Invention Machine: Its creations earn patents, outperform humans, and will soon fly to space. All it needs now is a few worthy challenges.” Last modified April 19, https://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2006-04/john- 2006. koza-has-built-invention-machine/. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. “Memasuki Era Society 5.0, Menko Airlangga Sampaikan Untuk Membangun Talenta Digital Dan Meningkatkan Literasi Digital.” Accessed December 17, 2021. https://www.ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/3397/memasuki- era-society-50-menko-airlangga-sampaikan-untuk- membangun-talenta-digital-dan-meningkatkan-literasi-digital Mahardika, Zahrasafa P., and Angga Priancha. “Pengaturan Hukum Artifical Intelligence Indonesia Saat Ini.” Accessed December 17, 2021. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pengaturan- hukum-artifical-intelligence-indonesia-saat-ini- lt608b740fb22b7. Matulionyte, Rita. “Australian Court Says That AI Can Be an Inventor: What Does It Mean for Authors?”. Last modified September 29, 2021. http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/09/29/australi an-court-says-that-ai-can-be-an-inventor-what-does-it-mean- for-authors/. Singh, Maanvi. “Our Supercomputer Overlord Is Now Running a Food Truck.” Last modified March 4, 2014. https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2014/03/03/2853266 11/our-supercomputer-overlord-is-now-running-a-food-truck Waranggani, Arundati Swastika. “Wamenkumham: AI Sulit Dikategorikan Sebagai Subjek Hukum.” Cloud Computing Indonesia. Accessed December 10, 2021. https://www.cloudcomputing.id/berita/wamenkumham-ai- sulit-dikategorikan-subjek-hukum. WIPO. “The PCT now has 154 Contracting States.” Accessed December 17, 2021. https://www.wipo.int/pct/en/pct_contracting_states.html.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Anthology: Inside Intellectual Property Rights