The Market Orientation and Performance Relationship: An Empirical Study in Private Universities

Sefnedi Sefnedi

Abstract


This study examines the empirical link between three dimensions of market orientation, namely, student orientation, competitor orientation and inter-functional coordination, and private university performance in Kopertis X. The study was based on an empirical investigation of private universities located in Indonesia’s provinces of West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Riau Islands. The primary data for the study were collected from a self-administered mail survey of 237 questionnaires from the private university resulting in a sample of 114 usable responses being returned. From the application of the multiple regression analysis it was concluded that all three dimensions of market orientation had a significant impact on private university performance. Student orientation as a predictor variable is the strongest predictor of private university performance then followed by competitor orientation, and inter-functional coordination.


Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Penelitian ini menguji hubungan empiris antara tiga dimensi orientasi pasar, yaitu, orientasi mahasiswa, orientasi pesaing dan koordinasi antar-fungsional dan kinerja perguruan tinggi swasta di Kopertis X. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada penyelidikan empiris pada universitas swasta yang berada di provinsi Sumatera Barat, Riau, Jambi, dan Kepulaian Riau. Data primer dikumpulkan dari survei dimana dari 237 kuesioner yang disebarkan pada universitas swasta, diperoleh 114 kuesioner yang dikembalikan dan dapat digunakan sebagai sampel. Berdasarkan hasil analisis regresi berganda dapat disimpulkan bahwa ketiga dimensi orientasi pasar memiliki dampak yang signifikan terhadap kinerja perguruan tinggi swasta. Orientasi mahasiswa sebagai variabel prediktor terkuat terhadap kinerja perguruan tinggi swasta kemudian diikuti oleh orientasi pesaing, dan koordinasi antar-fungsional.


Keywords


market orientation; private universities; performance; Kopertis X; Indonesia



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/derema.v12i1.331

Full Text

PDF

References


Algarni, A. M. M., & Thalib, N. A. (2014). A framework of measuring the impact of market orientation on the outcome of higher education institutions mediated by innovation. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3(2), 607-624.

Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783

Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Market orientation and the new product paradox. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00145.x

Cabrito, B. G. (2004). Higher education: An education for the elites? The Portuguese case. Higher Education in Europe, 29(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720410001673283

Cadogan, J. W., & Cui, C. C. (2004). Chinese export agents’ adoption of export market-oriented behaviors: Measurement and performance relationship. Journal of Asia Pacific Marketing, 3(2), 21–37.

Collins, J. (1990). A market performance comparison of US firms active in domestic, developed and developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(2), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490335

Deshpande, R., & Farley, J. U. (2004). Organizational culture, market orientation, innovativeness, and firm performance: An international research odyssey. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.04.002

Douglas, S., & Craig, C. (1983). Examining performance of US multinationals in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(3), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490527

Ferreira, A. I., & Hill, M. M. (2007). Organizational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study. Higher Education, 55, 637-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9080-6

Flavian, C., & Lozano, J. (2006). Organizational antecedents of market orientation in the public university system. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(5), 447-467. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610677771

Frambach, R., Prabhu, J., & Verhallen, T. (2003). The influence of business strategy on new product activity: The role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20, 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.03.003

Grinstein, A. (2008). The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0053-1

Hemsley-Brown J. V., & Oplatka, I. (2010). Market orientation in universities: A comparative study of two national higher education systems. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(3), 204-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011031565

Hooley, G., Fahy, J., Greenley, G., Beracs, J., Fonfara, K., & Snoj, B. (2003). Market orientation in the service sector of the transition economies of Central Europe. European Journal of Marketing, 37(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310453975

Im, S., & Workman, J. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68, 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.114.27788

Johnson, J. L., Cullen, J. B., Sakano, T., & Bronson, J. W. (2001). Drivers and outcomes of parent company intervention in IJV management: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Research, 52, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00081-8

Julian, C. C. (2010). The market orientation–marketing performance relationship: The empirical link in international joint ventures. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 3, 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2010.035758

Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251866

Kotler, P., Adam, S., Brown, L., & Armstrong, G. (2008). Principles of marketing (4th ed.). Sydney, Australia: Prentice Hall.

Kyriakopoulos, K., & Moorman, C. (2004). Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.01.001

Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251757

Oczkowski, E., & Farrell, M. A. (1998). Discriminating between measurement scales using non-parametric tests and two stage least squares estimators: The case of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(4), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(98)00007-X

Pelham, A. M. (1997), Mediating influences on the relationship between market orientation and profitability in small industrial firms. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 5(3), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1997.11501771

Racela, O., Chaikittisilpa, C., & Thoumrungroje, A. (2007). Market orientation, international business relationships and perceived export performance. International Marketing Review, 24(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330710741794

Rose, G. M., & Shoham, A. (2002). Export performance and market orientation: Establishing an empirical link. Journal of Business Research, 55, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00139-9

Sefnedi & Sallam, M. A. (2016). The marketing competency-export performance relationship: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Research Science & Management. 3(5), 1-9.

Sin, L. Y. M., Tse, A. C. B., Yau, O. H. M., Chow, R. P. M., & Lee, J. S. Y. (2005). Market orientation, relationship market orientation, and business performance: The moderating effects of economic ideology and industry type. Journal of International Marketing, 13(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.13.1.36.58538

Singh, S. (2009). How market orientation and outsourcing create capability and impact business performance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 51, 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20283

Zebal, M. A., & Goodwin, D. R. (2012). Market oriantation and performance in private universities. Marketing Intelegence and Planning, 30(3), 79-92.


Cited by

  • There are currently no citations to this article.




Copyright (c) 2017 Sefnedi Sefnedi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


favicon Department of Management | Business School | Universitas Pelita Harapan | Indonesia | +62 21 546 0901 |  jurnal.derema@uph.edu